Originally posted by The ScenarioThe funny thing is you replied seriously to an obvious joke post where I stated youtube videos.
The first step is admitting you have a problem. While I help you with the importance of evidence, I hope I can also help you with your subtlety. I may not be the best at it, but I believe I may just be able to teach you enough.If I am lying now, I hope I can make it the truth soon enough.
Or links. For example, this one:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evidenceHmm. Quanchi, I don't see your definition there. Did you perhaps get it from another site? You said you looked it up, and I don't have any reason to disbelieve you. If you were give a source, that would be a great step forward.
I know sarcasm can seem like a cruel foreign language but not you too, scenario.
Originally posted by TheAuraAngelI post based on my awesome memory I don't search for youtube videos.
I distinctly remember one time where his trap was a complete success. And wouldn't you if you could split up with the hot chick and the not so hot chick that probably still puts out?It actually was not as bad as I initially thought. Pup Named Scooby Doo is still the best though.
1. YouTube videos are the only things one can qualify as evidence?
2. Since you do not post YouTube videos, you do not post evidence. Meaning that nothing you say has any evidence to back it up correct?
Originally posted by BloodRainMy interpretation is what happened the youtube videos and feats are dramatically slanted to how they are normally portrayed.
Nemesis does that? Oh thats a nasty image right there..''Screw what the game says, I have my own view on what happened.''
Originally posted by quanchi112
I post based on my awesome memory I don't search for youtube videos.My interpretation is what happened the youtube videos and feats are dramatically slanted to how they are normally portrayed.
So what your saying is that you have no tangible evidence backing any of your arguments. Which is fine in some cases I suppose but what if your word and Scenarios word were different. Who am I supposed to believe? ๐ฎ
Well what you are arguing is "Authorial Intent" dear sir. And while I am obviously a believer in it, authorial intent simply does not go far here without proof behind it. So I'm sorry to say that that argument holds no water here.
Originally posted by quanchi112
The funny thing is you replied seriously to an obvious joke post where I stated youtube videos.
Funny? Oh, no. Evidence is no laughing matter. I am always deadly serious.
I know sarcasm can seem like a cruel foreign language but not you too, scenario.
Oh, I hope you can forgive me for my grievous mistakes. Perhaps you can teach me more of this accursed tongue while I teach you how to correctly utilize evidence.
Originally posted by quanchi112You mean he couldn't perceive your sarcastic tone of text? Abhorring ๐ An illiterate and a monkey is what he is!
The funny thing is you replied seriously to an obvious joke post where I stated youtube videos.I know sarcasm can seem like a cruel foreign language but not you too, scenario.
I'll be honest though. I didn't get the joke either ๐
Originally posted by Pinkie Pie
You mean he couldn't perceive your sarcastic tone of text? Abhorring ๐ An illiterate and a monkey is what he is!I'll be honest though. I didn't get the joke either ๐
Hmm. I guess the short version would be that when I debate, I tend to post youtube videos as evidence (though I am hardly the only one to do this) to prove my points effectively.
Quanchi apparently hates this.
Scenario, seems like you've gotten a bit more.....aggressive since Ive been gone. Good to see youre still at it.
Good to see you, too, LLLLLink. I dunno about aggressive, though. Maybe I should tone it down...
Originally posted by The Scenario
Hmm. I guess the short version would be that when I debate, I tend to post youtube videos as evidence (though I am hardly the only one to do this) to prove my points effectively.Quanchi apparently hates this.
Good to see you, too, LLLLLink. I dunno about aggressive, though. Maybe I should tone it down...
The short version would be that when you debate you're WRONG!!!!11!!1!
I think he just hates YOU!!!
Yeah, maybe YOU should, jerk!
Note: Dunno why I'm directing repressed anger at you Scenario. Maybe it's cause Quan is no fun. Sorry for any offense.