superskrull vs storm

Started by Doctor-Alvis6 pages

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Sounds like someone's scared.

I would of totally fallen for that if you flapped your elbows up and down and went "Bock bock bock!" You're pretty pressed to present something worth breaking away my current affairs.

I knew you wouldn't, why do you think I was so adamant about challenging you??

Uhh... because I told you repeatedly that I wouldn't do it and people want what they can't have?

Furthermore, I have more to go on in my interpretation than you do.

That goes for everyone on the board.


More to go on? You mean wikipedia!? All you have is your own word, which doesn't go as far as I could throw it. Which isn't very far because words are intangible.

In the end you just showed you have absolutely nothing to go on.

That's all I needed.

bubye🙂

I called it.

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
you have a history of over skipping dozens of valid points to reply to one unrelated sentence with "nuh-uh" or something to that effect.
Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
I called it.

The sign of a fantastic debater.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
In the end you just showed you have absolutely nothing to go on.

That's all I needed.

bubye🙂

Bye wave

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
I called it.

Called what??

You had no point that was cogent to what I asked you to do.

That's all I really cared about. 🙂

The more you reply without meeting the terms of my request, the more it seems that I am correct in my estimation that you can't back up your claims/interpretations with evidence.

The red herring won't save you. 🙂

You will find that this is a recurring themse with Storm detractors-- They can't support their claims.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Called what??

You had no point that was cogent to what I asked you to do.


It was mostly the part of me pointing out the how weak your opinion on this is then you reply... by telling me how weak my opinion is on this.

The more you reply without meeting the terms of my request, the more it seems that I am correct in my estimation that you can't back up your claims/interpretations with evidence.

Can you give me a valid reason to do you a favor? Better yet, use critical thinking. Analyze the situation. How many valid pros and cons can you come up with for me doing this? If you won't, I will.

The red herring won't save you. 🙂

What red herring?

You will find that this is a recurring themse with Storm detractors-- They can't support their claims.

I mostly find it with you. I'm not saying other people don't have errors in their methods, I just don't read them.

blah

You copped out when you realized you couldn't do it. Rather than admit that, you go on and on about pros and cons and whole bunch of other irrelevant bullshit rather than do what is asked of you.

You have a certain stance, prove it.

If you can't, you just can't. There are not "buts" about it.

It was a stright-up request.

You attempted the first time and failed, and now you're saving face in lieu of the second challenge.

You were correct on one thing, I did expect more because you make these claims and I thought SURE you had a WEALTH of information to back you up.

You apparently don't.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
blah

You copped out when you realized you couldn't do it. Rather than admit that, you go on and on about pros and cons and whole bunch of other irrelevant bullshit rather than do what is asked of you.

You have a certain stance, prove it.


It is completely relevant. Who am I proving this to? You? Laughable. Whether or not you agree or disagree with my stance doesn't matter and your credibility is irreparably damaged anyway. Whether or not you agree with that doesn't matter because it doesn't change what you are in my eyes.

So I beseech thee, why should I even bother? Why should I take the time to do this when leading you around like a lost puppy on this is far more fun than debate and unnecessary legwork?

You attempted the first time and failed, and now you're saving face in lieu of the second challenge.

You were correct on one thing, I did expect more because you make these claims and I thought SURE you had a WEALTH of information to back you up.

You apparently don't.


I did what I said I would. Nothing more, nothing less. You can't hand in manure and expect diamonds in return. I'm truly that lazy.

No, you're truly that INCAPABLE.😂

Run along.

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
you have a history of over skipping dozens of valid points to reply to one unrelated sentence with "nuh-uh" or something to that effect.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
No, you're truly that INCAPABLE.😂

Run along.

wave Hello pot.

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis

Until you do what I asked you to do, you will always look like a copping out, dodging, incapable debater. ✅

The only thing I want to see is analysis.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Until you do what I asked you to do, you will always look like a copping out, dodging, incapable debater. ✅

To a single poster with no cred on a comic book subforum? I'm not seeing a downside to being lazy on this.

It's like Noah Wyle giving a doctor medical advice here.

The only thing I want to see is analysis.

And I'd like to show you one. Wait, no, I wouldn't. If it was a bunch of people and I respected them some, maybe I would.

What I said stands✅

You just pwned yourself.

What is "pwned"?

Originally posted by 2damnloud
What I said stands✅

You just pwned yourself.

dur

SS chokes her to death. SS 10/10.

Originally posted by Doctor-Alvis
What is "pwned"?

What you just did to yourself by not responding with an analysis yet AGAIN and trying to save face by being condescending and basically saying "You're beneath me that's why I'm not doing it."

You still lost.✅

Originally posted by 2damnloud
What you just did to yourself by not responding with an analysis yet AGAIN and trying to save face by being condescending and basically saying "You're beneath me that's why I'm not doing it."

You still lost.✅

dur