Eating pork · General Discussion Forum

Creshosk Senior Member

Originally posted by chithappens
Same as with global warming, there are different sources for this stuff.

And neither that nor this is a matter of opinion.

Originally posted by chithappens
How anyone can know anything about the insides of a pig and think otherwise is funny to me but ok.

What's funny is that its the people who have dealt with the insides of a pig say they can be poisoned.

Originally posted by chithappens
I'm not attacking you. Please refrain from doing such to me.

Where am I attacking you?

You ARE desperatly trying to hang onto your prejudiced beliefs. Its the turth, not an attack. If you feel attacked then you should seriously reconsider your position.

Originally posted by chithappens
Look into what is inside a pig.

Not much different than what's inside you. Organs, circulatory system, blood etc.

Only difference is is that pig is the adjective that you'd put infront of them rather than human in your case.

The ones who have looked into the pig disagree with you and your supposed books. Books which convienently enough are the source of your claims so you don't have to back them up.

Even without you proving your claims they've already been debunked.

PITT_HAPPENS "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by chithappens
Same as with global warming, there are different sources for this stuff. How anyone can know anything about the insides of a pig and think otherwise is funny to me but ok.
I'm not attacking you. Please refrain from doing such to me.
Look into what is inside a pig.

Way to skip my posts, and actually ingesting snake venom if very different than being injected with it due to the acids in the digestive system. Please tell us the book that you read that says what you are claiming or do a search on the web to find some thing to back up your statement, until then you are just talking BS. My sources come from experts, personal accounts and from the veterinary society that does the test, hell my wife have done them as part of her medical training.

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by chithappens
Pigs cant be poisoned because they are that damn nasty. If a snake bites a pig, the snake gets poisoned LOL.
That's wild

Besides being bullshit as others have said... how does that prove that a "pig is nasty", if anything, it proves that they're a resilient species.

Edit: Are you a diabetic by chance?

chithappens Senior Member

I consider personal accounts more important than "expert" opinion. After general facts are known then other stuff can become skewed.

*This is a very lazy paraphrasing.

"Part of what is known as a general fact is that pigs have things in their bodies most other animals don't have, partially because of the enviornment they like to dwell in - dark, wet, and dirty places. In a lazy example, they roll in mud a lot; mud contains lots of bacteria and the such, gets absorbed into their pores and as a result, they are immune to certain things (similar to antibotics; dead virus enters the body and immune system then builds up defenses)."

Pigs get infected easily but that is not the same as poisoning.

Plenty of things are messed up if you simply go by official books and the such. Historians certainly know this to be true.

A lot of things have certain benefits to them. Like why is it when "experts" recommend all these diets, they never mention that you could cut out a meal a day and be just as healthy (and actually more healthy)? No one NEEDS three meals a day. Even people playing sports do not NEED three meals a day.

Damn near anything with food and medicine ends up falsified.

And no, I am not a diabetic.

Robtard Senor Member

Many animals roll in mud, Elephants cover themselves in it when available to both help keep cool and to keep parasites away. I don't think "mud rolling" = Immunity to poison.

Still, how is being immune to poison make a pig dirty/filthy/unclean?

Im fairly certain horses are immune to rattlesnake poison as far as it won't kill them, are they "nasty" because of this?

Creshosk Senior Member

Originally posted by chithappens
I consider personal accounts more important than "expert" opinion. After general facts are known then other stuff can become skewed.

Yet you disregard the personal accounts of those who say that pigs can be poisoned? Nice.

Originally posted by chithappens
*This is a very lazy paraphrasing.
"Part of what is known as a general fact is that pigs have things in their bodies most other animals don't have,

like the four stomaches that sheep and cows have?

Originally posted by chithappens
partially because of the enviornment they like to dwell in - dark, wet, and dirty places. In a lazy example, they roll in mud a lot; mud contains lots of bacteria and the such, gets absorbed into their pores and as a result, they are immune to certain things (similar to antibotics; dead virus enters the body and immune system then builds up defenses)."
Pigs get infected easily but that is not the same as poisoning.

And this has to do with what exactly?

So they can be infected easily yet they are supposedly immune to the bacteria in the mud they live in?

Sounds like two different clashing stories to me.

Originally posted by chithappens
Plenty of things are messed up if you simply go by official books and the such. Historians certainly know this to be true.

So now you're attacking your own sources? Nice.

Originally posted by chithappens
A lot of things have certain benefits to them. Like why is it when "experts" recommend all these diets, they never mention that you could cut out a meal a day and be just as healthy (and actually more healthy)? No one NEEDS three meals a day. Even people playing sports do not NEED three meals a day.

Oh I get it you're trying to attack the testimonies of the experts who have done as you've told me to.. looked inside the pigs themselves.

Nice bit of double standard you set up.

Originally posted by chithappens
Damn near anything with food and medicine ends up falsified.

Like claims of pork products being unclean? How many people have eaten clean pork their entire lives and never suffered for it?

You're floundering. This post is inconsistant not only with your other posts but with itself as well. You're very desperatly trying to hang onto your prejudiced beliefs now.

PITT_HAPPENS "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by chithappens
I consider personal accounts more important than "expert" opinion. After general facts are known then other stuff can become skewed.
*This is a very lazy paraphrasing.
"Part of what is known as a general fact is that pigs have things in their bodies most other animals don't have, partially because of the enviornment they like to dwell in - dark, wet, and dirty places. In a lazy example, they roll in mud a lot; mud contains lots of bacteria and the such, gets absorbed into their pores and as a result, they are immune to certain things (similar to antibotics; dead virus enters the body and immune system then builds up defenses)."
Pigs get infected easily but that is not the same as poisoning.
Plenty of things are messed up if you simply go by official books and the such. Historians certainly know this to be true.
A lot of things have certain benefits to them. Like why is it when "experts" recommend all these diets, they never mention that you could cut out a meal a day and be just as healthy (and actually more healthy)? No one NEEDS three meals a day. Even people playing sports do not NEED three meals a day.
Damn near anything with food and medicine ends up falsified.
And no, I am not a diabetic.

Dogs do not have sweat glands, which is why they pant, kangaroos lick themselves to cool them selves off, cows burp methane gas, chickens are feed other chickens and I could keep going on.

As for your example of “experts” and diets, most of them are trying to sell a product which is their diet so a very poor example. The difference is my information is coming directly from the veterinary medical community, the ones that actually work on pigs you know like medicine, surgery and medical testing. I would rely more on them then anyone laymen that did a little reading on the internet or books that think they can diagnoses their pets’ condition which is normally way the hell off, ask any vet this. That is why they ask them their symptoms and not what do you think it is?

debbiejo Dreamer

parasites are in you....bwaaah

They're all over hooking into your digestive tract and maybe even someones brain on here, oh and livers too...........yummy pork

EkinEku Senior Member

The real reason they hate pigs in the middle east is because their staple there was wheat, and pigs used to eat it all the time. They also lacked sweat glands and consumed lots of water which caused problems for their crops, the drinking of urine pigs do is gross so i guess that attributes to it, but i like bacon. I don't really get down with the other stuff.

PITT_HAPPENS "Pitt Happens"

Originally posted by EkinEku
The real reason they hate pigs in the middle east is because their staple there was wheat, and pigs used to eat it all the time. They also lacked sweat glands and consumed lots of water which caused problems for their crops, the drinking of urine pigs do is gross so i guess that attributes to it, but i like bacon. I don't really get down with the other stuff.

I have to say that I haven’t heard about the urine thing, I’ll have to check that out but that is not surprising at all. Many animals eat their own waste or vomit as with cows and dogs just to name a few.

dadudemon Senior Member

On Thanksgiving Day, I do not eat turkey, I eat Pig because turkey does not taste as good to me.

Also, pigs have been used to grow organs for humans.

Pigs are very smart animals...some even consider them to be right up there with Dolphins.

The "laws" or guidelines set forth in religion when it came to pork came from several different angles...some of which had to do with no knowledge of modern medicine and how that relates to food prep. Those laws are now archaic.

Chithappens, an athlete should eat 6 or more times a day and those meals should be carefully prepared. Pick up any fitness or bodybuilding magazine. Also, I am walking proof that 6 meals are better than 2 or 3. I have some before pictures and I am just about done with my diet and I will then post my after pictures. The only difference was my diet.

lil bitchiness -

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I've always wondered why pigs and pork have a bad rep. They're the posterchild for unclean food among religions. I've known Jews and Muslims who break every dietary law.....except pork, it's the one they'll follow without exception. Some Jews will eat sushi, and some Muslims will drink, but no they won't touch "swine's flesh". It's really funny and hypocritical if you ask me.
There was no refridgeration, Reynold's wrap or USDA when the Torah or the Koran were written. Dietary laws are obsolete.

Yeah, I was about to mention refrigeration. Plus, they all lived in extremely hot places. Eating pork would have made some people sick too, but obviously due to poor handling, and lack of refrigeration (and thus pork goes off quickly)

anaconda Jukebox

Eating pork

mans right to do !!!!! morons oppose this though

yvonnekarate Frank Sinatra fan

No. Simply because I don't like the taste of pork.

Regards, Yvonne

WrathfulDwarf THE LOOSE CANNON

Whoah! There is a lot of Food threads lately. 😑

Anywhoo....Pork....cook it right and it's delicious.

yvonnekarate Frank Sinatra fan

It has nothing to do with that. I simply find it gross.

Regards, Yvonne

WrathfulDwarf THE LOOSE CANNON

Originally posted by yvonnekarate
It has nothing to do with that. I simply find it gross.
Regards, Yvonne

Add some Ketchup...it will taste better.

moviefanatik Junior Member

personally I dont eat pork, not for religious reasons, but because I just decided to stop many years ago and to begin to eat it again would probably make me sick . I do remember its taste and it was good, however its just not for me any more, plus you must cook it very well in order not to get parasites.........

yvonnekarate Frank Sinatra fan

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Add some Ketchup...it will taste better.

On pork? No thanks. It doesn't help either way.

Regards, Yvonne