What is the true purpose of a career or other institutions?

Started by Czarina_Czarina7 pages

here's the second picture, the one that illustrates dominion...or several minds influencing each other, let's say the blue is you or I, and the rest of the circles belongs to others, maybe they have permission, maybe they don't.

Originally posted by Robtard
I only entertain you, because you sent me a picture of your ass and it's hole.

😂 When was this?

sorry...i tried to put these back to back, but...you get the picture...dominion or non-dominion...the green is you or I, and the blue is OTHER's thoughts of whatever they please or displease.

Wow, different colours.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
here's the second picture, the one that illustrates dominion

Disclaimer: Robtard is not a submissive.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
😂 When was this?

Later on today, after you take it and pm it. duh.

Originally posted by Robtard

Disclaimer: Robtard is not a submissive.


LMAO.
Originally posted by Robtard
Later on today, after you take it and pm it. duh.

Erm...you like to look at anal holes?....😬

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
LMAO.

Erm...you like to look at anal holes?....😬

Well, I like women's butts; the "holes" come along with the package. Unless there's something I am unaware about?

Originally posted by Robtard
Well, I like women's butts; the "holes" come along with the package. Unless there's something I am unaware about?

I like men's butts.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
That's the grossest SHIT ever...but funny. 😄
yummy.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
sorry...i tried to put these back to back, but...you get the picture...dominion or non-dominion...the green is you or I, and the blue is OTHER's thoughts of whatever they please or displease.

Why does the "others" circle have so many action lines around it? Is it a meteor?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
yummy.

You eat shit for breakfast?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
sorry...i tried to put these back to back, but...you get the picture...dominion or non-dominion...the green is you or I, and the blue is OTHER's thoughts of whatever they please or displease.

I took the liberty of making a more realistic portrait, no worries, this one is free of charge; you don't even hve to thank me.

It's so funny about thought. No matter I think I come from a star (one like the sun or not: Aryans think this way, and Aryans can be E. Indians, blacks, whites, Asians, as the swaztika has been used in buddism throughout asia, so no biggie if someone is mystic and thinks they are from the sun or another star system, who cares), or if I came from a race or if I came from the spirit of the moon; what I think, as long as I don't touch you, your income (which is a form a slavery), your job (which would be a form of slavery), or your property (car, house, bank)...what I think shouldn't matter to YOU, and likewise, unless you are being annoying, then you get ignored. Labels are like this, if someone "annoints" you with one, esp. if it's negative, you now have to PROVE yourself against that label (such as crazy or dumb or weirdo or bozo or whatever, ugly, pretty any ABSTRACT label), it's like a cloud between you and your mind, and you can't reach your mind without the interference of that label. (i'll show another illustration).

it's so IRONIC, let's say I think I'm (x) and let's say x=esteemed adjectives, someone else catches a whif of my thoughts and they don't like it, it's stinky to them. They could ignore it, or ignore me, or challenge my thought/esteem.

and about race, it's ironic that the dominion of the mind was the issue, how i thought of myself, by the same race that seems to prepetuate the history of slavery, when in fact, trying to possess my thoughts is a form of slavery, IRONIC.

Dominion, the mind, liberty, who has that right? And who has the right to teach someone else their version of morality. I'm a christian, I do not like the Muslim faith, and I have commented on it. At work, when muslim ladies pray in the lady's room, guess what I do if I happen to walk in? I don't shit bricks as some co-workers would, I simply leave and go to the next floor up or down. I respect the individual if they do not play games of controling who I think I am (which means having control over what I like to do, as they can now label that as being "white" or "black" or "out of place", and I don't want their promission for it, as I am not out to offer them promission to think or be who they want to be), but I may not like the culture, but if they individual respects me (my liberty), then I offer them the upmost hospitality, to the point of being over-gracious, even if I dislike or disapprove of their culture. They earned my respect by not trying to possess or control what I think of myself and for that, I can be very gracious and overty kind and warm. To try to possess it, well, I'm rigid, quiet, distant, turning the other cheek or an about-face. REspect, dominion, slavery, the mind. And remember, I was the one telling folks thath in Greek slavery, they never could use a slave if they were able to reason, once a person could reason, they were part of the working class that could now pay tax or own property (unless you were female) and race was not an issue with WHO was made slave. So again, liberty starts with the mind, if you want to a slave, that's your right, but do not try to put an unwilling person, just b/c they have some mixture of black or whatever, don't try to put them into your system of thought, as that can be problematic.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
It's so funny about thought. Weather I think I come from a star (one like the sun or not), or if I came from a race or if I came from the spirit of the moon; what I think, as long as I don't touch you, your income (which is a form a slavery), your job (which would be a form of slavery), or your property (car, house, bank)...what I think shouldn't matter to YOU, and likewise, unless you are being annoying, then you get ignored. Labels are like this, if someone "annoints" you with one, esp. if it's negative, you now have to PROVE yourself against that label (such as crazy or dumb or weirdo or bozo or whatever, ugly, pretty any ABSTRACT label), it's like a cloud between you and your mind, and you can't reach your mind without the interference of that label. (i'll show another illustration).

it's so IRONIC, let's say I think I'm (x) and let's say x=esteemed adjectives, someone else catches a whif of my thoughts and they don't like it, it's stinky to them. They could ignore it, or ignore me, or challenge my thought/esteem.

and about race, it's ironic that the dominion of the mind was the issue, how i thought of myself, by the same race that seems to prepetuate the history of slavery, when in fact, trying to possess my thoughts is a form of slavery, IRONIC.

Dominion, the mind, liberty, who has that right? And who has the right to teach someone else their version of morality. I'm a christian, I do not like the Muslim faith, and I have commented on it. At work, when muslim ladies pray in the lady's room, guess what I do if I happen to walk in? I don't shit bricks as some co-workers would, I simply leave and go to the next floor up or down. I respect the individual if they do not play games of controling who I think I am (which means having control over what I like to do, as they can now label that as being "white" or "black" or "out of place", and I don't want their promission for it, as I am not out to offer them promission to think or be who they want to be), but I may not like the culture, but if they individual respects me (my liberty), then I offer them the upmost hospitality, to the point of being over-gracious, even if I dislike or disapprove of their culture.

You were fired from your job, it happens, let it go; move on.

unless there is a responsibility to a person, such as a boss or parent or law officer/judge, then that other person's thought or perspective is given careful weight and gauranteed action in the positive. and again, they too are under the law, so my ex-boss telling me that i was confused and needed to be dominated, that was against my civil rights, my liberty.

however, if there is no responsibility for that other person, what they think is their business. if they think they are high or low, it's up to them to figure their own measure of esteem and leave mine alone. besides, they don't know how many years or suffering it took to develop the ability to earn an esteem.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
It's so funny about thought. No matter I think I come from a star (one like the sun or not: Aryans think this way, and Aryans can be E. Indians, blacks, whites, Asians, as the swaztika has been used in buddism throughout asia, so no biggie if someone is mystic and thinks they are from the sun or another star system, who cares), or if I came from a race or if I came from the spirit of the moon; what I think, as long as I don't touch you, your income (which is a form a slavery), your job (which would be a form of slavery), or your property (car, house, bank)...what I think shouldn't matter to YOU, and likewise, unless you are being annoying, then you get ignored. Labels are like this, if someone "annoints" you with one, esp. if it's negative, you now have to PROVE yourself against that label (such as crazy or dumb or weirdo or bozo or whatever, ugly, pretty any ABSTRACT label), it's like a cloud between you and your mind, and you can't reach your mind without the interference of that label. (i'll show another illustration).

it's so IRONIC, let's say I think I'm (x) and let's say x=esteemed adjectives, someone else catches a whif of my thoughts and they don't like it, it's stinky to them. They could ignore it, or ignore me, or challenge my thought/esteem.

and about race, it's ironic that the dominion of the mind was the issue, how i thought of myself, by the same race that seems to prepetuate the history of slavery, when in fact, trying to possess my thoughts is a form of slavery, IRONIC.

Dominion, the mind, liberty, who has that right? And who has the right to teach someone else their version of morality. I'm a christian, I do not like the Muslim faith, and I have commented on it. At work, when muslim ladies pray in the lady's room, guess what I do if I happen to walk in? I don't shit bricks as some co-workers would, I simply leave and go to the next floor up or down. I respect the individual if they do not play games of controling who I think I am (which means having control over what I like to do, as they can now label that as being "white" or "black" or "out of place", and I don't want their promission for it, as I am not out to offer them promission to think or be who they want to be), but I may not like the culture, but if they individual respects me (my liberty), then I offer them the upmost hospitality, to the point of being over-gracious, even if I dislike or disapprove of their culture. They earned my respect by not trying to possess or control what I think of myself and for that, I can be very gracious and overty kind and warm. To try to possess it, well, I'm rigid, quiet, distant, turning the other cheek or an about-face. REspect, dominion, slavery, the mind. And remember, I was the one telling folks thath in Greek slavery, they never could use a slave if they were able to reason, once a person could reason, they were part of the working class that could now pay tax or own property (unless you were female) and race was not an issue with WHO was made slave. So again, liberty starts with the mind, if you want to a slave, that's your right, but do not try to put an unwilling person, just b/c they have some mixture of black or whatever, don't try to put them into your system of thought, as that can be problematic.

Hang on a minute, you think you come from a star? Jesus, no wander you got fired. I bet you stink of piss and walk to the shops in slippers and pyjamas.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
unless there is a responsibility to a person, such as a boss or parent or law officer/judge, then that other person's thought or perspective is given careful weight and gauranteed action in the positive. and again, they too are under the law, so my ex-boss telling me that i was confused and needed to be dominated, that was against my civil rights, my liberty.

however, if there is no responsibility for that other person, what they think is their business. if they think they are high or low, it's up to them to figure their own measure of esteem and leave mine alone. besides, they don't know how many years or suffering it took to develop the ability to earn an esteem.

Correct, it's also called "sexual harassment", get a lawyer; sue for compensation. What you don't do, is rant irrelevant nonsense on a debate board like it's your own personal diary.

edit:
One word of advice, (if the boss/company doesn't settle out of court) do not mention anything you've said about "spirituality", "soul-switching", "coming from a star" etc. etc. etc. to the judge and/or jury. In fact, I advise you to not take the stand and just get a really good lawyer.

She'd just end up standing up in court going on about empaths and 'blacks'. It would be fantastic to watch, if it happens Czarina, please god tell us all about it.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
She'd just end up standing up in court going on about empaths and 'blacks'. It would be fantastic to watch, if it happens Czarina, please god tell us all about it.

LOL, I edited in the same sentiments as you responded... agreed, it would be a sight to see.

Have you ever seen "And Justice For ALL", where Al Pacino plays a lawyer who has a breakdown in the courtroom?