Man Cures Himself of HIV

Started by SpearofDestiny5 pages
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Urizen needs to feel popular or else he'll get AIDS.

You are probably thee worst representative of Christianity this site has seen short of Marcello 👇

********

And yes, Alliance, I agree with you. Technically you can beat the virus, but it has to be more than just "luck", at least in case with Andrew Stimpson.

There are many theories concerning Andrew Stimpson's case, as well as the prostitutes from Kenya.

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Why was this merged? It was two different topics

It's the same topic, I came up with it first 👇

Go back to the OTF

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Urizen needs to feel popular or else he'll get AIDS.

Being "popular" is how you get AIDS.

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
You are probably thee worst representative of Christianity this site has seen short of Marcello 👇

********

And yes, [b]Alliance, I agree with you. Technically you can beat the virus, but it has to be more than just "luck", at least in case with Andrew Stimpson.

There are many theories concerning Andrew Stimpson's case, as well as the prostitutes from Kenya.

It's the same topic, I came up with it first 👇

Go back to the OTF [/B]

You fail, because... Man curing himself of Aids, and Scientist figuring out how to Neutralize it.. Different topics.

science tells us that it is impossible for the bodies immune system to overcome any strand of the HIV virus. Science does change because their is no such thing as fact though so its possible, but is more likely a myth with an explanation

Science tells you nothing. wtf is "science"

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
science tells us that it is impossible for the bodies immune system to overcome any strand of the HIV virus. Science does change because their is no such thing as fact though so its possible, but is more likely a myth with an explanation

"There are no facts"... Is that a fact?

Originally posted by Robtard
"There are no facts"... Is that a fact?

it's more of an idea 😛

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
You are probably thee worst representative of Christianity this site has seen short of Marcello 👇

Oh, shut up, you bloody twit. Contrary to popular belief, Christians are humans, and humans have senses of humor in addition to the ability to feel annoyed at your bullshit.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Being "popular" is how you get AIDS.

😆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Being "popular" is how you get AIDS.

He's probably a bug-chaser for the attention-whoring he can do.

So, just to clear it up, you think him having a boyfriend with HIV makes him a bug chaser?

Also, do you think there are really people out there who are seeking out AIDs? Or are you just calling them bug-chasers because they have sex with people to whom they are not married?

Originally posted by Devil King
So, just to clear it up, you think him having a boyfriend with HIV makes him a bug chaser?

Also, do you think there are really people out there who are seeking out AIDs? Or are you just calling them bug-chasers because they have sex with people to whom they are not married?


1. He has a boyfriend with HIV?
2. Yes, I do believe that they exist, which is why the term "bug-chaser" exists.
3. No, bug-chasing doesn't necessarily equate to promiscuity. (At least, as far as I know.)

So, Stimpson wanted AIDs. Is that what you're saying?

People with AIDs don't deserve to be loved?

Originally posted by Devil King
So, Stimpson wanted AIDs. Is that what you're saying?

People with AIDs don't deserve to be loved?


I thought we were talking about Urizen, and your conclusion that I believe that "Stimpson wanted AIDS" is a straw man. Then your question about people with AIDS not deserving to be loved is an exponential increase in an attempt at a straw man.

It's not a straw man if I'm asking you a question about why you called him a "bug-chaser".

You brought that term into the discussion. Now, I'm just asking you to clearify. There are far too many question marks in my posts for it to be considered a strawman.

The words of Zeal are quite worthless...don't stress over it Devil King 🙂

Originally posted by Devil King
It's not a straw man if I'm asking you a question about why you called him a "bug-chaser".

You brought that term into the discussion. Now, I'm just asking you to clearify. There are far too many question marks in my posts for it to be considered a strawman.

Zeal is a Christian who thinks Homosexuality is wrong. He feels AIDS is a suitable consequence for one who routinely "practices homosexuality".

Atleast that is how it seems. I can't imagine how he wouldn't feel that way, when he can refer to a Gay man as a "bug chaser".

He isn't calling gay men bug chasers.

He first referred to Andrew Stimpson as a "bug chaser" since he chose to have unprotected anal sex with his HIV positive boyfreind, after his initial diagnosis of being HIV positive himself. He saw no point in using protection.

Then I think Zeal referred to me as one, for the number of hook ups I have had.

I don't know or care, I just don't thnk his opinion is worth regarding