ragesRemorse
Senior Member
Originally posted by SnakeEyes
The tone of the film itself (referring to the Tom Jane Punisher) wasn't all that dark. Aspects of it definitely were, but it didn't seem like the movie took itself that seriously and if there's one comic character that should be downright serious, it's the Punisher. Not saying there can't be any humor, but they didn't capture the feel of the Punisher in my opinion. Frank seems more pissed off in this one from what I saw in the trailer. Not to mention his appearance is older/resembles more of the MAX Punisher, which is good.I agree with the latter aspect of your post. I hope they add more depth in this new Punisher as well. I don't want him to just be a gun-toting killer.
yeah, i dont know, i see it completely different. The massacre on his family and the fight scene against the big Russian were visceral and added much intensity to the movie. I think Travolta's character and overall presence held the movie down very much and not just because he cannot act..,well, yeah just because he cannot act.
I definitely do not see how people say Janes punisher was a weak portrayal of the character. There may not have been as much of a GRADUAL decline into insanity as there should have been, but it was very apparent that this was a man with issue's. This was made known mostly through acting rather than writing. I guess i might be able to see people thinking the punisher wasn't justified because he didn't murder more people than Rambo. I suppose they could have worked in an interrogation scene that highlighted his ruthlessness, but i appreciated watching the punisher use his mind to force his enemies into punishing themselves. Most of the action scenes in the movie were lifted directly from the comics and other than a rushed production and a shitty Travolta, i think it could have been one of the best comic adaptations. If you watch watch the directors cut with the animated opening sequence, the movie has so much more depth.