Originally posted by dadudemon
I didn't...heh heh...but you just did. I never said anything other than "teh gayz".Did I just catch you off guard?
"teh gayz" was the part where you turned the conversation gay, as in man2man, not happy and jolly.
Is that a straight question, or more gay inuendo from you? Either way, no, is my answer.
Originally posted by Robtard
"teh gayz" was the part where you turned the conversation gay, as in man2man, not happy and jolly.
That is YOUR interpretation...not mine. "teh gayz" is a fun way of saying the gays, which is simply a plural reference to gays. I never actually gave a definition for gay...however, you brought up homosexuality, not me. Nya nya nya nya nya!!!! 😛
Originally posted by Robtard
"Is that a straight question, or more gay inuendo from you? Either way, no, is my answer.
There you go again.
Originally posted by dadudemon
That is YOUR interpretation...not mine. "teh gayz" is a fun way of saying the gays, which is simply a plural reference to gays. I never actually gave a definition for gay...however, you brought up homosexuality, not me. Nya nya nya nya nya!!!! 😛There you go again.
So "teh gays" = "gays", but "gays" no longer = homosexual? Right...
Originally posted by dadudemon
"gays" has more than one definition. It could be plural for more than one joyous or happy person.
True, but you opened our conversation on the grounds that I was talking again about something man2man gay (see below). I win, because you failed. Too bad you're not Asian, or I'd say "better luck tomorrow".
Originally posted by dadudemon
There you go again, bobby, always about teh gayz.