Superman one million vs Galactus

Originally posted by Utrigita
Sorry that was just what i thought. Too hold two pieces of a given substance together isn't as difficuelt as holding two equal pieces of a substance together while moving them from one point to another while still holding them. 😕 but please expand my horizon and field of learning.

I would say it depends on what the substances are made of and what they are contained in. If I use a glue I can stick many objects together. If I use a container I can carry two substances together from place to place.

Originally posted by Zebedee
I would say it depends on what the substances are made of and what they are contained in. If I use a glue I can stick many objects together. If I use a container I can carry two substances together from place to place.

of cause there are a number of factors that needs to be considerate but lets take the situation here Superman 1M is holding together a Galaxy and Galactus is teleporting it from one point in the universe to the next.

My immediate conclusion would be that teleporting (a process that requires a moving while holding a object together) is more difficult then holding a object that isn't moving together. I know that teleportation happens instantly but the person that is teleporting the object still needs to the mindful of the objects composition.

This is just my thoughts I have only had Physic at B level so....

Originally posted by Utrigita
of cause there are a number of factors that needs to be considerate but lets take the situation here Superman 1M is holding together a Galaxy and Galactus is teleporting it from one point in the universe to the next.

My immediate conclusion would be that teleporting (a process that requires a moving while holding a object together) is more difficult then holding a object that isn't moving together. I know that teleportation happens instantly but the person that is teleporting the object still needs to the mindful of the objects composition.

This is just my thoughts I have only had Physic at B level so....

Why does a person need to be mindfull of an objects composition to teleport it? This would only be needed if it was being teleported ala Star Trek, where it is broken down and reassembled. If it is more a case of the a tube is opened surrounding an object from point A to point B and the object "falls" down this tube, composition would not be required. Knowledge of Physics is not the issue here, as apart from Quantum teleportation, which actually relies on subatomic particles being everywhere at once, no kind of teleportation on the macroscopic scale has or I believe ever will occur in the real world.

Originally posted by Zebedee
Why does a person need to be mindfull of an objects composition to teleport it? This would only be needed if it was being teleported ala Star Trek, where it is broken down and reassembled. If it is more a case of the a tube is opened surrounding an object from point A to point B and the object "falls" down this tube, composition would not be required. Knowledge of Physics is not the issue here, as apart from Quantum teleportation, which actually relies on subatomic particles being everywhere at once, no kind of teleportation on the macroscopic scale has or I believe ever will occur in the real world.

I don't know how its done in Marvel but from some scans I would say its the same way as its done in startrek. And a Quantum Teleportation have taken place if I remember correctly it was millimeters but never the less it toke place.

Originally posted by Zebedee
Why does a person need to be mindfull of an objects composition to teleport it? This would only be needed if it was being teleported ala Star Trek, where it is broken down and reassembled. If it is more a case of the a tube is opened surrounding an object from point A to point B and the object "falls" down this tube, composition would not be required. Knowledge of Physics is not the issue here, as apart from Quantum teleportation, which actually relies on subatomic particles being everywhere at once, no kind of teleportation on the macroscopic scale has or I believe ever will occur in the real world.

Quantum teleportation moves information not matter. IIRC the idea is that the what's at each end changes.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Quantum teleportation moves information not matter. IIRC the idea is that the what's at each end changes.

Quantum bits are not really information in a macroscopic sense, it's really about changing the initial state to overcome uncertainty, it's also not instantaneous. It may be useful in comunication though. In a digital Quantum system with 2 states. If we call these 0 and 1.

I think about it in terms of "hot potato."

Moving the potato is certainly easier than having to hold it in your hands for a prolonged period of time.

Originally posted by Avlon
I think about it in terms of "hot potato."

Moving the potato is certainly easier than having to hold it in your hands for a prolonged period of time.

Originally posted by Harry Fingerman
Not if you're Superman or Galactus... 😖hifty:

Cosmic potato ftw!

Galactus laughs at him, gets fun of him and then kills him horribly.

One could say the same of Galactus. Do you even
know who superman one million is?

Originally posted by Sirius77
One could say the same of Galactus. Do you even
know who superman one million is?

Originally posted by Sirius77
One could say the same of Galactus. Do you even
know who superman one million is?

A powerful descendent of Superman with imp lineage, but who was no imp himself.

I was asking miraclethree, but thanks any way.

Originally posted by Harry Fingerman
Someone who's not going to beat Galactus?

Thor did it. Superman one million can do it better.

Originally posted by Sirius77
Thor did it. Superman one million can do it better.

Originally posted by Sirius77
Thor did it. Superman one million can do it better.

Plus, he also doesn't have the luxury of firing his most powerful attack at a starving, distracted Galactus, fighting Ego.

Otherwise, Galactus almost killed Thor earlier, and he dropped Thor a time after that like nothing.

Originally posted by Harry Fingerman
Superman doesn't have the godblast.

Plus, he also doesn't have the luxury of firing his most powerful attack at a starving, distracted Galactus, fighting Ego.

Otherwise, Galactus almost killed Thor earlier, and he dropped Thor a time after that like nothing.

Superman one million may not have the godblast,
but he does have fifth dimensional blood and force
vision, which is more than enough.

Originally posted by Sirius77
Superman one million may not have the godblast,
but he does have fifth dimensional blood and force
vision, which is more than enough.

You also forgot to acknowledge Galactus being distracted and starving...

Originally posted by Harry Fingerman
I kind of doubt that force vision has the destructive power of a godblast.
He held a galaxy, and whatshisface.
He didn't destroy things.
Hell, that doesn't even say he could hold Galactus.

You also forgot to acknowledge Galactus being distracted and starving...

It doesn't matter, Galactus has never shown himself
to be good at fighting fast moving targets. He's very
powerful, and slow...

I was only disproving you're argument about the godblast,
and force vision is more powerful than the godblast, imo.

Also, Galactus' durability isn't that great either, Tenebrous
and Aegis took him down pretty easily. Not that they're
pushovers, but the real interesting thing is that the Silver
Surfer was also able to take the same hits that Galactus
did, and even channel the energies in which he was being
hit with and kill Tenabrous and Aegis simultameously.
So, going by that, I'd say that it would take a long time, but
Superman one million would put him down. Not without a
few broken bones, though.