It's harder to clean a non-circumcised penis than a circumcised one.
Chances are traces of smegma will still be left under the foreskin, even after washing with soap and water.
And the chances of getting infection is higher than cirumcised ones, as proven by scientific research.
Also, my ex-GF told me that the majority of non-circumcised partners she had sex with have dirty, smelly penises.
She doesn't want to risk getting infections so she tells them to wear condoms.
That's why she still prefers circumcized penises.
Originally posted by occultdestroyer
It's harder to clean a non-circumcised penis than a circumcised one.
Chances are traces of smegma will still be left under the foreskin, even after washing with soap and water.And the chances of getting infection is higher than cirumcised ones, as proven by scientific research.
umm... yeah... no.
It is a very mixed results topic, for sure. I would say that if the circumcising physician does it properly and the parents follow-up with the appropriate care, the benefits will greatly outweigh the negatives.
There's plenty of evidence out there for diseases benefits of circumcision (just type "circumcision" into google and research it yourself. 😐 ), however, many of those benefits are outweighed by negatives.
I would say that it in a country like the U.S.A. or the U.K., circumcision should be done. We have access to anything and everything we need to do it properly and follow up with the proper care. (Gaining all the benefits and minimizing the negatives.)
The sensitivity thing is still debatable. However, with PE problems being prevalent, I'm not entirely sure leaving more sensitivity is what is needed...if uncircumcised is even more sensitive in the first place.
it is mutilation, plain and simple. cleanliness is a question of personal HYGEINE. you dont go off and cut your the coles of your FEAT off because they can smell do you?! it impaires sexual stimulation as the a portion of the skin with high nerve endings is gone and was usually practiced in ancient societies to hapmer people form masturbating. it also reveals the more tender originally covered skin which can become more callused and less seneitive and more pained without it, furthermore, there is far less skin to stretch in erections etc which can be painful among other things. and newborns can not give consent for such things anyway. again, ritual mutilation.