Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by shin_gear3,949 pages

Nikk, you're just too butthorny to state you won an argument when it's hard to figure who "won" an argument that's based on opinion. ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

People don't answer to me, Lana. They answer to the topic.

YOu enter a debate and it's your requirement to back up your case.

If you flat out refuse to back up your case and start saying you're smarter than other people and everyone else is wrong, you are just being arrogant.

Originally posted by Lana
I don't understand why you think people need to answer to you. They don't.

And as I said, it's inexcusable. You do not act like that.

In a debate...THEY DO or else they forfeit. To Gear, Nik won, Fascist is a moron.

Originally posted by Lana
There's a time and place and on here is never the right place to go off like that. It's completely and totally inexcusable.

And if you get THAT pissed off over something completely irrelevant on the internet, you've got some problems.

Gotta give props to Lana.

*Brushes Lana's shulder*

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
In a debate...THEY DO or else they forfeit. To Gear, Nik won, Fascist is a moron.
Erm..as far as I'm concerned anyway it was the surface of Terra that was destroyed...only the surface was shown in ruins after Kuja's Ultima...in other words, it wasn't shown exploding...and even me and Prime used this to explain to Chaotic (I think you know who he is) why Kuja has shown more...interesting feats than Sephiroth.

Originally posted by Sol Valentine
Gotta give props to Lana.

*Brushes Lana's shulder*

Get your mitts of her b****!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

๐Ÿ˜  ๐Ÿ˜  ๐Ÿ˜ 

weep

Originally posted by shin_gear
Erm..as far as I'm concerned anyway it was the surface of Terra that was destroyed...only the surface was shown in ruins after Kuja's Ultima...in other words, it wasn't shown exploding...and even me and Prime used this to explain to Chaotic (I think you know who he is) why Kuja has shown more...interesting feats than Sephiroth.
I believe that too, but guess what, Nik asked for proof, Fascist being the conceited moron he is, just declared himself the winner, and ignored Nik. Also, Sol, shut up. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Bans here take a long time. lol

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
I believe that too, but guess what, Nik asked for proof, Fascist being the conceited moron he is, just declared himself the winner, and ignored Nik. Also, Sol, shut up. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Krackalalakalkalkalkalkalkalkalka!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by shin_gear
Get your mitts of her b****!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

๐Ÿ˜  ๐Ÿ˜  ๐Ÿ˜ 

weep

Teehee.

Originally posted by Shin_Nikkolas
People don't answer to me, Lana. They answer to the topic.

YOu enter a debate and it's your requirement to back up your case.

If you flat out refuse to back up your case and start saying you're smarter than other people and everyone else is wrong, you are just being arrogant.

And I still don't care. You had no right to act as you did.

See, here's a very novel concept for you. Use your ignore list. Then you never have to see anything that someone who annoys you posts again ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Originally posted by Lana
And I still don't care. You had no right to act as you did.

See, here's a very novel concept for you. Use your ignore list. Then you never have to see anything that someone who annoys you posts again ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

That would be copping out.

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
That would be copping out.

No it wouldn't.

Originally posted by Lana
And I still don't care. You had no right to act as you did.

See, here's a very novel concept for you. Use your ignore list. Then you never have to see anything that someone who annoys you posts again ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

You gotta give your props to Lana again. Reppin' chi-Town like Crazy!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Lana
No it wouldn't.
Yes, it would. If you are in a debate, and you just put them on ignore, you are copping out.

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
Yes, it would. If you are in a debate, and you just put them on ignore, you are copping out.

Since when is walking away from a situation or avoiding a person who is pissing you off copping out?

It's called not acting like a child.

Deal with it. I don't accept such behaviour when it can be so easily solved without having to get me involved.

Originally posted by Lana
Since when is walking away from a situation or avoiding a person who is pissing you off copping out?

It's called not acting like a child.

Deal with it. I don't accept such behaviour when it can be so easily solved without having to get me involved.

It's called debating, in debating team for your school you can't just walk out and ignore them.

Originally posted by Sol Valentine
You gotta give your props to Lana again. Reppin' chi-Town like Crazy!!!!!!!!

She's just blowin this tip off!!!!!!

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
It's called debating, in debating team for your school you can't just walk out and ignore them.

I was on the debate team in high school, actually, and I can say first-hand that nobody in this particular forum knows anything about how to truly debate, so you cannot even begin to compare the two.

Originally posted by Lana
I was on the debate team in high school, actually, and I can say first-hand that nobody in this particular forum knows anything about how to truly debate, so you cannot even begin to compare the two.
Really? Both debate, why not? You are avoiding the point. Also, I have seen people claiming to be on debate teams being pwned here, it's kinda funny.

C'mon, lets not debate about debating.