Originally posted by tjcoady
Yea, I was guessing that. But I've been writing a paper comparing the transcendent elements of Goethe's Faust and Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights for the past.... ten hours... and was kinda ready to get into a fight about homophobia, especially if it centered around Galactus, who I'm a total fanboy for.
Galactus is obviously gay. He made a companion, who was male. wears a skirt. Picked Firlord and Airwalker who love each other as heralds and removed Norrins genitalia. You're a total famboy of his? Nice!
Originally posted by Nataku8188
I thought he was a bad ass too, when I was 12.
Now at 13 after several beatings from the neighbourhood girls you realise you are not.
Originally posted by Nataku8188I'm no shrink, but I'm pretty sure this is a good indicator that you are uncomfortable with your (homo)sexuality.
Well as a heterosexual I would not be comfortable with "my" homosexuality would I "Mr gay sig".
🙂
Originally posted by Futureman
Galactus is obviously gay. He made a companion, who was male. wears a skirt. Picked Firlord and Airwalker who love each other as heralds and removed Norrins genitalia. You're a total famboy of his? Nice!
Your powers of deduction are amazing, with logic like this I'm sure you could convince the Catholic church Jesus loved reach-arounds.
Now at 13 after several beatings from the neighbourhood girls you realise you are not.
Fantastic insult. Insinuating that I'm 13 and get beat up by girls is truly demeaning and, in fact, I believe I may be emotionally scared by your unmatched wit. Oh master of the sly tongue, teach me your cunning ways.
Well as a heterosexual I would not be comfortable with "my" homosexuality would I "Mr gay sig".🙂
At least your honest about your homosexuality. The fact remains that you look endlessly for ways to pin homosexuality on anything you dislike/disagree with and are, in fact, nothing more than a pathetic attempt at a troll. If maybe you were a little more intelligent you could get by with using gay-bashing without coming off as a 15 year old internet tough-guy, but even then that's giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Originally posted by Nataku8188Fantastic insult. Insinuating that I'm 13 and get beat up by girls is truly demeaning and, in fact, I believe I may be emotionally scared by your unmatched wit. Oh master of the sly tongue, teach me your cunning ways.
It would find teaching you extremely difficult. The first thing you would have to get over is the fact everytime you sit in front of a computer "some idiot" starts typing. We would need to overcome this, before the learning process could begin.
🙂
Originally posted by Futureman
It would find teaching you extremely difficult. The first thing you would have to get over is the fact everytime you sit in front of a computer "some idiot" starts typing. We would need to overcome this, before the learning process could begin.🙂
Dada... senses... overloading... anti-surrealist armor... breached! cannot...comprehend...what is being said here... brain imploding from lack of any sense in this post... at all...
"It would find?" who is "it?" What has he stumbled across exactly, that "it" is finding?"
"The first thing you would have to get over" only makes sense if you're a time traveler.
"everytime you sit in a computer some idiot starts typing." Now this one has many possible meanings. Does it mean that each time the person you are directing these comments towards sits at his or her computer, some idiot starts typing, as in he is the idiot who is typing? But what if you're not typing at all? What if you're reading? Or watching? Or perhaps you're making some allegorical point concerning the nature of computers: some idiot, somewhere, is typing everytime one sits at a computer. Or maybe this is some bizarre, Brechtian method of logic- one must pull back from the computer, and seize seeing it an emotional light, in order to understand idiociy. Or perhaps this is the aforementioned "it" who is, indeed, the idiot.
"We would need to overcome this, before the learning process can begin." Ahh, now I see. It begins to come full circle. It's a bit like the teachings of the later Buddhist scholars. We are, in fact, all "it" as well as "the idiot," thus the use of the plural "we" when no mention of any sort of grouping has been mentioned before.
Clearly I sit at the feet of a master.
Originally posted by Futureman
It would find teaching you extremely difficult. The first thing you would have to get over is the fact everytime you sit in front of a computer "some idiot" starts typing. We would need to overcome this, before the learning process could begin.🙂
Whirly, Judge, whichever washed-up wannabe troll this is, your insults are weak and your trolls are pathetic. Take a break, go play some counterstrike, hell maybe read some comics, spend time with your friends and family, whatever it is you do, because right now you're at a low point. Lower than I've seen in a while, and really, it's like kicking a dog while it's down.
Just give it a rest.
Originally posted by Nataku8188
Whirly, Judge, whichever washed-up wannabe troll this is, your insults are weak and your trolls are pathetic. Take a break, go play some counterstrike, hell maybe read some comics, spend time with your friends and family, whatever it is you do, because right now you're at a low point. Lower than I've seen in a while, and really, it's like kicking a dog while it's down.Just give it a rest.
The old "you are a troll" response, usual for those that have lost an argument. Good day to you.
Originally posted by Futureman
The old "you are a troll" response, usual for those that have lost an argument. Good day to you.
What argument? It was us insulting us and your last insult was so old and played out it didn't warrant any sort of response besides the one I gave. You're washed up Whirly, deal with it.
Originally posted by Nataku8188
What argument? It was us insulting us and your last insult was so old and played out it didn't warrant any sort of response besides the one I gave. You're washed up Whirly, deal with it.
The argument over your homosexuality of course. Your self realisation actualisation transferal due to your sig. I must say these "Whirly" accusations are tiresome. What the hell is a Whirly. Is it also a New Yorker like me?
Originally posted by Futureman
The argument over your homosexuality of course. Your self realisation actualisation transferal due to your sig. I must say these "Whirly" accusations are tiresome. What the hell is a Whirly. Is it also a New Yorker like me?
Oh, right. Sure, my sig makes me gay. What's wrong with that? You, apparently, are the only person with a problem with homosexuals anyways.
Come on Whirly, you can do better.
Originally posted by Nataku8188
You claim the cosmics look stupid and link their stupidity with homosexuality. Your tone alone can easily be considered gay bashing.
No, I claimed Galactus picked a boyfriend in Tyrant and fixed his hair for him in a less than masculine way. I also claimed Airwalker and Firelord are gay, a claim supported by a number of comics writers including Geffen. I also claimed the sufer has no genitalia and Galactus wears pink skirts. All true.