Lesbians

Started by lord xyz13 pages

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I was actually. Ask Bardock.

I don't really see the difference between saying and implying in this scenario.

Ermm, cool.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Shut the **** up.
No.

However, Chillmeistergen is one of the last people we should be nitpicking for his grammar and punctuation because he does a pretty, damn-good job
Well, I'm an expert, I must ....point....it....out...lol

Originally posted by dadudemon
If only your mocking that one specific word held any ground...
Incorrect grammar here.

😂

Originally posted by lord xyz
Incorrect grammar here.

Prove it. I could have sworn we have been over the ellipses thing before.

Grammar nazis stop spamming my thread!!!

Originally posted by dadudemon
If only your mocking that one specific word held any ground...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pretty

With an extraneous article adjective in my last sentence, you could have actually had a legitimate "nitpick".

Until next time, enjoy our wild America.

...what?

Originally posted by debbiejo

Well, I'm an expert, I must ....point....it....out...lol

We're discussing grammar, not head.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Prove it. I could have sworn we have been over the ellipses thing before.
I was talking about you forgetting to use "of".

All these KS3 English teachers.

Hahaha. Key Stage 3 is write your name joined up.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Hahaha. Key Stage 3 is write your name joined up.

That's not what an application of Blooms taxonomy might say. It is probably the truth though. A number of people on here would not be able to cope.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I was talking about you forgetting to use "of".

I am not seeing the need for the word "of".

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
...what?

Exactly.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Exactly.

No, really.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
No, really.

Do you want me to explain it a different way or are you needing me to speak a little louder gramps? 😄

Just want to see where you're going wrong.

Thanks for making this the most disappointing thread I've ever laid eyes on...

Originally posted by Bardiel13
Thanks for making this the most disappointing thread I've ever laid eyes on...

Yes we want hot, weaty, damp lesbian teen action!!! Stop ruining it grammar nazi guys!!!!!

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Hahaha. Key Stage 3 is write your name joined up.
In pen!

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Just want to see where you're going wrong.

Now I don't follow you. I clearly indicated that your criticism of my use of the word "pretty" was invalid seeing as the context in which the word was used had a corresponding definition for it on Dictionary.com. I was then explaining that you could have pointed out my elimination of the word "a", an article adjective, from the last sentence in my post.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Now I don't follow you. I clearly indicated that your criticism of my use of the word "pretty" was invalid seeing as the context in which the word was used had a corresponding definition for it on Dictionary.com. I was then explaining that you could have pointed out my elimination of the word "a", an article adjective, from the last sentence in my post.

But the lesbians......

Think of the Lesbians...... 🙁

I want lesbians.