Originally posted by DigiMark007
So the point is to spite another member by quoting them (likely out of context) and calling them an idiot? Lovely use of the "new topic" button ( 🙄 ). There's probably some other irretrievably-lost purpose to this thread, but you don't seem willing to share.
i made this thread to see if people were genuinely against the backlash of the other thread, or if they rather formed their own group think tank in which people who are not religious are viewed as stupid. i wondered how such a rude and trollish thread could exist, and challenged the general concensus of "you (athiests) deserve to be made fun of as well/whats good for the goose...etc".
this thread is a test of true ideals vs. deliberate bias.
and no, nothing was quoted out of context. the argument is identical, yet flipped.
not a single slight of insult or point added or subtracted. simply the idiotic yin to the other thread's yang.
while it is not my own opinion that religion = stupidity, or atheism = stupidity, these opinions are rampant. if one must be tolerated and allowed to exist unclosed, so must this. if not then what exists here is factually a sycophantic group think tank.
so you can either breath in the foulness and smile, correct the entire problem by not allowing insulting/belittling topics from anyone or rather any side, or you can take the road of the hypocrite an only damn those insults which affect you.
so yes. im calling the integrity of this little forum into question. if you dont like it...well then do what you feel you must. ill be watching with interest.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
and when have I ever trashed you for being a butt pirate?also, I have never tried to push my beliefs on others...get it?
Originally posted by mahamMan my head still hurts 😖
Now the discussion has actually started.Thanks I already knew that.
I've said it before n I'll say it again:Every1 worships the same God.God is 1.That's what every religion said.The problem came when they started associatin God's powers with others n that is shirk,the unforgivable sin.The concept of trilogy is shirk.Yes,they do say that Jesus is Himself a God in human form(in some factions),but that also comes under the definition of shirk.The ACTUAl 1 God(who they call the father)hasn't been shown in any form (as Jesus has statues n pictures etc.)
N u'll decide that? Denial is another form of ignorance.
N that's exactly wat's bin happenin in this thead lately till now that is.
Errr....No thanks.I'd rather study physics that do that.Btw,how can u feel 3 things on the same line? 🙄
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
and when have I ever trashed you for being a butt pirate?also, I have never tried to push my beliefs on others...get it?
I wasn't referring to you specifically, I was just answering your question.
I am not attacking you, I am attacking the Bible and the beleif system around it.
I was just basically saying, if the Bible labels me unclean, sinful, and deserving of eternal hell, than why do I not have the right to bash the Bible back ?
Originally posted by Goddess Kali
I wasn't referring to you specifically, I was just answering your question.I am not attacking you, I am attacking the Bible and the beleif system around it.
I was just basically saying, if the Bible labels me unclean, sinful, and deserving of eternal hell, than why do I not have the right to bash the Bible back ?
because 2 wrongs make a right (pun certainly intended)?
Originally posted by inimalist
because 2 wrongs make a right (pun certainly intended)?
Does a book have feelings ? No
So I wouldn't be harming a book if I disrespect a book.
I as a human being, have a life and feelings. So if a book trashes me, and people are influenced by it, then yes, I have a right to trash the book for its idealogy.
Originally posted by Goddess Kali
Does a book have feelings ? NoSo I wouldn't be harming a book if I disrespect a book.
I as a human being, have a life and feelings. So if a book trashes me, and people are influenced by it, then yes, I have a right to trash the book for its idealogy.
you have freedom of speech, you can trash whatever you want
it seems funny that you make a moral argument against trashing something and then profess your absolute right to trash something...
but hey, I have no policy against trashing, just enjoy some good moral paradoxes 🙂