Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by RE: Blaxican3,949 pages

You can admit that you suck at multiplayer games Moo. It took me two years of summer school from failing middle school to get good at them.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
I could play the first mount and blade on my laptop at an ok 25 fps, when i tried the expansion warband...for some reason it was too much. i could run it at maybe 15 fps on average... 🙁
Wat? there's little difference in power between the three only that Warband has better textures. Try the demo of WFS to see if its different.

Originally posted by Phanteros
Wat? there's little difference in power between the three only that Warband has better textures. Try the demo of WFS to see if its different.

i turned the settings down as low as possible for Warband to match it with the main game, and it still would not run as well.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
You can admit that you suck at multiplayer games Moo. It took me two years of summer school from failing middle school to get good at them.

I only suck a fighting games. I don't buy shooters because they are easy and boring and basically all the same.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I only suck a fighting games. I don't buy shooters because they are easy and boring and basically all the same.
Try Bulletstorm. mmm

Is fun.

So Moo, why do you play Pokemon?

Zing.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
So Moo, why do you play Pokemon?

Zing.

Fun RPG with strong multiplayer competitive scene? o.o

I've had way more difficulty winning several Pokemon matches than ever in any shooting game.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I've had way more difficulty winning several Pokemon matches than ever in any shooting game.
Try Half Life 2 or Bulletstorm or something. ARE FUN SHOOTERS.

bulletstorm was shit, imo Itw as fun for like, the first twenty minutes.

Also pokemon like all turn based games takes no skill. Just time.

Half Life 2 is PC though. And I don't even know what Bulletstorm is. Not to mention I need to save shit up for better games. Like inFamous 2 and Skyward Sword.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
bulletstorm was shit.

Also pokemon like all turn based games takes no skill. Just time.

Blax it amazes me every time exactly HOW BAD your opinion really is. I mean, wow man, your opinion is garbage, possibly as bad as Moo's.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Half Life 2 is PC though.

Actually no.

It's on The Orange Box for the PS3 and 360 along with 4 other games

Originally posted by NemeBro
Blax it amazes me every time exactly HOW BAD your opinion really is. I mean, wow man, your opinion is garbage, possibly as bad as Moo's.
I agree, my opinion sucks. I don't state opinions, though. I only state facts, like Quan.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Also pokemon like all turn based games takes no skill. Just time.

Play Persona 3 then get back to me kthx

So Mass Effect 2's PS3 price needs to drop another thirty dollars so I can actually try it.

That or the video store here needs to get it's ass around and get a copy I can rent. Preferably this option.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
I could play the first mount and blade on my laptop at an ok 25 fps, when i tried the expansion warband...for some reason it was too much. i could run it at maybe 15 fps on average... 🙁
Well that sucks.

Originally posted by FinalAnswer
Play Persona 3 then get back to me kthx
I played the Persona games at the behest of Nephythis and Veneficus. Like I said...

I'm planing on getting Brink, already pre ordered Gears 3, and Infamous Hero Edition.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Fun RPG with strong multiplayer competitive scene? o.o

haven't seen you in awhile, are you still retired?