Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hey bud? The whole "Statement" "Addendum" "Reiteration" crap, combined with referring to yourself in the third person, comes off as sounding pretentious as hell. If you want to engage people in meaningful discussion, maybe try to meet them eye-to-eye and treat them with respect, rather than acting like you yourself are some disembodied entity who is gracing us with your opinions.
I second that verbatim.
Yeah, what chit said. I'm all for dorkdom in all it's forms (I'm wearing a dino comics shirt right now with the speech bubble "Press my nipple for Zeppelin Initiation" velcroed onto it) but there's a line between amusing homage and pretentious preaching. To me, it feels like that line has been crossed...and as long as he keeps the facade up, we have no reason to believe otherwise.
Originally posted by DigiMark007Ah come on, cut the guy some slack. we are all geeks here.
Yeah, what chit said. I'm all for dorkdom in all it's forms (I'm wearing a dino comics shirt right now with the speech bubble "Press my nipple for Zeppelin Initiation" velcroed onto it) but there's a line between amusing homage and pretentious preaching. To me, it feels like that line has been crossed...and as long as he keeps the facade up, we have no reason to believe otherwise.
Statement: Considering the topic of the thread Bardock feels following should not be disregarded by FeceMan
Originally posted by Bardock42
Statement: Bardock has asked FeceMan to explain those certain things to him on numerous occasions. He has not ignored earlier explanations and would very much like to know FeceMan's stands on those.Could FeceMan explain it to him in Private or Public?
Also, FeceMan should keep in mind that certain other posters calling themselves by the same name of faith do not agree with his explanations oftentimes. They would have to explain those issues by themselves. If anything to become more agreeable....like FeceMan is.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hey bud? The whole "Statement" "Addendum" "Reiteration" crap, combined with referring to yourself in the third person, comes off as sounding pretentious as hell. If you want to engage people in meaningful discussion, maybe try to meet them eye-to-eye and treat them with respect, rather than acting like you yourself are some disembodied entity who is gracing us with your opinions.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE[QUOTE=9312595]Originally posted by FeceMan
Admission: HK-47 is FeceMan's favorite character in the game.
HK47 is also a sock whose posting style you have been emulating recently. Coincidence?
[/QUOTE]
Originally posted by Creshosk
Declaration: Wrong fandom, meatbag.(Meatbag is just something that HK-47 sometimes calls organic beings)
🙄 Just to clarify I am fully aware of who HK-47 is, that he is who Feceman sounds like:
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=419912&pagenumber=23
Look for the post of me telling Debbiejo it was HK-47. But since everyone was mimicking him it was getting more Borg like then HK-47 like (since he was so individualistic and was kind of upset when he learnt about the inferior copies - the HK-50 series.)
Declaration: FeceMan does not care one whit what other posters think of his manner of speech.Imperative: Return to the topic at hand.
Out of interest - are you hoping someone in this thread will go "because I am just trying to be difficult, what you say is true but I don't care" - I mean really, what are you looking for here?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Ah come on, cut the guy some slack. we are all geeks here.
Ok, I'll give you that but what if EVERYONE ON THE FORUM POSTED LIKE FECEMAN...
It's only one thus far (and apparently it is rubbing off on something people) but it is already tiring reading someone speaking in third person like the Macho Man all the damn time.
Originally posted by chithappens
Ok, I'll give you that but what if EVERYONE ON THE FORUM POSTED LIKE FECEMAN...It's only one thus far (and apparently it is rubbing off on something people) but it is already tiring reading someone speaking in third person like the Macho Man all the damn time.
Hence my "Borg like, isn't it" statement.
Anyway I wouldn't like it, since it would detract from the character since far to few posters are as well written or have the same cynical charm as HK.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE[/B][/QUOTE]
[B]HK47 is also a sock whose posting style you have been emulating recently. Coincidence?
Interesting, but unfounded. HK47 is a possible sock of some people, but feceman is clean as far as I can tell. And aside from a warning from Ush a few months ago about bashing, his record's clean. It's likely just a coincidence.
Thanks for the investigative reporting though.
Feceman, for all its worth, I actually like some of your intepretations of the Bible.
However, many quotes in the Bible itself contradict your intepretations, and those other Christians on this forum who oppose your intepretations had reasonable scriptural reference explaining why.
And even still, some of your intepretations leave even more questions unanswered and unjustified.
Re: Query: What is the point of discussion if any responses are ignored?
Originally posted by FeceMan
Statement: FeceMan has, on multiple occasions, explained certain things to certain posters, such as the following:--The existence of hell and an omnibenevolent God.
--The justice behind ignoring works with salvation.
--The existence of "bad things" and an omnibenevolent God.
--The reason why Christians do not follow the Mosaic Law despite it being in the Bible.Statement: Despite FeceMan's efforts, certain posters cannot seem to comprehend how these things work within the Christian faith.
Reiteration: What is the point of discussion if any of the responses FeceMan and others give are ignored and the same erroneous beliefs about Christianity are perpetuated?
Addendum: Although this is in reference to Judeo-Christian discussions, it too can be applied to other faiths and beliefs. However, Judeo-Christian discussions are the most prominent aspect of the Religion Forum at KMC.
Why did you steal that annoying robot gimmick from that other member who's name I can't remember?
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Interesting, but unfounded. HK47 is a possible sock of some people, but feceman is clean as far as I can tell. And aside from a warning from Ush a few months ago about bashing, his record's clean. It's likely just a coincidence.Thanks for the investigative reporting though.
Feceman is clean, because he trolls under his sock accounts, one of them being HK47.