Originally posted by quanchi1121. Yeah Ryu can do that. Akuma and Gouken leveled a mountain range with their Hadoukens. And Akuma punched an island, that had a mountain range, and sank/destroyed it. And Akuma punched Ayers Rock, a mountain, and split it into four pieces. And Akuma kicked a sunken ship in half, destroying a nearby submarine with the force of the shockwave, he did this while carrying the ship in a few seconds from the ocean trench to above the surface. Oh and Akuma annihilated a forest with a flex of his power, which actually went out to space. Don't argue against something unless you actually no what he has done.
How about blowing up a military chopper completely by one shang tsung fireball.Like akuma can't be killed by spikes if he fell on them. Laughs.
You feat arguers always make me chuckle.
2. Akuma has been portrayed as fighting inside a volcano, and training at the bottom of an ocean trench. Considering he and people his level output enough force to destroy mountains or islands, no, he cannot be harmed by spikes.
3. Ah, right, "portrayal." Alucard from the Hellsing series is portrayed as virtually invincible. He would not be so in DC or Marvel. For another example, Onaga from Mortal Kombat is portrayed as being more or less unstoppable in single kombat (Heehee), is the same true if you put him in the Marvel universe?
Originally posted by quanchi112Mortal Kombat vs. DC is not only noncanon, but Superman was explicitly weakened in MK, as were the other fighters. In fact, everyone's power was in flux, displayed by Joker getting a power boost while some others were weaker. But if you want to use noncanon examples, Akuma has leaped into space and shattered a meteor the size of the moon.
Punch from captain marvel or ww I'd imagine is greater than that. Need we continue ?
Originally posted by quanchi1121. Sure, some can have their throats slit, by similarly superhuman characters with a sufficiently durable blade. But Ryu tapping into the Satsui No Hadou was shown to be explicitly immune to bullets, and pretty much anything else sent at him. Also, that is what we call a bad portrayal. When Akuma and Gouken fight, mountain ranges are destroyed.
Because these characters can have their throats slit, etc. take brad pitt as achilles from troy. He threw a spear hundreds of yards with ease showcasing ridiculous strength and skill but his sword strikes weren't knocking people back multiple feet or anything.It's the same thing with Akuma I am sure. His feats are awesome I am sure but if he falls into spikes from 100 feet he'd die.
2. Yes because even though a person weaker than him was explicitly shown to have superhuman durability, Akuma would die right? Ignoring the fact that Akuma has himself displayed absurd amounts of durability.
Originally posted by quanchi112The spikes would dent on his skin. Akuma is much too durable for mere iron spikes to harm him.
Do you honestly think anyone on the street fighter team who dreamed him up in any of these games would say that falling 100 feet into spikes would only mildly irritate him.
Originally posted by MooCowofJusticeHe is one of the most successful entertainers in the world and currently one of the most spoken of. He has been and might still be THE most well paid TV actor in the world. He has walked out of more courts on the winning side than most, if not all here has even been to court 😛 He has a lovely child and he's able to get a girl pretty much with the snap of his finger.
Charlie Sheen is not an actual winner. You know that, right?
Now I'm not saying that's what define winner. It's not an absolute definition. It's a definition though and something most would, any category of the listed, consider winning. Because it's Charlie Sheen though . . . Many don't 😛 Which is bias.
He willed himself out of alcoholism!
Originally posted by MooCowofJusticeCharlie Sheen has not gotten many hugs lately.
The weak are not winners. Only losers like hugs. Losers are weak. That's why they lose.
Originally posted by NephthysGoing with Peach on this one. Stop abusing that word 😛 It's used so frequently for the wrong purposes that it's actually indirectly affecting the homosexual population in a negative way.
Ash is gay. And he loses alot.
Originally posted by MooCowofJusticeYet it's Charizard that's gotten Ash out of some of the tightest positions he's been in 😛 Also Charizard does what he wants and not what his master asks of him. I dare consider that being something of a winner. Rebel against authority! 😄
Loser. Charizard is lame and overrated anyway.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice- Pikachu fried an army of birds and hold countless feats where he's defeated the odds. He's a greater warrior than John McClane 😛
Yeah. 😐 Losers. All of 'em.
Originally posted by MooCowofJusticeI get it now. You're trolling 😄 Took me long enough 😐
I wasn't aware I had to prove that I thought those people were losers.
I'm not naive. I'm just a little out of my element. Not used to people behaving in such a way 😛
A modern day interpretation of Hamlet could be any of a number of things. If you want to include a little satire you could have it revolve around religion. It is for example not allowed by the Qu'ran for a Muslim woman to be with a Christian man, or any non-Muslim man for that matter. This as it states in the Qu'ran that a Muslim man can marry any female from the "people of the book", while a woman may only marry a Muslim man. Islam is hip these days 🙂
Another popular current theme would be politics. The son and daughter of two prominent political party leaders. One high left party and one high right party. Both parties could be vast public figures. Politics is very current 😛
Originally posted by TheAuraAngelIsn't that the purpose of interpreting a Shakespearian play? To have it resemble in whole but deviate in terms of setting and character? 😛
?Those ideas sound like another Shakespeare piece. 😛
Edit: Oh and it is worth mentioning that I am presenting this modern interpretation as a screen writer who wants to get his movie made.
You'd be surprised how many movies are based on other movies, old plays or books. Without giving their source of inspiration credit of course ✅
Originally posted by Pinkie Pie
Alotta shit.
I dunno about trolling. But was I completely serious? Nah.
But I maintain that those Pokemon and people are losers. With the obvious exception of Captain America that you all overlooked. Considering you showed examples of him in a hug with two separate.
I also maintain that there is a difference between a person that has won something and a winner.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I dunno about trolling. But was I completely serious? Nah.But I maintain that those Pokemon and people are losers. With the obvious exception of Captain America that you all overlooked. Considering you showed examples of him in a hug with two separate.
I also maintain that there is a difference between a person that has won something and a winner.
Hello Queeny.
Yeah....no. Not really a counter argument. Also, pretty sure any PPG could absolutely stomp Ol' Captain America. Don't know his feats though. 😛
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I think that's Captain America, the guy who is to superheroes what Edward Cullen is to vampires.
I don't follow this analogy.
edit: No, no PPG could beat Cap. Cap's power is directly tied to whoever he is fighting. His main power is opponent +1. Sometimes, very rarely, that power malfunctions.