1 in 10 U.S. high schools is a ‘dropout factory’

Started by Darth_Erebus23 pages

Hardly surprising since so many young people in this country aspire to be a thug or "gangsta". It's cool to be a pimp or a "hoe". Popular culture and parents lack of involvement are the primary culprits.

Re: 1 in 10 U.S. high schools is a ‘dropout factory’

Originally posted by chithappens
Story here

Rest of the article is pretty disturbing. Oh and Utah is the only state with one.

Highschool is only usefull to those willing to learn. If you are uninterested in learning. Highschool will benefit you with only social development. Dropping out of highschool is not nearly as fatal to one's future as people make it out to be.

I agree but the dropout factory means 60 percent do not even make it to their senior year. That's alarming.

Originally posted by chithappens
I agree but the dropout factory means 60 percent do not even make it to their senior year. That's alarming.

I know why that would seem alarming to many people. I do know there is a solid argument to give credence to being alarmed. Personally,i do not see the problem here. This to me doesnt reflect on the school systems and their curriculum. As i have said before, if the person is not interested in education. School is not going to benefit that person. Many young adults dropout of highschool to later realize their thirst to learn and the importance of an education. contrary to popular belief. Dropping out of highschool doesnt hinder you from obtaining a successful life. You can still take steps to attend Universities if that is your desire. There are more programs today than there ever has been in assisting under educated adults.
I believe there are kids skipping highschool and going directly into a trade/tech school. Experience is infact more important than a lavish education history, Depending on the job.

I can turn on the TV and tell you this optimistic view is not neccesairly the case.

I refuse to cite the example to the rule as the standard that I use to gauge my views. I'm in the area (the South) where this occurs most often, and believe me they do not give a **** and do not have a plan for their futures, as a majority

Originally posted by botankus
I don't care if the schools are failing. I just want the kids to be put into Death Camps!

Did I say Death Camps? I meant Happy Camps.

You sure live in a happy place!

*Gives commendations*

Originally posted by chithappens
I can turn on the TV and tell you this optimistic view is not neccesairly the case.

I refuse to cite the example to the rule as the standard that I use to gauge my views. I'm in the area (the South) where this occurs most often, and believe me they do not give a **** and do not have a plan for their futures, as a majority

Yes, i know this is a astounding fact. I just argue the idea that these people would have any different of a future had they opted to stay in school. After becoming an adult i realized that there are people that just dont want anything out of life other than comfort that comes from instant gratification.

There has always been Those two kinds of people. Those whom want to succeed and those who dont care or dont know how. I believe there are more programs today promoting self preservation in the way of education than ever before. The trade industry is booming. With the only requirment being a GED to attend a tech school, there is no excuse other than lack of ambition to explain lack of education. When a 20 year old high school dropout cannot pass a GED test. It is not because the school systems failed them. It is because they failed themselves. A 7th grader can pass a GED test.

Originally posted by inimalist
Everyone should read this article:

http://www.macleans.ca/education/postsecondary/article.jsp?content=20070910_109139_109139&page=1


That articles premise seems kind of silly when you consider that they still needed high enough grades to go to college.

I think "No Child Left Behind" is probably the most insane, lunatic educational law passed in modern times. There's just so much backward, bizzare thinking in that law that it's hard to imagine what mental problems lead to it.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Yes, i know this is a astounding fact. I just argue the idea that these people would have any different of a future had they opted to stay in school. After becoming an adult i realized that there are people that just dont want anything out of life other than comfort that comes from instant gratification.

There has always been Those two kinds of people. Those whom want to succeed and those who dont care or dont know how. I believe there are more programs today promoting self preservation in the way of education than ever before. The trade industry is booming. With the only requirment being a GED to attend a tech school, there is no excuse other than lack of ambition to explain lack of education. When a 20 year old high school dropout cannot pass a GED test. It is not because the school systems failed them. It is because they failed themselves. A 7th grader can pass a GED test.


I agree. Our highschools are incredible, it's the people/Additude towards education that's causing this problem, not the Schhols.

Originally posted by King Kandy

I think "No Child Left Behind" is probably the most insane, lunatic educational law passed in modern times. There's just so much backward, bizzare thinking in that law that it's hard to imagine what mental problems lead to it.

why is it that everyone understands this except for George Bush and Ann coulter?

I love ann Coulter but she likes to f*ck a dying horse

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
why is it that everyone understands this except for George Bush and Ann coulter?

I love ann Coulter but she likes to f*ck a dying horse


I think that one of the stupidest parts is this:

Schools that has more then a certain number of expulsions are classified as "Dangerous".

Now, any rational person should be able to realize that all this will do is create a situation where dangerous people won't be removed...

I picture some congressman thinking "Boy, schools will be a lot safer if you keep a bunch of unsafe people in them."

Originally posted by King Kandy
I agree. Our highschools are incredible, it's the people/Additude towards education that's causing this problem, not the Schhols.

Please take into account that all high schools are not the same. SOme are extrememly poor in all facets.

Read the entire article and get back to this point

Originally posted by King Kandy
I think that one of the stupidest parts is this:

Schools that has more then a certain number of expulsions are classified as "Dangerous".

Now, any rational person should be able to realize that all this will do is create a situation where dangerous people won't be removed...

I picture some congressman thinking "Boy, schools will be a lot safer if you keep a bunch of unsafe people in them."

Dangerous schools 😂

Even when a child is expelled, they are required to attend an alternative school. I have read several studies that state and have known several friends that actualy benefited from attending alternate schools after being expelled. I know this is most likely not common, but i think it goes to show that ambition can sometimes be related to enviorment. The most prestigous of schools can hold a negative enviorment for young adults. Whether this negative enviorment was self imposed or externally influenced. There are many factors that go into a dropout factor other than the quality of the school.

So, yeah i whole heartedly agree with you. Keeping disruptive kids who persist to exhibit violent or distracted tendancies should at the very least be offered to attend alternate schools. These alternate schools cater to kids with learning obstacles.

Even more, If a person decides to dropout of school at the age of eighteen or acquires their parents permission at sixteen should not be categoized as a negative statistic. They are eighter making an adult decision, or have adult permission.

Go Utah.

That is all.

Originally posted by chithappens
Please take into account that all high schools are not the same. SOme are extrememly poor in all facets.

Read the entire article and get back to this point


Agreed, but if you take advantage of all they have to offer, I think you should be able to do okay.

Originally posted by chithappens
Please take into account that all high schools are not the same. SOme are extrememly poor in all facets.

Read the entire article and get back to this point

im not sure, but i think he was being ironic. Unless he did really mis spell schools accidently

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Dangerous schools 😂

Even when a child is expelled, they are required to attend an alternative school. I have read several studies that state and have known several friends that actualy benefited from attending alternate schools after being expelled. I know this is most likely not common, but i think it goes to show that ambition can sometimes be related to enviorment. The most prestigous of schools can hold a negative enviorment for young adults. Whether this negative enviorment was self imposed or externally influenced. There are many factors that go into a dropout factor other than the quality of the school.

So, yeah i whole heartedly agree with you. Keeping disruptive kids who persist to exhibit violent or distracted tendancies should at the very least be offered to attend alternate schools. These alternate schools cater to kids with learning obstacles.

Even more, If a person decides to dropout of school at the age of eighteen or acquires their parents permission at sixteen should not be categoized as a negative statistic. They are eighter making an adult decision, or have adult permission.


Yeah... But this rule is making it so that they WON'T expell them, because Schools don't want a "Dangerous" rating... They'd be out of there if that rule didn't exist.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
im not sure, but i think he was being ironic. Unless he did really mis spell schools accidently

That was just a typo.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Yeah... But this rule is making it so that they WON'T expell them, because Schools don't want a "Dangerous" rating... They'd be out of there if that rule didn't exist.

oh yeah, i know. I think it is ridiculous. i was trying to say that there should be enough to show that expulsion has no bearing on the education offered to a child.
The no child left behind policy is silly. It is to say that children were left behind before this policy, but schooling has been a requirement for some time. I believe it has been a requirement that children under the age of eighteen attend school since the 80's. I could be completely wrong, but i know this was the case when i was going through school, before the no child left behind crap

Originally posted by King Kandy
Agreed, but if you take advantage of all they have to offer, I think you should be able to do okay.

Life is not like the "Pursuit of the Happiness." Hard work does not always pay off.

What country you from?

They speak English in what?