Superman vs Silver surfer

Started by Supeprime387 pages
Originally posted by darthgoober
That would depend on the weakness though. He might not sense that he can one shot someone via hitting them in a specific place, but something like a vulnerability to a particular form of radiation... sure it would(he's demonstrated as much against the Hulk and Gladiator). Whether or not he'll chooses to capitalize on it is another matter, but in forum fights characters fight smart so he'll use the ability every time just as Supes will try to blitz the Hulk every time.

The Surfer just sensed the Gamma energy/rads within the Hulk and used his powers to take advantage, his cosmic senses were definitely at work there, but it wasn't him sensing his weakness, it was the Surfer sensing the Hulk's energies and being smart. As for the instance with GLADS, there is nothing to suggest he didn't just have prior knowledge of Kallark's weakness, as opposed to him using his senses to find this weakness of his. All that is merely assumption on your part.

Supeprime you should stick around.

Originally posted by Supeprime
The Surfer just sensed the Gamma energy/rads within the Hulk and used his powers to take advantage, his cosmic senses were definitely at work there, but it wasn't him sensing his weakness, it was the Surfer sensing the Hulk's energies and being smart. As for the instance with GLADS, there is nothing to suggest he didn't just have prior knowledge of Kallark's weakness, as opposed to him using his senses to find this weakness of his. All that is merely assumption on your part.

No the assumption being made on your part in assuming that he already had the knowledge. I'm not saying that Surfer found out about his weakness through his cosmic senses(though I'm of the firm opinion that he did), I'm saying that he was ABLE to exploit the weakness because of his cosmic senses. Surfer himself said that it was a SPECIFIC form of radiation that would allow him to down Glads with one blast. By the same token, he gets knowledge of K-nite from forum rules, his cosmic awareness allows him to find the particular frequency of the radiation that will affect Supes.

Originally posted by Supeprime
Ohhhhh I get it. You like to use your own assumptions of what the Surfer can do as facts in order to to add aspects to his abilities he doesn't actually have. Thanks for clarifying that. Bwahahahaha!

lol no feminine phrase this time?

and im assuming? Where on panel did surfer find out about Gladiators weakness? Its not common knowledge and so please show where such a weakness was revealed to surfer.

So, while ur premise is supported by nothing on panel. Mine is supported by the fact that surfer has used his cosmic senses to determine very specific details about characters prior to that incident. I wonder which makes more sense 😱

Originally posted by darthgoober
No the assumption being made on your part in assuming that he already had the knowledge. I'm not saying that Surfer found out about his weakness through his cosmic senses(though I'm of the firm opinion that he did), I'm saying that he was ABLE to exploit the weakness because of his cosmic senses. Surfer himself said that it was a SPECIFIC form of radiation that would allow him to down Glads with one blast. By the same token, he gets knowledge of K-nite from forum rules, his cosmic awareness allows him to find the particular frequency of the radiation that will affect Supes.

LoL. YOU HAVE NO PROOF. While I frankly, don't really need any, considering the wealth of appearances the Surfer has were he has never demonstrated the ability to discern anyone's weakness via his senses. But you can feel free to keep trying to spin things, honeybunch.

Originally posted by Naija Boy
lol im assuming? Where on panel did surfer find out about Gladiators weakness? Its not common knowledge and so please show where such a weakness was revealed to surfer.So, while ur premise is supported by nothing on panel. Mine is supported by the fact that surfer has used his cosmic senses to determine very specific details about characters. I wonder which makes more sense

Where on panel did the Surfer use his senses to find out Glad's weakness? Again, feel free to post some scans where the Surfer to know an opponents specific weakness via his cosmic sense.

Although I am sure you won't, and will continue to prattle on with your nonsensical arguement based off of your conjecture, cuddle bunny.

Everyone seems to have forgotten that surfer is facing three different types of superman.

All Star = 50/50
Sundipped = 45/100
PC = 1000/100

Originally posted by Supeprime

Where on panel did the Surfer use his senses to find out Glad's weakness? Again, feel free to post some scans where the Surfer to know an opponents specific weakness via his cosmic sense.

Although I am sure you won't, and will continue to prattle on with your nonsensical arguement based off of your conjecture, cuddle bunny.

Keep those names coming.

Where On panel did surfer gain knowledge of glads weakness? I have nearly evry surfer comic and know for a fact that such never happened.
So what we have in this scenario is surfer unexplainably gaining knowledge of glads weakness.

1.First option is that we assume he got the knowledge through some unknown means since nothing is shown on panel in this regard

2. Option 2, we infer based on prior evidence of his ability to discern specific details about people via cosmic senses that he made use of those cosmic senses to do so.

Option 1= Baseless assumption supported by nothing on panel
Option2= Logical inference based on prior on panel evidence of similar abilities.

Quite obvious which is nonsensical and which isnt.

Originally posted by Supeprime
LoL. YOU HAVE NO PROOF. While I frankly, don't really need any, considering the wealth of appearances the Surfer has were he has never demonstrated the ability to discern anyone's weakness via his senses. But you can feel free to keep trying to spin things, honeybunch.

But he has demonstrated it against Glads. You may choose to refuse to accept that just because they didn't spell it out for you just as someone may refuse to accept that the answer to the equation...

1,597-153

...is 1,444 just because they never seen that particular equation printed in a text book, but if we do the math it IS the answer whether it's ever been printed outright or not. If you want to be unreasonable in what you accept as evidence because you can't do math then that's on you, but you're nvr going to be happy at KMC if you need everything spelled out like that for you...

Originally posted by darthgoober
But he has demonstrated it against Glads. You may choose to refuse to accept that just because they didn't spell it out for you just as someone may refuse to accept that the answer to the equation...

1,597-153

...is 1,444 just because they never seen that particular equation printed in a text book, but if we do the math it IS the answer whether it's ever been printed outright or not. If you want to be unreasonable in what you accept as evidence because you can't do math then that's on you, but you're [B]nvr going to be happy at KMC if you need everything spelled out like that for you... [/B]

The fact that you actually took the time to write that LAUGHABLE NONSENSE, makes me feel quite sad for you

Srsly.

LoL.

Originally posted by Naija boy

Option 1= Baseless assumption supported by nothing on panel

I find this particular part of your post quite ironic.

NumNums.

Originally posted by Supeprime
I find this particular part of your post quite ironic.
NumNums.

Interesting. care to explain? but no worries if thats to much for u.

Originally posted by Naija boy
Interesting. care to explain? but no worries if thats to much for u.

I would have thought that would have been obvious. Since you obviously like to make assumptions, how dare I stop you from doing that now?

You see what I did there, chocolate chip?

Originally posted by Supeprime
The fact that you actually took the time to write that LAUGHABLE NONSENSE, makes me feel quite sad for you

Srsly.

LoL.


Feel free to feel that way. There's been many a fangirl that's expressed similar sentiments, but I'm still here while they're long gone...

Not that you yourself are a fangirl mind you(since you're listed as a guy and not really being a "fan" of anyone at present), I was just pointing out that my reasoning seems to stand the test of time while your's seems to crop up now and then before fading away...

Omigosh.

Supeprime is making me question my sexuality bigtime.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Feel free to feel that way. There's been many a fangirl that's expressed similar sentiments, but I'm still here while they're long gone...

Not that you yourself are a fangirl mind you(since you're listed as a guy and not really being a "fan" of anyone at present), I was just pointing out that my reasoning seems to stand the test of time while your's seems to crop up now and then before fading away...

....to a place where people actually use logic and not fanboyish assumptions, squirt.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Omigosh.

Supeprime is making me question my sexuality bigtime.

Pants get just a little tighter there, brah?

Originally posted by Supeprime
I would have thought that would have been obvious. Since you obviously like to make assumptions, how dare I stop you from doing that now?

You see what I did there, chocolate chip?

I see it alright. Still waiting for on panel evidence o support ur stance though 😉

Originally posted by Supeprime
....to a place where people actually use logic and not fanboyish assumptions, squirt.

How can they "use logic" without making ANY assumptions? Doesn't the process of utilizing logic for deductive reasoning require there to be some question that hasn't been figured via some other means(such as being spelled outright on panel)? If it's all spelled out, logic isn't realty being used to answer anything...

Originally posted by Naija boy
I see it alright. Still waiting for on panel evidence o support ur stance though 😉

You're flirting with Quanchi-level stupidity if you actually think you have posted anything remotely close to proving your claim, porkchop.

Originally posted by Supeprime
Pants get just a little tighter there, brah?

Just a little. I think its the 'honeybuns' thing. The 'brah' doesn't work though, thank God.