Originally posted by NemeBro
Once again, ego cuddling. Playing off those that criticise you as simply committing "infantile whimpering" so your ego is not threatened. Deplorable.Why would I do that? I don't want to fit in his shoes, I have big feet, I prolly will not fit.
Depending on the type of "crazy," yes. If their mental instability is a threat to someone else, they should not be allowed to live.
It counts for his dad being a weak-willed moron.
I'm 17. His age has nothing to do with it.
You're a comedian. Only not funny.
Dude you are like Hitler. Crazy people are disabled, man. They still have the right to live.
His dad is a weak-willed moron for forgiving his son? That is so Hitler-esque dude. Forgiving is virtuous.
You sound like a total Neo-Nazi NemeBro.
Originally posted by Burning thoughtYeah. BT is smarter!
The only diffrence is Nemebro is clumsy and obvious in doing it, ime just matching his nonsense with some of my own, typically, ego "boosting" is unnecessery, especially on a forum.
Originally posted by LLLLLinkYou mean you're going to turn back into ScreamPaste? Yay! I like him better anyway.
Note to all: I'm getting my internet service shut off because I am poor as hell, meaning......I will not be able to debate much anymore. I might throw in a comment or two if I'm at the library, but that will be rare. Here's to hoping that I get it back soon. Effective tomorrow.
j/k
Edit: ^That is in reference to everyone thinking ScreamPaste is LLLink. He is not. [fact]
Originally posted by Burning thought
The only diffrence is Nemebro is clumsy and obvious in doing it,
ime just matching his nonsense with some of my own,
I know the style, but to be frank, you're doing it wrong.
typically, ego "boosting" is unnecessery, especially on a forum.
Originally posted by Burning thought
I dont, I just match people with mockeries of their own behaviour to show them how foolish they have been, which is why I pretty much mimicked his post and replaced words that reflect him.
So... you're being ridiculous on purpose? To make someone else look ridiculous?
I know the style, but to be frank, you're doing it wrong.
Originally posted by General KalieroKaliero, that isn't exactly fair. He isn't fluent in English, so sarcasm and wordplay don't come as naturally to him as they do to you.
I reiterate:So... you're being ridiculous on purpose? To make someone else look ridiculous?
I know the style, but to be frank, you're doing it wrong.
Give him a handicap.
Exactley, but he doesnt debate, he combines a few fallacies, mostly Appeal to Popularity/audiance and Bandwagan as well as his personal favourite ad hominem. Then when he is defeated he flees and leaves the read, claiming another fallacy before he leaves, probably an ad hominem again or a appeal to popularity.
Originally posted by General Kaliero
When used properly, that method paints the victim as a boorish fool, while giving you the air of smug, chiding superiority.The way you do it, you just look like you're bringing yourself to his level.
Exactley, thats the point, when a child is misheaving or whining, you need to bring yourself to the childs level and make itself realise how foolish its being.
(learnt this off of Nanny 911)