Originally posted by KK the Great
Look, we nuanced HC debaters can't be handicapped by the fact that you lot have yet to evolve beyond simplistic feat comparisons.
I mean I been to hero chat it a joke.
I hate superman and I like the hulk, but im not some bias moron who actaully thinking the hulk stands a chance when he has no superior stats and is far less superior in many area's when compared with superman.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
so your bias morrons that can't see byond your bias to the ligcal out come?
We've just moved onto more nuanced, reasoned debate methodology.
And it isn't as though we're unfamiliar with how you guys do things. We recognize it as being exactly what we used to do--seven or eight years ago--before we grew into the comic industry intellectuals you see today.
We're like your comic board parents, or the previous generation or something. We see our younger selves in you, but you don't want to hear anything of it. Kids never do, no matter how much they stand to learn from their parents. Sometimes they just have to grow on their own, making all the same mistakes their parents made years prior.
If I may offer a comic analogy...
We're the Immortus to your Kang.
............so you simply avoid direct questions how wonderful.
first of all I been a member of hero chat for years.
second of all the way you do things are complete ignore evidence or simply don't present evidence at all.
so by evolving you mean devolving then I guess your right.
oh and give me one good reason hulk beats superman.
I can debate alot of characters, the guys from HC (Mexican, KK, etc), and the guys from KMC just take your picks and we can have a nice debate, preferably 2 on 2 or 3 on 3. Mexican or KK just agree with me on whatever characters your good at, and we can have a debate with them, they pick a character, etc.
The Thing, Hyperion, Gladiator, Firelord, Genis, Morg, Wonder Man, Hercules, Wolverine, Iron Fist, Human Torch, the Sentry, Atlas, Thanos, Shang Chi, Luke Cage, GL John Stewart, Drax, Captain Marvel (DC), Invisible Woman, etc
Originally posted by Battlehammer
............so you simply avoid direct questions how wonderful.
You mean that "r u guys are morawns?" bit wasn't rhetorical?
first of all I been a member of hero chat for years.
I think I would recognize your grammatical quirks if that were true.
second of all the way you do things are complete ignore evidence or simply don't present evidence at all.so by evolving you mean devolving then I guess your right.
What do you mean by present evidence?
If you mean strictly posting scans, then you need to understand that we've outgrown being capable of engaging in "scan trading" debates. With the exception of new issues, there are really no good references that we haven't all seen and discussed a thousand times over. Simply tossing up a scan and going "take that!" doesn't suffice anymore. We have to rely on our ability to argue logically and rationally within the framework of the million and one references we're all fully aware of from the start.
oh and give me one good reason hulk beats superman.
He doesn't.
Originally posted by KK the Great
We've just moved onto more nuanced, reasoned debate methodology.And it isn't as though we're unfamiliar with how you guys do things. We recognize it as being exactly what we used to do--seven or eight years ago--before we grew into the comic industry intellectuals you see today.
We're like your comic board parents, or the previous generation or something. We see our younger selves in you, but you don't want to hear anything of it. Kids never do, no matter how much they stand to learn from their parents. Sometimes they just have to grow on their own, making all the same mistakes their parents made years prior.
If I may offer a comic analogy...
We're the Immortus to your Kang.
dur
Originally posted by KK the Great
You mean that "r u guys are morawns?" bit wasn't rhetorical?I think I would recognize your grammatical quirks if that were true.
What do you mean by present evidence?
If you mean strictly posting scans, then you need to understand that we've outgrown being capable of engaging in "scan trading" debates. With the exception of new issues, there are really no good references that we haven't all seen and discussed a thousand times over. Simply tossing up a scan and going "take that!" doesn't suffice anymore. We have to rely on our ability to argue logically and rationally within the framework of the million and one references we're all fully aware of from the start.
He doesn't.
oh it true all right.
..............scann trading..........It called posting your points and then using evidence be it issue numbers , scanns to suport your post.
all you guys do there is ignore evidence and whine. also I posted a scann over there...........and no one had seen it before. so you guys don't know enarly as much as you think. You remind me of some one over there actaully.
so pritty much you guys are lazy/or don't have any evidence
so you agree hulk would get curf stomp by superman?
Originally posted by Battlehammer
oh it true all right...............scann trading..........It called posting your points and then using evidence be it issue numbers , scanns to suport your post.
That's brings you up to about Lesson 2 in Debate 101.
What happens when the evidence is on the table? You just keep repeating it louder and louder until someone breaks?
all you guys do there is ignore evidence and whine. also I posted a scann over there...........and no one had seen it before. so you guys don't know enarly as much as you think.
Yeah?
What scan was that, exactly?
You remind me of some one over there actaully.
Shocking.
Who could it be?
You think...
...you think maybe I remind you of me?
so you agree hulk would get curf stomp by superman?
Sure. If he just stands his ground and slugs it out, it would be a good fight, but he has the tools necessary to tear Hulk apart if he uses them.
I really hope herochatters and kmcers always wont resort to this. Mocking the other forum in every single debate sooner or later. This thread is here so we can find someone to debate with against the mexican. Please lets keep it civil people. I know shit happens but tomorrows a new day and lets not start saying your forum sucks and mine is better. They are both different and lets leave it at that.
Originally posted by KK the Great
That's brings you up to about Lesson 2 in Debate 101.What happens when the evidence is on the table? You just keep repeating it louder and louder until someone breaks?
Yeah?
What scan was that, exactly?
Shocking.
Who could it be?
You think...
...you think maybe I remind you of me?
Sure. If he just stands his ground and slugs it out, it would be a good fight, but he has the tools necessary to tear Hulk apart if he uses them.
wolverine beating DD in h2h combat.
well if you have the same name there then no. actaully most of hero chat has your superior then thou attitude yet when a debate happens............well they fall short of there prosona.
even if they slugged it out............superman could hit hulk 100 times before hulk could react.