Does circumcision matter?

Originally posted by emerald1
My bf has a very big penis and a long foreskin and he cleans very well. I love it. I'm sure everyone has some degree of bacteria no matter how hard they clean.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
it is mutilation, plain and simple. cleanliness is a question of personal HYGEINE. you dont go off and cut your the coles of your FEAT off because they can smell do you?! it impaires sexual stimulation as the a portion of the skin with high nerve endings is gone and was usually practiced in ancient societies to hapmer people form masturbating. it also reveals the more tender originally covered skin which can become more callused and less seneitive and more pained without it, furthermore, there is far less skin to stretch in erections etc which can be painful among other things. and newborns can not give consent for such things anyway. again, ritual mutilation.

You didn't read my post. Almost all of you post can be contradicted by scientific evidence. In industrilized countries with good medical practices, the benefits outweight the negatives. I agree with you for places like poorer parts of Africa...it can be bad.

The sensitivity thing has been contradicted in more than one study.

i had to get circumcised at around 10 because of some kind of infection or whatever

Originally posted by dadudemon
You didn't read my post. Almost all of you post can be contradicted by scientific evidence. In industrilized countries with good medical practices, the benefits outweight the negatives. I agree with you for places like poorer parts of Africa...it can be bad.

The sensitivity thing has been contradicted in more than one study.

Hygiene wise. Yerrr.

I hear in japan they come at the baby with a sword yelling banzai.

When I was snipped my dad kept the scraps. He got a pair of boots, two belts and a hatband out of the deal.

Shaky the moil.