Originally posted by ragesRemorse
oh yeah, i know. I think it is ridiculous. i was trying to say that there should be enough to show that expulsion has no bearing on the education offered to a child.
The no child left behind policy is silly. It is to say that children were left behind before this policy, but schooling has been a requirement for some time. I believe it has been a requirement that children under the age of eighteen attend school since the 80's. I could be completely wrong, but i know this was the case when i was going through school, before the no child left behind crap
I think it is 16...My friend in highschool moved out from his parents house and lived by himself in an apartment. He dropped out for a year to work and came back for his senior year. He was 18 then. He was able to call himself in late for school!!! That was the best thing ever.