Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Youve misunderstood something along the lines but w/e, it will probably be bias and wont rectify the situation. To the other thread!

Pointing out that you talk about your own rules is not bias. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it does.

Well, it makes sense to have a certain ruling in one place otherwise pointless debates about different interpretations would happen everywhere (as they do anyways I'm sure). I mean, even if the rules go against your interpretation, you could argue under those circumstances, no? I guess the fundamental question is "Why are you arguing", which everyone should ask themselves! Is it to be right, or to exercise some sort of debating muscle, or to convince others, or etc. and then one should consider whether the technicalities are really that important to them.

I can't help but wonder what's goin' down. Surely, the fate of Games Vs rests on the shoulders of this decision.

And the funniest part is that's probably true.

Originally posted by Peach
Pointing out that you talk about your own rules is not bias. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it does.

INCONCEIVABLE!!!

Their not mine, its used by many and your bias against my view is clear, your standpoint is not fair or neutral.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Is it to be right or to convince others, or etc. and then one should consider whether the technicalities are really that important to them.

Those two are my goals in a general debate, on KMC is just to state facts and if facts are unclear like in this case, to trade logic. The technicalities of an event can be very important.

Originally posted by Bardock42
INCONCEIVABLE!!!

Life is pain, highness! Anyone that says otherwise is selling something.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Their not mine, its used by many and your bias against my view is clear, your standpoint is not fair or neutral.

Actually, the way we intend to do this, is very much fair and neutral.

I don't think so, BT. Peach and GK rarely even get involved in our squabbles. The only way their anymore biased against you than me is that they appear, to me, to disagree or argue with you more.

Jolly good....

Originally posted by Peach
Actually, the way we intend to do this, is very much fair and neutral.

Flip a coin?

Flipping a coin isn't neutral. Heads has a natural inclination due to more weight.

Or so I'm told.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Flipping a coin isn't neutral. Heads has a natural inclination due to more weight.

Or so I'm told.

Well, I said "flip a coin", not "flip a quarter", now did I?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Flip a coin?

D20, actually 😄

...

no, not really.

Originally posted by Peach
D20, actually 😄

...

no, not really.

You and GK should make D&D character each, one called "Toonforce" the other "Real Wordl Physics" then you battle each other, winner becomes the rule

That would be epic.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You and GK should make D&D character each, one called "Toonforce" the other "Real Wordl Physics" then you battle each other, winner becomes the rule

That would be epic.

That just made me laugh far more than it should have...

Or maybe we'll have Rianna and Dak duel and the winner decides 😛

Originally posted by Wei Phoenix
Mewtwo vs Magneto anyone? 😖hifty:

That thread was debated in Cross Genre.

And I still think Mewtwo wins, I just can't prove it within the standards required for the threads.

YouTube video

😕

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
YouTube video

😕

****ing sick people. SICK!!!

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
YouTube video

😕