Scientific theory and scientific method: Are they applicable to God?

Started by JesusIsAlive20 pages
JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Jbill311
ARCHAEOPTERYX

You have failed to substantiate that this is not a fossil from a species that was created this way by God. There is no evidence that this species evolved from a lower species into a higher one.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by Boris
Why do you even bother addressing what he posts, he is taking the piss.

He has a predictable ability to show how analretintive he can be. I like to expose him, so people can then make their own minds up. 😉

JesusIsAlive Restricted
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He has a predictable ability to show how analretintive he can be. I like to expose him, so people can then make their own minds up. 😉
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have shown you at least two, but all you did was insult me in return.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have failed to substantiate that this is not a fossil from a species that was created this way by God. There is no evidence that this species evolved from a lower species into a higher one.
Boris New Member

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He has a predictable ability to show how analretintive he can be. I like to expose him, so people can then make their own minds up. 😉

Whatever floats your boat.. 👆

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive

So you have nothing to say? 😆

JesusIsAlive Restricted

I have responded pal, buddy.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He has a predictable ability to show how analretintive he can be. I like to expose him, so people can then make their own minds up. 😉
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have shown you at least two, but all you did was insult me in return.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have failed to substantiate that this is not a fossil from a species that was created this way by God. There is no evidence that this species evolved from a lower species into a higher one.
Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I have responded pal, buddy.

How old are you; 11 or 12? 😆

PITT_HAPPENS "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You have failed to substantiate that this is not a fossil from a species that was created this way by God. There is no evidence that this species evolved from a lower species into a higher one.
You have failed to prove the the Bible is the word of God, you have failed to prove that you are not a computer program, you have failed to prove that you didn't evolve from a duck, you have failed to prove that you can chew gum and walk at the same time, you have failed...

inimalist Junior Member

JIA, what are your hypothesis and null hypothesis?

Jbill311 The Blind Critic

JIA, what WOULD prove to you that evolution occured?
What would, from your point of view, be definitive evidence?

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by Jbill311
JIA, what WOULD prove to you that evolution occured?
What would, from your point of view, be definitive evidence?

I don't think he will answer that question. He has been asked that before and all he said was something like "evolution is a lie".

Jbill311 The Blind Critic

So, just in the interest of fairness, and keeping an open mind, what would be enough to convice you of ID? (or creationism). For me it would require no less than god:
1). Proving he exists.
2). Explaining why he presented so much evidence against himself (why is he sneaky?!?)
3). Explaining why humans don't get his powers too.
(I want to create universes!!!)

Adam_PoE Senior Member

We are still waiting for you explanation.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
By all means, explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as a scientific theory when it is not testable, correctable, falsifiable, and does not make any predictions about the natural world or its phenomena.
Jbill311 The Blind Critic

Re: We are still waiting for you explanation.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
By all means, explain how Intelligent Design qualifies as a scientific theory when it is not testable, correctable, falsifiable, and does not make any predictions about the natural world or its phenomena.

Seconded

Alliance Enforcer of the Republic
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
There is no evidence that this species evolved from a lower species into a higher one.

maybe if you stopped reading arguments about evolution from the late 1700's, you'd understand it.

Oh...and what POE said.

Goddess Kali Perfection

JESUSISALIVE, how old are you reallly ?

how come you never tell us anything about yourself. You expect us to trust you, but you choose to remain a mystery.

Boris New Member

He is an evolutionary biologist, a sceptic and an atheist, he posts here to annoy or to ammuse himself.

Well.. that's my idea anyway, not a chance he is actually who.. or what he says he is.

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Originally posted by Boris
He is an evolutionary biologist, a sceptic and an atheist, he posts here to annoy or to ammuse himself.

Well.. that's my idea anyway, not a chance he is actually who.. or what he says he is.

The problem is he has gotten upset before (maybe it was me 😮 ) and that can tell a lot. I think he is less then what we think. Just a kid...

Boris New Member

He has? Hahaha, link?

Shakyamunison Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Originally posted by Boris
He has? Hahaha, link?

Which one? 😮 😆