Originally posted by General Kaliero
How so?Peach says that claiming anything that disagrees with oneself to be bashing or trolling is self-absorbed.
You agree.
As numerous "reports" show this to be your number one reason for reporting something, you are by this opinion (which you said you share) self-absorbed.
Since you have said this yourself, you are therefore admitting that you are self-absorbed.
Simple deductive logic, without any circular or deceptive "reasoning."
Ah but you see this is where your wrong, I agree to what she said, I did not say I agree that I do indeed do the things that make someone self absorbed in her eyes. Thats where your perception was off.
So no, I do not agree I am self absorbed.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Ah but you see this is where your wrong, I agree to what she said, I did not say I agree that I do indeed do the things that make someone self absorbed in her eyes. Thats where your perception was off.So no, I do not agree I am self absorbed.
What you did agree with is that such an action is self-absorbed.
Therefore, while it obviously was not your intention (Burning thought admitting he's flawed? What a laugh!), you most certainly called yourself self-absorbed.
Originally posted by General Kaliero
Now you're twisting things. That you report people who disagree with you under a vague, empty accusation of "trolling" is an empirical fact, regardless of what you did or did not agree with.What you did agree with is that such an action is self-absorbed.
Therefore, while it obviously was not your intention (Burning thought admitting he's flawed? What a laugh!), you most certainly called yourself self-absorbed.
Sorry but no, your under the assumption I am reporting them under that for the sake they are disagreeing with me. if that were true I would be reporting most posts. I report things that I feel baited by, whether you see it as such is irrelvent in this conversation because you argued what I agree with remember?
So no, wrong again 😉
Originally posted by Burning thought
Sorry but no, your under the assumption I am reporting them under that for the sake they are disagreeing with me. if that were true I would be reporting most posts. I report things that I feel baited by, whether you see it as such is irrelvent in this conversation because you argued what I agree with remember?So no, wrong again 😉
Originally posted by General Kaliero
Sorry, but your opinion does not equate to fact. That you feel "baited" by simple disagreement, as if other debaters are out personally to "get you," is only more evidence of your self-absorption.
Sorry but your opinion does not equate to fact either. You just repeated your sad little argument again despite me outlining that if I reported on nothing but a disagreement, I would be reporting most pages in games vs....
The fact of the matter is, 90% of your reports are completely baseless and, from looking at the posts in question, are about people who have done nothing more than disagree.
Anyway, I've made the first of the GW character pages. I will also, at the very least, make ones for the Undead Lich, Togo, Shiro, Kormir, and Varesh, which will cover the main good and evil characters from each campaign, and possibly some of the other (slightly less major but still important) NPCs.
Originally posted by Peach
The fact of the matter is, 90% of your reports are completely baseless and, from looking at the posts in question, are about people who have done nothing more than disagree.Anyway, I've made the first of the GW character pages. I will also, at the very least, make ones for the Undead Lich, Togo, Shiro, Kormir, and Varesh, which will cover the main good and evil characters from each campaign, and possibly some of the other (slightly less major but still important) NPCs.
Another example of your lack of perception, a large majority of people who actually have done it have also admitted to trolling me before anyway. I think this is one of those things a moderator ignores if they also get amusement from it but I dont really care. I dont report disagreements, if you think they are baseless then thats lovely but it does not work in your argument for my apprently "self absorbed" personality.
Originally posted by Burning thought
Another example of your lack of perception, a large majority of people who actually have done it have also admitted to trolling me before anyway. I think this is one of those things a moderator ignores if they also get amusement from it but I dont really care. I dont report disagreements, if [b]you think they are baseless then thats lovely but it does not work in your argument for my apprently "self absorbed" personality. [/B]
I'll just leave it at this.
Most of what you report as trolling is nothing of the sort.
Originally posted by Burning thought
And ill leave it as:According to your understanding of it 😉
Some do prize the worth of the last word highly. Protecting the self really is important to you.
Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Yeah, I've pretty much always used hotmail. Guess that would explain it. 🙁So um.. would using my AIM name work then? If not, guess I'll make a yahoo or gmail account if need be.
AIM should work.