Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
No wiki article is canon.
However it can easily contain information that is canon.
Wikis are not generally accepted as a source for research and such, because they are peer-edited, but for the most part they're just as reliable as a paper encyclopedia. Vandalism isn't as common as it's made out to be and it's generally corrected very quickly.
Originally posted by Peach1. Sure, but used as a source in any kind of research paper or debate? Nah.
However it can easily contain information that is canon.Wikis are not generally accepted as a source for research and such, because they are peer-edited, but for the most part they're just as reliable as a paper encyclopedia. Vandalism isn't as common as it's made out to be and it's generally corrected very quickly.
2. But it exists, making it not credible as a source.
Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
1. Sure, but used as a source in any kind of research paper or debate? Nah.2. But it exists, making it not credible as a source.
For a silly online debate over which character would beat another, it's good enough. For an actual real debate or a paper, then yes, you're correct.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteSir, you have not seen many of my posts then.
to chat, I'm not gonna post a link here, or leech membership, but it's where Voy, CC, and myself all plot our evil KMC posts. You'd be welcome there cause so far you have no blatantly obvious sociopathy.
And no, I generally associate myself with "cool people."
Originally posted by ScreamPasteA Dirty Sanchez is not techincally a mustache.
My mom has a moustache.Furthermore, how old are you? Cause I might be older than you.
My current mortal shell has existed for over 17 years, but my true, immortal, Godlike form is eternal. I have no beginning, and no end. I simply am.