Originally posted by InnerRise
Although I had nothing to do with how the sister looked and whether she was hot or not, I'll respond by saying that there's nothing logical about this at all and to think that this troubled teen was thinking logically about any of this is mind boggling.anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
Even insane acts are done through reasoning, bad reasoning perhaps but still. To simply say that every insane act was done without reasoning because that person is insane, is not only incredibly stupid it's also dangerous.
This person didn't just grab a hammer and went over there and ****ed a corpse. There was something some emotion driving him. That emotion was likely lust. After all lust is the most important driving factor in sex.
Well, as for the depression or depression treatment being the blamed reason, I'd have to ask where those packets of meds are with the instructions tha warn "May cause patient to f**k their dead sister".
As for whether or not it was a "predictable response of disgust" thread,
of course its a bloody disgusting travesty.
When I asked last week, The bastard told me he didn't have a hammer.....!!!! 😛 (j/k)
McDonalds funded the I.R.A in the eighties.
Well that was one US company convieniently overlooked somewhat when Bush was drawing up his hitlist of those in the past who had in the past funded terrorism.
At least they weren't raping their dead sisters, I suppose.
Well....not in a non-metaphorical sense, anyhow.
Thats that issue hammered out, 😖hifty: I guess.
Speaking of which...
Did the guy not see the note on Hammer saying "Can't touch this"?
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
McDonalds funded the I.R.A in the eighties.Well that was one US company convieniently overlooked somewhat when Bush was drawing up his hitlist of those in the past who had in the past funded terrorism.
At least they weren't raping their dead sisters, I suppose.
Well....not in a non-metaphorical sense, anyhow.Thats that issue hammered out, 😖hifty: I guess.
Speaking of which...
Did the guy not see the note on Hammer saying "Can't touch this"?
McDonalds directly funded the Irish Republican Army...are you certain about that?
There are also several facets of the I.R.A., some more extreme than others, so calling them "terrorist" outright, is dishonest.
T'was widely reported in the late eighties over here.
Of that at least Im certain.
(Not too far off of the time that ST:TNG had that episode that referred to the IRA having won against the British as past events.)
Absolutely. We're talking the hands-on-end, not just sinn-fein, was the vibe of it. That was the gist I got.
But in anycase, it was as legitimate notable case as the case of Cat Stevens's post 9/11 treatment, I guess...
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
T'was widely reported in the late eighties over here.
Of that at least Im certain.
(Not too far off of the time that ST:TNG had that episode that referred to the IRA having won against the British as past events.)Absolutely. We're talking the hands-on-end, not just sinn-fein, was the vibe of it. That was the gist I got.
But in anycase, it was as legitimate notable case as the case of Cat Stevens's post 9/11 treatment, I guess...
It was an urban legend/complete bullshit. The acronym "IRA" which appears on McDonalds payslips stands for "Individual Retirement Account"; not "Irish Republican Army". It was a hoax that gained a life of it's own, as some do.
LOL Actually Ive just read that too doing some research...
OK.... Thanks for the pointing in the right direction.
That Noraid moneytrail thing was still tenuously hanging in there.
That probably served to perpetuate the chat of it.
I must admit that from what I can see online, that the tabloids had being shortstroking about it, perhaps jumping the gun.
Guess my only remaining point is that its just as accurate a case/claim than "45 mins" and the fiscal link witchhunts that followed 9/11 for the likes of Cat Stevens.
Originally posted by Fishy
It would be more logical to kill and then have sex with somebody you lust after then somebody who is but ugly. Unless he wanted to use sex as a form of punishment. But it would have been more logical to keep her alive if he wanted to punish her, so he likely lusted after her.Meaning that she was likely good looking.
If she's good looking why use a sledge-hammer ? Why not just strangle her instead of turning her head to pulp.
Id heard of a school of thought about damage=change=control over the victim before.
Perhaps that might have been a factor or even a prerequiste for such an act..? Who knows...?
As for the choice of weapon, it could be simply that he couldn't find a screwdriver. I know mine keep disappearing when I need em.