Originally posted by Burning thoughtthe wow heroes are wow characters are they not? Then my words are not wrong.
she was commenting on my Bias towards the WoW heroes, the people in the debate itself, not anything to do with the other WoW characters like Illidan.
Originally posted by Burning thoughtbecause they are previously established criteria, its not up to us to prove the positioning of each character's placement each time someone wan't to change or add a new character.
You keep saying that, but then why should someone prove themselves to others who have not either,
Originally posted by Burning thoughtMarvel's become a wiki, as in edited by fans including fans that overhype haracter abilities like those that think the hulk, wolverine, or storm should be universal level.
i can claim at least small scraps of knowledge on the various marvel characters, things the Marvel profile page tells me but you guys seemed to have no thought to Kains powers,
Originally posted by Burning thoughtNightcrawler
you take into account him surviving things but can wovlerine teleport?
Originally posted by Burning thoughtStorm
can he control weather,
Originally posted by Burning thoughtCyclops, Jubilee, gambit etc...
energy,
t
Originally posted by Burning thoughtforge.
time
Originally posted by Burning thoughtNightcrawler, magik
move through dimensions?
Originally posted by Burning thoughtgreat he can do what a bunch of metas can do. why should he be above high meta?
no...my arguments were far more varied yet you picked upon small things. Just becauses theres lower characters who can do one thing that kain can do, if Kain can do a huge range of things which he can, then he deserves higher for sure
Originally posted by Burning thoughtSee? there you go again. I'm biased for not agreeing with you. That's why you get labeled a fanboy, because that's exactly what a fanboy does. "You're biased for not thinking that my character is as awesome as I do!"
and your being biased for not taking that into account.
Originally posted by Burning thoughtDante wasn't being discussed, and again with the "You don't agree with me you're biased bullshit.
You also did not take into account the placing of other characters (dante) and put a character who can do greater powers than he lower on the lader, which is bias...
Originally posted by Burning thoughtHe was completely irrelivant.
no matter how irrelevent "you" thought it was.
Originally posted by Burning thoughtArchimonde dies. That's the story. Not hard to get is it? ARchimonde died as part of the story. The specifics of it being the players is part of the mechanics. Who knows? Maybe in the future we'll have more releases and higher levels and some one will be able to solo Archimonde. The first time you go up against val cleft you need a party.. unless you wait... but I can solo the deadmines in west fall. The number of players, they type, their names the gear they had and any other variable that can change is unimportant. What's important is the fact that storywise he dies.
are you not reading waht ime puting before you, as i was saying, your saying "the characters in game" can beat archimonde so you think this is the story,
Originally posted by Burning thoughtYes. as its not part of the story.
wheras none of this has been writen in story, the characters dont excist in story, so in a real fight without CIS do you deny Archi being able to destroy them with ease?
Originally posted by Burning thoughtAre you always an idiot like this? Did I say that Ganon was going to? Did I say that ganon would win? Did I say that Dante would win?
its foolish...you cant honestly belive that comment you put was worthy of discussion, can you honestly belive Ganons going to try and convince Dante not to harm him? or even try to?
No, I just attacked the inaccurate statement that you couldn't use your inteligence to keep from being shot.
You can use your intelligence to keep from being shot. and I gave an example of how: by talking your way out of it. now quit acting like an idiot.