Less than a day and we're on page 7? Dang. If I had the time to keep up with everything, I'd consider joining...but I probably don't at the moment. These days it takes a lot of attention to stay up on changes and use it to your advantage.
I'll judge if there's a post limit in matches, so if you need judges, you can put me on the list ill.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Less than a day and we're on page 7? Dang. If I had the time to keep up with everything, I'd consider joining...but I probably don't at the moment. These days it takes a lot of attention to stay up on changes and use it to your advantage.I'll judge if there's a post limit in matches, so if you need judges, you can put me on the list ill.
Thanks Digi.
This thing won't get kicked off until late November so if you want to be a combatant you have time. The drafts aren't until 11/10 (tentatively).
Originally posted by Soljer
An amalgam would be slightly more interesting.Especially if you didn't have the OPTION of picking one of your foes characters, but you actually were REQUIRED to switch at least one character each match.
Much more interesting outcome, methinks...
Would people prefer to add a character to your roster or swap a character out?
Originally posted by illadelph12
Would people prefer to add a character to your roster or swap a character out?
Adding one to the roster would give a new level of versatility each round.
Swapping one out adds a new layer of strategy.
I, personally, think that swapping one out would make the matches harder, more interesting, and more varied. So it isn't all about who can pick the best characters, because, well...after they pick the best characters, they have to start losing said characters. 😛.
Originally posted by Soljer
Adding one to the roster would give a new level of versatility each round.Swapping one out adds a new layer of strategy.
I, personally, think that swapping one out would make the matches harder, more interesting, and more varied. So it isn't all about who can pick the best characters, because, well...after they pick the best characters, they have to start losing said characters. 😛.
I think there is enough change as is in this tournament that this rule really is not needed 😬
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
So to clarify, we're looking at swapping one guy out each match. We can swap them back in after a round or two, right?
Actually, initially I was going to have it that you could add a member of a defeated opponent's roster to your own to mix in to you amalgams, but Soljer suggested that rather than adding more choices you have to choose a character to swap out for a member of the defeated team.
It's currently up for vote.
Originally posted by Blair Wind
😠In my opinion, why should others benefit from the planning we do before the drafts? If they didnt think of the character, too bad for them
If it's single elimination, it doesn't matter - the winner HAS to take a loser's character, and the loser isn't in the tourney anymore, so it's not like he gets one of your good characters.
If it's double elimination, then it would be the winner that decides which two characters swap - meaning you would try to get the opponent character that would best go with your plans, and give THEM one of your characters that may NOT go with their plans.