Originally posted by quanchi112
the sarcasm is way overboard here. its like you try to be funny way to much.
Try? Judging by the responses I usually get, there is no 'try.'
😉.
Besides, sometimes my sarcasm is just for the sake of sarcasm. Other times(oft times) it's to point out a logical inconsistency in another poster's argument.
Originally posted by Soljeru just cant ressit mocking posters. dont try and fool anyone. it doesnt affect me so i could really care less unless its just bashing and thats it.
Try? Judging by the responses I usually get, there is no 'try.'😉.
Besides, sometimes my sarcasm is just for the sake of sarcasm. Other times(oft times) it's to point out a logical inconsistency in another poster's argument.
Originally posted by quanchi112
u just cant ressit mocking posters. dont try and fool anyone. it doesnt affect me so i could really care less unless its just bashing and thats it.
I'm not trying to fool anyone.
Like I said, sometimes I'm sarcastic for the sheer sake of sarcasm.
However, my sarcastic minded posts about Wonder Woman's battle prowess stemming from her breasts? That wasn't for the sake of mockery or the sake of sarcasm. It was to point out a logical inconsistency.
The easiest and most straight forward way to prove an argument form is invalid is to provide a counter example.
Originally posted by Soljerto me its nearly the same as some saying prove thor is stronger than aunt may. as i have seen so many posters pull on here when they disagree with something someone just asked them. its avoiding a question while throwing up another questions.
I'm not trying to fool anyone.Like I said, sometimes I'm sarcastic for the sheer sake of sarcasm.
However, my sarcastic minded posts about Wonder Woman's battle prowess stemming from her breasts? That wasn't for the sake of mockery or the sake of sarcasm. It was to point out a logical inconsistency.
The easiest and most straight forward way to prove an argument form is invalid is to provide a counter example.
Originally posted by quanchi112
to me its nearly the same as some saying prove thor is stronger than aunt may. as i have seen so many posters pull on here when they disagree with something someone just asked them. its avoiding a question while throwing up another questions.
That was, again, to point out a logical inconsistency.
You can't prove that one character is absolutely stronger than another unless there has been a direct comparison between the two, or one has succeeded at a feat that the other has failed at.
Which weighed more - half of eternity, or the Midgard Serpent?
Wonder Woman fans would say that half of eternity was heavier. Thor fans will assert that the Midgard Serpent HAD to weigh as much as the Earth. Wonder Woman fans will assert that it couldn't. Thor fans will assert that....
Likewise, Wonder Woman's never tried to lift the Midgard Serpent, so who says she'd fail? Thor's never tried to lift eternity, so who says he'd fail?
Similarly, Aunt May has never tried to move celestial bodies, go toe to toe with the Hulk or Superman, she's never attempted any of these feats - so who is to say that SHE would fail?
You can't absolutely prove that Wonder Woman is stronger or weaker than Thor, in the same fashion that you cannot absolutely prove that Thor is stronger or weaker than Aunt May.
It's a parallel argument, a counter example, which exposes a logical inconsistency in someone's 'challenge.'
Originally posted by Soljer😐
That was, again, to point out a logical inconsistency.You can't prove that one character is absolutely stronger than another unless there has been a direct comparison between the two, or one has succeeded at a feat that the other has failed at.
Which weighed more - half of eternity, or the Midgard Serpent?
Wonder Woman fans would say that half of eternity was heavier. Thor fans will assert that the Midgard Serpent HAD to weigh as much as the Earth. Wonder Woman fans will assert that it couldn't. Thor fans will assert that....
Likewise, Wonder Woman's never tried to lift the Midgard Serpent, so who says she'd fail? Thor's never tried to lift eternity, so who says he'd fail?
Similarly, Aunt May has never tried to move celestial bodies, go toe to toe with the Hulk or Superman, she's never attempted any of these feats - so who is to say that SHE would fail?
You can't absolutely prove that Wonder Woman is stronger or weaker than Thor, in the same fashion that you cannot absolutely prove that Thor is stronger or weaker than Aunt May.
It's a parallel argument, a counter example, which exposes a logical inconsistency in someone's 'challenge.'
Originally posted by starkingnver will fail. it wont happen for a while though im sure. we havent decided on a cut off point yet and ill need to read 7 soldiers and catch up on ds's latest showings.
You know Quan, if Nver somehow failed, then I would love to take you on.
when i do beat nver i am going ot debate with air legend more than likely.
i will be representing thanos with the heart vs his preretcon beyonder.
but after that i would be more thanhappy to debate with you here.