Originally posted by Peach
Half the time when you report something, assuming that it's not a complete non-issue to begin with, from what I've seen you've started it, with baiting comments. How can you claim that people are out to get you?And what, do you admit that you troll pretty much constantly, then? I'll tell you what I've said dozens of times before - it does not matter who started it. If you retaliate, you are equally guilty. "He started it" stops working when you get to be older than five years old.
Most of what you report is not against any rules. It's as simple as that. Disagreeing with someone is neither trolling nor flaming.
Also, if you had a bit of common sense, you would know that we can use our best judgment to nip things in the bud before they get to the point where rules are getting broken. Arguing tends to lead to nothing but hostility, so we like to stop it before it gets to that point.
However? Arguing with a mod when they tell you to not do something? Is breaking a rule. So when I say stop arguing and drop it, then I expect that to actually happen.
Depends what you call a baiting comment, and people are openly out to get me lol, they admit it half the time so how could you say I am not being attacked?
Not really, in crime if someone attacks you and you end up killing them out of self defence, your sentence is always shorter than if you did it intentially and planned it yourself. Not that I know much on law, if I did I could probably come out with a lot of good sentences.
I agree with that, disagreeing with someone is not breaking any rules.
Not by the rules you cannot, by the rules your here to enforce rules, simple as, not stop something before it happens because you do you have precog. Hell something between two members could be a private joke. Its not exactley within your duty as mod to stop them even if you think it seems less benign.
Whats funny is I did not argue with you when you told me to do something, you told me to drop argueing about what makes an insult or a bash. I have done so, then you asked me a question which I answered which created a new argument, so technically you are disturbing the peace 😉 although i think your bending the role of moderator a bit, your job is about enforcing the rules, I think when it states that you cannot argue with a mod when they ask you to do something it entails offical orders based on breaking a rule. Otherwise you could ask me to do something ridiculous or pointless and warn me for not doing it.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Depends what you call a baiting comment, and people are openly out to get me lol, they admit it half the time so how could you say I am not being attacked?Not really, in crime if someone attacks you and you end up killing them out of self defence, your sentence is always shorter than if you did it intentially and planned it yourself. Not that I know much on law, if I did I could probably come out with a lot of good sentences.
I agree with that, disagreeing with someone is not breaking any rules.
Not by the rules you cannot, by the rules your here to enforce rules, simple as, not stop something before it happens because you do you have precog. Hell something between two members could be a private joke. Its not exactley within your duty as mod to stop them even if you think it seems less benign.
Whats funny is I did not argue with you when you told me to do something, you told me to drop argueing about what makes an insult or a bash. I have done so, then you asked me a question which I answered which created a new argument, so technically you are disturbing the peace 😉 although i think your bending the role of moderator a bit, your job is about enforcing the rules, I think when it states that you cannot argue with a mod when they ask you to do something it entails offical orders based on breaking a rule. Otherwise you could ask me to do something ridiculous or pointless and warn me for not doing it.
I don't care about how it works if you break a law. It's not the same case here. It is far easier to just walk away from and ignore someone who starts things. Hence why there is no sympathy for anyone who continues and they also get in trouble.
And I'm just going to state this. You do not know our jobs. At all. I've been a mod going on four years now. I know exactly what I can and cannot do - you do not. Got it?
Also, no, not quite. I told you to stop arguing and then you began arguing with me as to whether or not I could do that (which I am well within my powers to do so). So drop it already.
Originally posted by PeachI wonder what are the new improvements.
http://guildwars2.com/en/😱 firefirefireph
FINALLY.
Well, I know there's a different level cap, more of an open persistent world, other races to play as, and PvP is going to be different.
...none of which I care a huge amount about, as I liked the low level cap and the fact that everything was instanced in the first one, there's only one non-human race I'm interested in, and I really don't play PvP.
But STILL. Finally some sort of info 😄 😄 😄