Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

I should get that tatooed on my forehead.

Only losers fail to understand the awesome that is a hug.

I'd have to be weak to be a loser. In which case, yeah, I'd probably hug people.

Either you wernt hugged as a child, never had a chickhug or never had a GARmanhug >__>

If any I pity you, Mr.Moo.

Neph, go watch the FMA movie. Go go.

Yeah, it's none of that. Your pity is not received.

Neph, go watch the FMA movie. Go go.

No, I'm watching Brotherhood. Season one can kiss my ass. >:[

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I'd have to be weak to be a loser. In which case, yeah, I'd probably hug people.

I love contradictions like these.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Hugs are for the weak.

Since I said only losers fail to understand the awesome that is a hug, and you attributed weak with losers instead of winners, that means the strong like hugs.

You sure about that?

Indeed. Several winners like hugs don't cha know?

Charlie Sheen is not an actual winner. You know that, right?

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Charlie Sheen is not an actual winner. You know that, right?

Who do you consider a winner?

Me.

Impossible. As only winners like hugs.

The weak are not winners. Only losers like hugs. Losers are weak. That's why they lose.

Do you consider Pokemon winners? Do you consider Pokemon weak?

Before you go any further, there is a difference between a winner and a person/creature that wins something.

That said, depending on the Pokemon, yes.

Charizard? Winner, loser?

Will point out inherit flaws in your argument later, dun worry.

Loser. Charizard is lame and overrated anyway.

How about these guys?

Ash is gay. And he loses alot.