GEB invades marvel the END

Started by quanchi1124 pages

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
He's Infinite And Eternal. Only God is both.
hes not supreme. dc presence isnt supreme. what a shame.

Originally posted by quanchi112
so the there is no supreme being. wow. wonder what nver thinks of this proof.

No i never said there was no supreme being, from everything we have read yhwh/the Presence is supreme only God can be Infinite and Eternal and The Creator. That is much more then Thanos w/thotu ever said, he never said "I am Eternal and Infinite" to do so would mean he would have to know everything that would happen in Marvel the End which he didn't, and he was separated from the Heart and it was seemingly destroyed after he remade the MU, something that would never happened if he was truly Eternal/God.

Originally posted by kevdude
No i never said there was no supreme being, from everything we have read yhwh/the Presence is supreme only God can be Infinite and Eternal and The Creator. That is much more then Thanos w/thotu ever said, he never said "I am Eternal and Infinite" to do so would mean he would have to know everything that would happen in Marvel the End which he didn't, and he was separated from the Heart and it was seemingly destroyed after he remade the MU, something that would never happened if he was truly Eternal/God.
sorry doesnt pass go here. presence cant defeat the geb which means he aint supreme. he sint all powerful but has a direct and equal counterpart. thanos with the heart had no equal hence he was supreme.

tell me a comic book being on panel that could defeat thanos with the heart cuz if u dont i win.

i wanna hear who u think in marvel could defeat thanos with the heart.

Originally posted by quanchi112
sorry doesnt pass go here. presence cant defeat the geb which means he aint supreme. he sint all powerful but has a direct and equal counterpart. thanos with the heart had no equal hence he was supreme.

tell me a comic book being on panel that could defeat thanos with the heart cuz if u dont i win.

i wanna hear who u think in marvel could defeat thanos with the heart.

Ok....Thanos couldn't defeat the Inifinity Being....he could only stalemate him. Thanos couldn't defeat God...the same God that the Fantastic Four saw in Marvel's Heaven. These are on panel beings. So, if you keep persisting that the Presence isn't Supreme because he can't defeat the GEB...then, what do you call the former Supreme Being of Marvel...the Infinity Being? Oops....Marvel has had more than one Supreme Being on Panel. According to your logic...there can't be more than one Supreme Being?

However, I know you won't accept this...and you'll come up with some lame excuse to keep this argument going.

Originally posted by KMC_Drifter
Ok....Thanos couldn't defeat the Inifinity Being....he could only stalemate him. Thanos couldn't defeat God...the same God that the Fantastic Four saw in Marvel's Heaven. These are on panel beings. So, if you keep persisting that the Presence isn't Supreme because he can't defeat the GEB...then, what do you call the former Supreme Being of Marvel...the Infinity Being? Oops....Marvel has had more than one Supreme Being on Panel. According to your logic...there can't be more than one Supreme Being?

However, I know you won't accept this...and you'll come up with some lame excuse to keep this argument going.

its not lame its true. thanos was more than the infinity being when he got the heart. sorry but if u read the story ud realize his power far surpassed what he had when he had the ig. thanos with the heart ws supreme,proved it n panel, and eternity dint argue with him becuz he knew it was tue.

the lt was nothing to thanos with the heart who had the most impressive on panel feats out of anyone basically in a comic.

geb loses.

Originally posted by quanchi112
its not lame its true. thanos was more than the infinity being when he got the heart. sorry but if u read the story ud realize his power far surpassed what he had when he had the ig. thanos with the heart ws supreme,proved it n panel, and eternity dint argue with him becuz he knew it was tue.

the lt was nothing to thanos with the heart who had the most impressive on panel feats out of anyone basically in a comic.

geb loses.

So Could thanos beat The Kirby Avatar?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
So Could thanos beat The Kirby Avatar?
anything on panel and proven to be less than supreme thanos defeats here.

😛

Originally posted by quanchi112
anything on panel and proven to be less than supreme thanos defeats here.

😛

The Kirby Avatar was God. Supreme and undefeatable.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
The Kirby Avatar was God. Supreme and undefeatable.
didnt hear of this kirby avatar. what issue was he in? and what feats does he have? did he defeat all uber beings at once with ease or just claim to be supreme.

Originally posted by quanchi112
didnt hear of this kirby avatar. what issue was he in? and what feats does he have? did he defeat all uber beings at once with ease or just claim to be supreme.

Supreme beings do not need feats. They do not need to defeat anyone. They are supreme. Unchallengeable.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Supreme beings do not need feats. They do not need to defeat anyone. They are supreme. Unchallengeable.
wrong by ur own logic. thanos was supreme and actually proved it and u still acted like he wasnt. sorry kid but until kirbys avatar proves it i dont buy it.

pawned with ur own logic.

Originally posted by Galan007
It's "logically inconsistent" for a character to breath unaided in the vacuum of space, but no one questions that.

No it's not. It's physically impossible, but not logically inconsistent - i.e. it doesn't contradict itself.

It's "logically inconsistent" for a shot of gamma radiation to turn a normal human being into a huge green dude that gets really really strong as he gets angrier, but no one questions that.

See above.

As a matter of fact,

Trying to find logic in every event you come across in comics, is "logically inconsistent". 😬

Learn the difference between physical impossibilities and logical impossibilities.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
[B]No it's not. It's physically impossible, but not logically inconsistent - i.e. it doesn't contradict itself.

It is impossible to breathe in vacuum, because there are no matter to inhale, you cannot suck up vacuum.

Learn the difference between physical impossibilities and logical impossibilities.

No, you're wrong. Physics are based on logic, thus being completely logical.

Learn the difference between fiction and reality.

Something that contradicts physics does not necessarily contradict logic. If the laws of physics were different, then the laws of logic would still be the same.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Something that contradicts physics does not necessarily contradict logic. If the laws of physics were different, then the laws of logic would still be the same.

What the hell are you talking about?
It's logical that a mass would be drawn to another, it's logical that if you affect a mass with a force it would move.
Physics are based on logic, if they were written differentely they would have to be read differentely.
Physics are basicly illustrated logic (or partly, physics are just one of many)

If you eant to make a case, give a concrete example of something that is by the laws of physic impossible, but not impossible following logic.

No, that's determined by physics. Logic is something that can be determined without any outside observations, because a logical contradiction would be inherently nonsensical. Like a square circle, or a being existing outside of time yet still experiencing time passing.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
No, that's determined by physics. Logic is something that can be determined without any outside observations, because a logical contradiction would be inherently nonsensical. Like a square circle, or a being existing outside of time yet still experiencing time passing.

As see, you're moving on to arithmetics ...

But still you cannot create a perfect circle out of matter or energy, because it can always be devided into lesser particles.
- So it's illogical .

Sentinent life forms cannot exist outside time, fact is time does not even exist. It's just something mankind invented to make things easier on them. - Using arithmetics though allows you to calculate on higher planes.
But it doesn't necessarely mean that there exist other dimensions, as in the physical sense you're imagine it.
For a creature to live it would need metabolism etc.

You're still not grasping the difference between a physical impossibility and a logical impossibility. A physical impossibility is something that can't happen according to what we know about how the universe works. A logical impossibility is something that contradicts itself and is inherently nonsensical.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
You're still not grasping the difference between a physical impossibility and a logical impossibility. A physical impossibility is something that can't happen according to what we know about how the universe works. A logical impossibility is something that contradicts itself and is inherently nonsensical.

Physically impossible to Move a Sun. Logically Impossible to move a sun with Pure physical strength.

Physically impossible to Run from Earth to the Moon.

Logically Impossible to Think linearly in an area where time doesn't exist.

You didn't give me a concrete example.
You can illustrate a perfect circle in physics, making up equations for it etc.
But you cannot build something like that when the components are not fitting.

It's illogical to warp reality, or to create/destroy matter.
And do you remember the first laws of physic?

You're mixing logic with fiction.