leonheartmm
Senior Member
Originally posted by FeceMan
Statement: FeceMan has, on multiple occasions, explained certain things to certain posters, such as the following:--The existence of hell and an omnibenevolent God.
--The justice behind ignoring works with salvation.
--The existence of "bad things" and an omnibenevolent God.
--The reason why Christians do not follow the Mosaic Law despite it being in the Bible.
Statement: Despite FeceMan's efforts, certain posters cannot seem to comprehend how these things work within the Christian faith.
Reiteration: What is the point of discussion if any of the responses FeceMan and others give are ignored and the same erroneous beliefs about Christianity are perpetuated?
Addendum: Although this is in reference to Judeo-Christian discussions, it too can be applied to other faiths and beliefs. However, Judeo-Christian discussions are the most prominent aspect of the Religion Forum at KMC.
most posters who are not convinced by your explanations find them......well.... "lacking". is it really so hard to conceptualise that in this instance it might be your individual explanation that has the problem and not the wrest of the posters who oppose it? 😕
i think many a time those arguments are going against some other tradition/law in christianity or contradicting past/present events or contradicting the characteristics of the mystical powers in christandom.
also, those arguments might fail to give adequate explanation of the phenomenon/discussion, in question, or they might have unexplained HOLES. they also can be on among many interpretations of their reference points and the other posters might believe that their is no reason to choose your explanations over others based on the source.
finally, in the eyes of the posters, those explanations might not solve the problems/answer the querries, in THEIR eyes/expirience, which you were trying to address.
{btw, maybe its just me but you sound sad. any particular reason? 😕 }