Originally posted by Rapidash
A wiki article about you is not supposed to be written by you. It's supposed to be written by the rest of the world. If you want the world to read you according to you, you make a website.No one should really write much about their own ways and personality, because you yourself rarely know how you work.
Your entries in the article aren't objective. The edited ones are. A wiki is supposed to be as far from biased as possible. It's supposed to contain information the public can rely on.
Although given your resigning from the wiki, my changes in your article will be minor. This for the reason that you're no longer participant in the expanding of the wiki site and thus' powerless.
If you don't approve of what's written, there's nothing more to it than neglect the existence of that article or keep yourself convinced that it's wrong.
In that case everyone who has written on their profile about themselves (almost everyone) remove it and have 100% input from other people 🙄 Your logic makes zero sense, its not logical that I dont write on my own page since i know more about myself than anyone else.
Not true and almost everyone has.
😆 public can rely on? a few trolling bias from haters is apprently objective? ridiculous.
I am both not only convinced but certain its just a trolls/haters resource on me and I will indeed neglect its existence as well.
Originally posted by Peach
The evidence certainly showed it to be correct, though.And no one changed what you wrote other than to actually make it readable and proper English. Why don't you get that?
False, evidence showed what you wanted it to from your point of view.
Lie
Originally posted by Burning thought
In that case everyone who has written on their profile about themselves (almost everyone) remove it and have 100% input from other people 🙄 Your logic makes zero sense, its not logical that I dont write on my own page since i know more about myself than anyone else.Not true and almost everyone has.
😆 public can rely on? a few trolling bias from haters is apprently objective? ridiculous.
I am both not only convinced but certain its just a trolls/haters resource on me and I will indeed neglect its existence as well.
False, evidence showed what you wanted it to from your point of view.
Lie
You're proving it once more.
Originally posted by Burning thought
And your proving that I am correct once more, so at least we have something in common little one.
I've always given your ability to reflect yourself in third person the benefit of the doubt, because people do indeed hate you and chances are high that they are bias (So don't take it out on me). However, the further both this discussion and past ones about your ways has gone on, the more it's been clear that you lack the capability to properly evaluate yourself.
Not only that, but you can't stand the idea that people view you in a negative way without making it absolutely clear that you, who is the best to judge your character, disagrees and won't go down without a fight.
A fight that generally end with people giving up for the exact same reasons that you stand accused for.
You're an ignoramus. You seek safety Anna Freud-style. It's not within your capability to realize this, but your character is both biased and egocentric.
I personally don't see a problem in that. Many people are and most can't help being so, but that's what you are, no matter if you acknowledge it or not.
You can say you aren't. We can say you aren't. Even should you convince us, you still are, even if none of us disagree.
It's a psychological fact. You can fight us, but not the nature of the human mind. Which is exactly what you're doing. Your incapability to counter your subconscious behaviour has you counter us instead.
It's simply human.
Originally posted by Rapidash
I've [b]always given your ability to reflect yourself in third person the benefit of the doubt, because people do indeed hate you and chances are high that they are bias (So don't take it out on me). However, the further both this discussion and past ones about your ways has gone on, the more it's been clear that you lack the capability to properly evaluate yourself.Not only that, but you can't stand the idea that people view you in a negative way without making it absolutely clear that you, who is the best to judge your character, disagrees and won't go down without a fight.
A fight that generally end with people giving up for the exact same reasons that you stand accused for.You're an ignoramus. You seek safety Anna Freud-style. It's not within your capability to realize this, but your character is both biased and egocentric.
I personally don't see a problem in that. Many people are and most can't help being so, but that's what you are, no matter if you acknowledge it or not.You can say you aren't. We can say you aren't. Even should you convince us, you still are, even if none of us disagree.
It's a psychological fact. You can fight us, but not the nature of the human mind. Which is exactly what you're doing. Your incapability to counter your subconscious behaviour has you counter us instead.It's simply human. [/B]
Baseless statement, I clearly evaluated myself fairly and with objectiveness in mind. I have the best idea of myself and other people have written their statements on themselves. Theyve not had anyone come in reversing everything they have said.
People have to give up because theyve not got a real argument, they just hate on me because thats all they know. They can rarely give examples. And I agree I am viewed negatively, I said so on my page afterall.
False, its a fact youve concluded, no basis whatsoever. Now put your petty hate aside and grow up please.