Typical Troll Tactics

Started by DigiMark00713 pages
Originally posted by Gokurules
So, you don't do v debates? What is a tounament? I saw it at the top of your forum.

It's no longer my forum. I only mod the other comic sections.

And I've entered tourneys from time to time, but they're separate from vs. debates and far more structured. Normally I prefer to judge them rather than enter though...too much time and effort involved. The current one is actually being held on another site and is just being organized through KMC.

...also just realized this guy's a sock, so I needn't have bothered to respond in the first place.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
It's no longer my forum. I only mod the other comic sections.

And I've entered tourneys from time to time, but they're separate from vs. debates and far more structured. Normally I prefer to judge them rather than enter though...too much time and effort involved. The current one is actually being held on another site and is just being organized through KMC.

In what way are they more structured? What is the judging criteria? Are they hero against hero? When was the last one you entered?

Originally posted by DigiMark007

...also just realized this guy's a sock, so I needn't have bothered to respond in the first place.

What?

Originally posted by DigiMark007
...also just realized this guy's a sock, so I needn't have bothered to respond in the first place.

Well, socks can make reasonable points.

Like Germans?

Originally posted by BackFire
Like Germans?
Yeah.

0 for 2, well done.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, socks can make reasonable points.

Granted. But my reason for not responding to them is that they have already lost the privilege of using the forums, and are in violation of forum rules just by being on. No point should ever be responded to imo, regardless of its validity.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Granted. But my reason for not responding to them is that they have already lost the privilege of using the forums, and are in violation of forum rules just by being on. No point should ever be responded to imo, regardless of its validity.

Well, we differ there. I don't even know what the original might have done and I don't really care, if they make good points it shouldn't matter anyways.

Don't feed the trolls, is all.

Originally posted by BackFire
Don't feed the trolls, is all.

I don't think participating in reasonable debate is feeding the trolls.

Any sock posting becomes trolling.

Originally posted by BackFire
Any sock posting becomes trolling.
I suppose that is a matter of definition. Disregarding a post of a sock because he or she chose to sock is ad hominem though. I like my debates logical and fair, regardless of who makes the point. Meaning, I'd reply to a well thought out post from someone I am pretty sure of is a troll for the sake of proper debating, I think it is necessary to ban them though for breaking the rules. Well, in some cases I guess.

It's not ad hominem because no one is saying that what he's saying is actually false or wrong, simply that he has lost the right to post here, so he should not be responded to. If someone did indeed claim the guy to be wrong because he's a sock, then you'd be correct, which may have happened, I suppose, but not that I've seen.

Just like during a formal debate, if someone stands up in the audience and starts yelling out an argument. No matter if it's good or not, he's not earned the right to participate in that particular argument, so what he says will be ignored by those who have.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's not ad hominem because no one is saying that what he's saying is actually false or wrong, simply that he has lost the right to post here, so he should not be responded to. If someone did indeed claim the guy to be wrong because he's a sock, then you'd be correct, which may have happened, I suppose, but not that I've seen.

Just like during a formal debate, if someone stands up in the audience and starts yelling out an argument. No matter if it's good or not, he's not earned the right to participate in that particular argument, so what he says will be ignored by those who have.

Wouldn't it be the person that is addressed decision whether they want to reply or not? Or are you making a rule that says don't reply to people you think are socks, if so, I'd like to know, I think I talk to trolls a lot 🙁

Nah, no rule, you can if you want, I don't care. Just engaging in a discussion with you, because you won't put out right now.

Originally posted by BackFire
Nah, no rule, you can if you want, I don't care. Just engaging in a discussion with you, because you won't put out right now.

Who said I won't put out? Is that skank PVS saying that filth about me?

AC said it.

Originally posted by BackFire
AC said it.

Oh yeah? OH YEAH? He doesn't take it in the ass anymore, you knew that?

He does for me.

I force him.

VVD helps.