Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Damn.. DAMN... I'd like to see someone refute that argument.. However he is simply stating the obvious, that Sidious is above everybody else, and the argument begins for #2, #3, etc. Furthermore, he's asserting that because the ancient sith used talismans and amulets, they ALL depended on them. This is fallacious, especially when TOTJ states that the talismans and amulets were used to pass down stories throughout the ages, as multipurpose tools.. But yea, this guy knows his shit.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Not sure about that. His argument about Palpatine is infallible. I'd love for someone to refute it.
LMAO!! 😆 😆
Originally posted by nmensfinest
The guy's clearly a good writer, however how can you honestly accurately evaluate his debating ability from one opening post without seeing the quality of his replies to contesting posts? From what I've seen on this forum, Advent, Illustrious and IKC have demonstrated far greater debating ability.
You're welcome to that opinion. And while Advent, Illustrious, IKC, and Janus are gifted thinkers and debaters, in order to fully understand Publius's skills, you'd have to visit SD.net. This thread is more or less about his writing ability. But as far as his debating skills are concerned, in a single post, he just dismantled the entire "Ancient Sith pwn all!" theory in a succinct way that took months of arguments here to prove. Furthermore, Publius can get his point across without ever resorting to personal attacks, jabs, or insults, which is something that no one here -- myself included -- can claim. Lastly, the man has a source for everything, so rarely does he have to rely on fallible logical deduction.
I wouldn't exactly put IKC up there with You, Advent and Janus. From what Ive been reading over at EoD, he's too busy praising Kun to even think straight. Other than that, I completely agree, Gids.
I used to be a good debator, though Ive gotten dull from being gone so long, and it appears KMCs SW Vs forum isn't really used all that much.
Very unlikely Faunus. I'm not bragging about my debating skills and my huge package, but you need to back up a statement like that. I have read his arguments and while I consider him a very good debater, he's only as good as his favorite character. I haven't seen him bring his A game to any character other than Kun, and I would say Escape, Advent, and sometimes even LS are better even on their worst days.
Originally posted by FaunusIf you consider "Kun PWNS!" or "Kun will wipe the floor with him" 'arguments' then you'd be correct. I especially loved how he said those two quotes in a LOTF Luke vs Exar Kun thread over at EoD. Just proves he's a fanboy. 😂
Please. IKC had some of the best arguments this place had ever seen, and he's likely twice the debater of any regular left here.
That and I really don't take your words for anything since you yourself were once an 'Ancient Sith PWNS all' fanboy here before Ush made you all leave.
Well he's a Kun fanboy, that is true. However, he has offered some of the best arguments I've ever seen. BUT, that was before most of us knew what we were talking about. With that said, he's also offered some of the most ridiculous arguments when it comes to Kun vs. Sidious or Kun vs. Luke, so it goes both ways.
Originally posted by FaunusYeah, until he resorted to just saying 'Kun PWNS all' and whatever crap he came up with. And if those were the best you've seen here, then you've obviously haven't seen much. That and I don't really consider you a reliable source on anything here either.
His pro-Kun arguments, which is where he made his mark, were some of the best I've seen here, ever. I don't remember seeing his stances on other characters, but those arguments were fantastic.
Originally posted by Spartan ll If you consider "Kun PWNS!" or "Kun will wipe the floor with him" 'arguments' then you'd be correct. I especially loved how he said those two quotes in a LOTF Luke vs Exar Kun thread over at EoD. Just proves he's a fanboy. 😂As opposed to you - what good arguments have you made lately, if ever? And really, do you haunt EoD just to see what the old timers are up to? Or are you just making sh*t up, cuz IKC hasn't so much as mentioned Kun in months.
Originally posted by Spartan llIf by "haven't seen much" you mean I was here over a month before the noob flood, yeah. And for the record, I couldn't give two sh*ts what you consider me to be, considering I know the guy a hell of a lot better than you and - unlike you - I don't have some irrational hate of people who can debate.
Yeah, until he resorted to just saying 'Kun PWNS all' and whatever crap he came up with. And if those were the best you've seen here, then you've obviously haven't seen much. That and I don't really consider you a reliable source on anything here either.
Well he's a Kun fanboy, that is true. However, he has offered some of the best arguments I've ever seen. BUT, that was before most of us knew what we were talking about. With that said, he's also offered some of the most ridiculous arguments when it comes to Kun vs. Sidious or Kun vs. Luke, so it goes both ways.With the exception of Luke, for whom there was never anyone who could make a good case for, almost all of his arguments were spotless.
Originally posted by FaunusSo you're trying to make this about me to evade show us IKCs 'incredible' arguments? Pathetic. Don't go trying to make this about if you don't have an argument. Nope, I just find you all to be entertaining, and that's about it. I'm not making anything up, my evasive friend. Even Sexy and I'm sure a few others, remember when IKC would say 'Kun wipes the floor with him' in any Luke VS Exar or Sidious VS Exar thread.
As opposed to you - what good arguments have you made lately, if ever? And really, do you haunt EoD just to see what the old timers are up to? Or are you just making sh*t up, cuz IKC hasn't so much as mentioned Kun in months.