KharmaDog
Dyslexic Agnostic
Originally posted by Da Pittman
As are Pitbulls, all the other fighting breeds were breed for aggression, and other traits that would help them in the fighting ring and as the other over a long period of time this is no longer their primary use.
It's taken over 100 years to bred out the aggression in various breeds. Are you stating that PitBull Breeders did it faster than the other breeders? That being said, bred behaviour that is indicitive to each breed still can be found in said breed, no matter how diluted.
Originally posted by Da Pittman
There is no question that Pitbulls have more fatal attacks than another breed but that is not the point all fighting dogs in your opinion should be banned.
Please post where I said that.
Originally posted by Da Pittman
Pitbulls are not more likely to attack,
Please quote your research.
Originally posted by Da Pittman
The “meanest” dog I have ever known was a German Shepherd.
We are not talking about individual dogs, that would be a pointless debate. We are talking about breeds.
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
I missed your point? How so? You implied that dogs were bred for a specific purpose, that they have certain traits (Pit bulls and aggression) and I rebutted, saying that all dogs can potential have those traits: where did I miss your point?
I did not imply anything, It's a fact that dogs were bred for specific purposes. Saying that all dogs are capable of aggression is far different than saying that all dogs have been bred to emphasize their aggresion. Again, it seems that you miss the point.
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Yet, people are still breeding Pit Bulls to fight, not giving them the chance to be "companions"...
It seems as though you are agreeing with me here without even realizing it.
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Pomeranian's mauled a baby...stats still not mean anything?
So your argument is that 1 attack on a baby out of the tens of thousands of poms that have existed holds statistical merit in any argument whatsoever?
Once again, singular examples of dog behaviour do not dictate the characteristics endemic to the breed. Multiple examples, physical appearance and the very purpose that they were bred for, is a far better meter stick by which to measure a breed's characteristics.
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
My dog wasn't bred for that: my family has owned his lineage all the way down to his great-grandmother. So how am I irresponsible, naive, or stupid? My brother has a pitt bull that was treated like crap, left out in the cold, starved and all sorts of cruelness, yet he's trained him, and he's the most friendly dog I've ever seen.
Once again, people seem to have no concept of the work that breeders take to impart or dimish characteristics in particular dog breeds. A family of humans owning a family of dogs has little or no effect on breed integrity. As for the example of your brother, that's very nice, but proves nothing.