Wow, what a dumbass study, anyone who buys into it is truly a stupid animal who needs to be brought behind their house and shot.
The first question is not quite as bad, but it does not preclude the possibility of a man lumping rough-play into what the question is intending to ask, nor BDSM, which is not as uncommon as girlyboys with feline avatars that post on message boards might think.
The second question is just entirely nonsensical in wording, worded solely to mislead and confuse the men questioned. It does not preclude that, as Blax implied, both the man and woman being drunk (A distinct possibility my sons), and the wording would easily misdirect a lesser mind into lumping any encounter with a drunk girl.
But most importantly: 120 out of 1,883 is less than 1% of the men tested.
Hurhurhur.
I think its closer to 10% actually. 😐 And the first question specifically says 'if they do not cooperate'. Rough-play and BDSM are meant to be consensual. And the second question says 'if they did not want to'. You'd have to be pretty ****ing stupid to think either question was about consensual sex.
And nah, Blax. Thats totally cool.
Originally posted by Nephthys
I think its closer to 10% actually. 😐 And the first question specifically says 'if they do not cooperate'. Rough-play and BDSM are meant to be consensual. And the second question says 'if they did not want to'. You'd have to be pretty ****ing stupid to think either question was about consensual sex.And nah, Blax. Thats totally cool.
Doms prefer it when a sub resists. Aka, does not cooperate.
Are you ****ing high?
120 times 10 is 1200, so im not sure 120 is less than 1% of 1883.
The comments have some pretty stupid shit in it too.
" And that’s not all. 43%
of college men will
admit to using “coercive
behavior” to have sex
with a woman… which of
course is also rape.
Rape culture trains
sociopaths."
Like, what? How is that rape?
It's kind of worrying how our society seems to be doing everything it can to absolve women of personal responsibility. If you meet a man in a club and he buys you a drink and spits game that makes your panties wet, how is it not your fault for waking up in his bed the next day?
W-WTF? Coercing someone into sex is ****ing rape dipstick. Do you need to look up the definition of coercion? Its 'use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance. ' Not chatting someone up.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Doms prefer it when a sub resists. Aka, does not cooperate.Are you ****ing high?
Well...... thats ****ing rape bro. 😬
Unless the person gives consent before hand and makes it clear that its just a sex game with safe words and stuff naturally. AKA, 'cooperates'.
Originally posted by Nephthys
W-WTF? Coercing someone into sex is ****ing rape dipstick. Do you need to look up the definition of coercion?Well...... thats ****ing rape bro. 😬
Unless the person gives consent before hand and makes it clear that its just a sex game with safe words and stuff naturally. AKA, 'cooperates'.
You're pretty ****ing dumb bro.
It's less than 1%, and coercion is a very vague term son.
I don't think you understand, which makes sense, but the lack of cooperation is all part of the "game" in such a relationship fatboy.
You need to calm down and stop hating your masculinity.
Originally posted by Nephthys
W-WTF? Coercing someone into sex is ****ing rape dipstick. Do you need to look up the definition of coercion? Its 'use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance. ' Not chatting someone up.
The definition of "coerce" is "to persuade".,
So yes. Unless a woman wants to **** the very moment she lays eyes on you, you ARE in fact "coercing", or "persuading" her if you buy her a drink, chat her up and generally show her how great a guy you are.
Edit- Shane... 120 is not less than 1% of 1880. If it was, 120 would be able to go into it 100+ times... which it cannot.
No it isn't.
co·erce (k-ûrs)
tr.v. co·erced, co·erc·ing, co·erc·es
1. To force to act or think in a certain way by use of pressure, threats, or intimidation; compel.
2. To dominate, restrain, or control forcibly: coerced the strikers into compliance. See Synonyms at force.
3. To bring about by force or threat: efforts to coerce agreement.
co·er·cion
[koh-ur-shuhn] Show IPA
noun
1.
the act of coercing; use of force or intimidation to obtain compliance.
2.
force or the power to use force in gaining compliance, as by a government or police force.
Originally posted by NemeBro
You're pretty ****ing dumb bro.It's less than 1%, and coercion is a very vague term son.
I don't think you understand, which makes sense, but the lack of cooperation is all part of the "game" in such a relationship fatboy.
You need to calm down and stop hating your masculinity.
For a guy calling me dumb you sure are pants at maths. 1% would be 18.83 ya mook.
Yeah, if its established to be a game or if it is a relationship. Otherwise you're forcing yourself on someone without prior consent aka ****ing rape.
I am calm. The only way I'm not calm is in how worrying your attitude is.