Public Funding for Abortion

Started by leonheartmm11 pages
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is not an abortion debate, it is an allocation of taxes debate, and you have failed to substantiate why some taxpayers should be forced to fund things they are opposed to while others are not.

actually people have to pay taxes{and im not referring to UNFAIR/illogical taxes} all the time that might be against their beliefs. for instance, the money that goes in the armed forces{actually again, im not referring to things like wars, just homeland security and whatnot which parts of which are there just for protection}.there are also examples of this in money being used to raise genetically enhanced crops as opposed to organic ones. or the running of advance physics departments etc.

many people would want nothing to do with the armed forces/homeland security/genetically enhanced crops or advanced physics. they are opposed to these for one personal belief or another. and yet if taxes are not used to keep these things going, the majority would not be fed/protected from crime/and physical sciences would fail to progress and find solutions for the challenges facing the new world. its NECESSARY for citizen's to pay taxes even if not BASICALLY FAIR{just like in all truthfullnes, only altruistic ANARCHY is true freedom and fairness in governing system, but seeing the outcome, governments are at some level, a necessary evil}. lets say we look at a mormon who cultivates on the land, feeds himself and uses teh resources of the land. yet wants NOTHING to do with the modern healthcare system, not for his children, not for his people and not for his wife or that he doesnt want roads built leading to CIVILISATION. just on THAT plea should he be exempted from paying taxes which are for the welfare of the public and his children simply based on his nonsensical beliefs? no.

i think the problem is that we keep abortion SEPERATE from public healthcare as its distasteful {im talking about teen pregnancy, early months, life saving etc. not things like partial birth abortion here} to the mindless mahjority of conservative americans. still it isnt a LUXURY PROCEDURE, its a healthcare issue. and should be treated as such and people should not be exempted from paying tax mponey used to deal with the issue{ill try and elaborate more on the dangers of society paying selective taxes later if i have time. it more serious than most people realise and already happens in many guises}

erm did i succeed in substantiating it now? 😕

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is not an abortion debate, it is an allocation of taxes debate, and you have failed to substantiate why some taxpayers should be forced to fund things they are opposed to while others are not.

You ****ing lying *******.

If you really answer all questions answer this one, now, shouldn't be a problem:

Why is the argument "I don't want to pay for it" applicable to Public Funded Abortion, but not aggressive wars waged by my country?

Originally posted by Bardock42
You ****ing lying *******.

If you really answer all questions answer this one, now, shouldn't be a problem:

Why is the argument "I don't want to pay for it" applicable to Public Funded Abortion, but not aggressive wars waged by my country?

heres your answer. because we are the worlds premier superpower, and we have to go out and kickass or we risk losing that title. taxes, unfortunately must pay for these wars. I dont like this, but this is how it is.

some woman getting knocked up and deciding she doesnt want to have a baby? fugg her. she knew the risk going in, so I aint gonna pay for her stupid error in judgement. I am willing to bet that most of them didnt even attempt to use birth control.

clear enough? do you need flash cards?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
heres your answer. because we are the worlds premier superpower, and we have to go out and kickass or we risk losing that title. taxes, unfortunately must pay for these wars. I dont like this, but this is how it is.

some woman getting knocked up and deciding she doesnt want to have a baby? fugg her. she knew the risk going in, so I aint gonna pay for her stupid error in judgement. I am willing to bet that most of them didnt even attempt to use birth control.

clear enough? do you need flash cards?

No, that's not arguments for why all people should ahve to pay. That's arguments why you prefer the one over the other. Also shallow answers, because we all know you'd still be the superpower if you hadn't attacked Iraq.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, that's not arguments for why all people should ahve to pay. That's arguments why you prefer the one over the other. Also shallow answers, because we all know you'd still be the superpower if you hadn't attacked Iraq.
but if we didnt attack Iraq, we'd risk losing face.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
but if we didnt attack Iraq, we'd risk losing face.

What? No! How?

Originally posted by Bardock42
What? No! How?
hey, like I said, I am not the ultimate patriot, this is just how it is.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
hey, like I said, I am not the ultimate patriot, this is just how it is.

How? HOW!? ****ING HOW!!???!!!

Originally posted by Bardock42
How? HOW!? ****ING HOW!!???!!!
zanex, man....you need lots and lots of zanex.

i heard that obama wants to give tax breaks and awards/grants to abortion patients. DOH THEM LIBRLS!!!

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
zanex, man....you need lots and lots of zanex.
IT's just not true.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
erm did i succeed in substantiating it now? 😕

That side of the argument does not need substantiating.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That side of the argument does not need substantiating.

Haha, just my thought.

Originally posted by Bardock42
IT's just not true.
yes, afraid so.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
heres your answer. because we are the worlds premier superpower, and we have to go out and kickass or we risk losing that title. taxes, unfortunately must pay for these wars. I dont like this, but this is how it is.

some woman getting knocked up and deciding she doesnt want to have a baby? fugg her. she knew the risk going in, so I aint gonna pay for her stupid error in judgement. I am willing to bet that most of them didnt even attempt to use birth control.

clear enough? do you need flash cards?

your opinion is valid. completely idiotic, childish, selfish, and baseless, but hey...free country.

Re: Public Funding for Abortion

Universal health care is a joke, as is Obama and Edwards for the public funding of abortion.

Re: Re: Public Funding for Abortion

Originally posted by KidRock
Universal health care is a joke, as is Obama and Edwards for the public funding of abortion.

you're either rich or retarded then. perhaps both.

Originally posted by Schecter
your opinion is valid. completely idiotic, childish, selfish, and baseless, but hey...free country.
then disprove it.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
then disprove it.

people here whine when anyone tears up an arguments logical flaws. whatever.
an opinion can certainly be based on nothing logical. its commonly known as a brain fart.

Originally posted by Schecter
people here whine when anyone tears up an arguments logical flaws. whatever.
an opinion can certainly be based on nothing logical. its commonly known as a brain fart.
thats what I thought.