Versus Forum Rules ?

Started by Artemis186011 pages
Originally posted by willRules
I'm reminded of Batman begins when Gordan says "But you're just one man" and Batman replies with "Now we're two."

And Gordan has this look on his face of "GAH!!!!!! WTFOMFGBBQ?!?!?!"

okay, just kidding.

on-topic-ness now...

I've said before I don't like the new rules, but I spose I'll keep an open mind, as the mods aren't idiots. I don't know Ill, but I know pr.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How many is?

Main Entry: ar·my
Pronunciation: 'är-mE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural armies
Etymology: Middle English armee, from Anglo-French, from Medieval Latin armata -- more at ARMADA
1 a : a large organized body of armed personnel trained for war especially on land b : a unit capable of independent action and consisting usually of a headquarters, two or more corps, and auxiliary troops c often capitalized : the complete military organization of a nation for land warfare
2 : a great multitude <an army of birds>
3 : a body of persons organized to advance a cause
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=army

4 works for army... but...

Main Entry: 1le·gion
Pronunciation: 'lE-j&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin legion-, legio, from legere to gather -- more at LEGEND
1 : the principal unit of the Roman army comprising 3000 to 6000 foot soldiers with cavalry
2 : a large military force; especially : ARMY 1a
3 : a very large number : MULTITUDE
4 : a national association of ex-servicemen
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/legion

You're short by about 2996 to 5996 men to be a legion.

Originally posted by Artemis1860
And Gordan has this look on his face of "GAH!!!!!! WTFOMFGBBQ?!?!?!"

okay, just kidding.

Exactly 😉

Originally posted by Creshosk
Main Entry: ar·my
Pronunciation: 'är-mE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural armies
Etymology: Middle English armee, from Anglo-French, from Medieval Latin armata -- more at ARMADA
1 a : a large organized body of armed personnel trained for war especially on land b : a unit capable of independent action and consisting usually of a headquarters, two or more corps, and auxiliary troops c often capitalized : the complete military organization of a nation for land warfare
2 : a great multitude <an army of birds>
3 : a body of persons organized to advance a cause
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=army

4 works for army... but...

Main Entry: 1le·gion
Pronunciation: 'lE-j&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin legion-, legio, from legere to gather -- more at LEGEND
1 : the principal unit of the Roman army comprising 3000 to 6000 foot soldiers with cavalry
2 : a large military force; especially : ARMY 1a
3 : a very large number : MULTITUDE
4 : a national association of ex-servicemen
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/legion

You're short by about 2996 to 5996 men to be a legion.

doh

Originally posted by Creshosk
You're short by about 2996 to 5996 men to be a legion.

Meh, give Rew and Juntai five mins and just see what happens..........

...........

Probably nothing.......... 😮

Re: Versus Forum Rules ?

No it doesn't.

Originally posted by Rewmac
I'm with Juntai on this one...

Juntai well formulated as usual. Great posts you wrote there my deepest respect. I can only speak on my own behalf, but you in a very good way managed to put words on my feelings I have about the current situation in the vs Forum. I couldn't have done it so smoothly myself.

👆

I think there should be no more cross genre threads, but the ones open right now should stay open.

Originally posted by Creshosk
4 people is an army? Or a legion?
😕

I actually counted 17. Or is that poll at the top of the screen a figament of my imagination?

Imagination. 😬

I am a bit tired of all the DBZ and harry potter vs treads in the Versus Forums

Originally posted by Martian_mind
Imagination. 😬

Must be right along there with our worthless opinions.

Originally posted by The Problem
Must be right along there with our worthless opinions.

Yep.Wouldn't be a problem if it was admittedly a mistake and they made a new forum for frr-for-alls.

Rather then f*ck up ours...

Originally posted by Martian_mind
Yep.Wouldn't be a problem if it was admittedly a mistake and they made a new forum for frr-for-alls.

Rather then f*ck up ours...

I am sorta wondering why they cant admit their plan didn't work out and create a free for all sub forum?

As has been said,Ego.

Perhaps because they dont' think it didn't work.

Maybe they're waiting to see if the kinks work themselves out or if there's a way to work them out.

It's possible it could happen. I say at this point, wait and see. Things will either get better, or rules will change again. Let the mods handle it, it's not our job to tell them what to do. Feedback is one thing, but bashing their decisions is another.

Eh,when the general consensus is is that it was a bad decision,but it still isn't changed......eh.

My problem is that Jun's idea(far better Imo) isn't being listened too.

Give the mods time, Martian, seriously.

Originally posted by Artemis1860
Perhaps because they dont' think it didn't work.

Maybe they're waiting to see if the kinks work themselves out or if there's a way to work them out.

It's possible it could happen. I say at this point, wait and see. Things will either get better, or rules will change again. Let the mods handle it, it's not our job to tell them what to do. Feedback is one thing, but bashing their decisions is another.

Our feedback has obviously meant little to the new mods. When 95% of the posters whom made these forums what they were(the best vs forum on the net) want the previous rules, then the rules need to be changed. Its obvious those who do not want the new rules far outweigh those who want them so why not change them?

Oh,i can wait.

But still,Jun WTF pwns that idea.If voting for a new mod occured he'd get my vote.(and panties thrown on stage)