Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Sorry was talking to assistant and on phone with one of our funders at same time. Refute or Don't post.
Talking to an assistant and brokering a mega-mutli-million dollar deal all while typing a post? Not bad. But can you do all that while juggling? That would be pretty impressive.
buy low sell high:
strider119
Originally posted by Strider119
Talking to an assistant and brokering a mega-mutli-million dollar deal all while typing a post? Not bad. But can you do all that while juggling? That would be pretty impressive.buy low sell high:
strider119
Nah. Just one of our funders. He wants to do a visit of our offices. See where his money is going.
Originally posted by KK the Great
Exactly. You guys use debate training wheels and we don't.If you want to debate us, we're not going to handicap ourselves. We'll demand that you rise to the challenge.
.......................demand us rise to what...............your standards are below ares. I actaully have to go back wards inorder to get to your standards.
Originally posted by KK the Great
Sliced his face up something fierce.Then on other occasions Thing has treated Wolvie like a non-threat and KO'd him with a casual lovetap.
That matchup really depends on the writer.
I mean your missing a huge part of the issue......the part were mister fantastic states thing got lucky that logan was dazed.
oh and the fact Logans healing factor has had major up grades to it
Originally posted by Battlehammer
.......................demand us rise to what...............your standards are below ares. I actaully have to go back wards inorder to get to your standards.
When you say this, it is empty bluster. At no time in the past did you debate the way we do. "Going backward" would just take you back to a time before you started debating.
When I say it, I'm speaking literal fact. Your debate methodology is identical (minus the grammar) to what we were doing seven or eight years ago. "Going backward" would literally cause me to approach your style.
Originally posted by KK the Great
When you say this, it is empty bluster. At no time in the past did you debate the way we do. "Going backward" would just take you back to a time before you started debating.When I say it, I'm speaking literal fact. Your debate methodology is identical (minus the grammar) to what we were doing seven or eight years ago. "Going backward" would literally cause me to approach your style.
Then y do you bother to stay here if we are so " backwards"?
Originally posted by KK the Great
When I say it, I'm speaking literal fact. Your debate methodology is identical (minus the grammar) to what we were doing seven or eight years ago. "Going backward" would literally cause me to approach your style.
Originally posted by KK the Great
When you say this, it is empty bluster. At no time in the past did you debate the way we do. "Going backward" would just take you back to a time before you started debating.When I say it, I'm speaking literal fact. Your debate methodology is identical (minus the grammar) to what we were doing seven or eight years ago. "Going backward" would literally cause me to approach your style.
dur
Originally posted by KK the Great
It absolutely does.It is just portrayed much more fanboyishly by--GET THIS--a different writer.
actaully it doesent. since the writter even makes a point of mentioning that thing was lucky.
...............fanboyishly? Logans like all mutants powers have increased. They have been stated upgrades to his healing factor. They can't go backwards.
Meaning he now far harder to KO.
also if you go by the majority of the showings thing stands no chance of KOing Logan a single blow.
so instead of actaully debating you use cop out like it depends on the writer? Do't be rediculous. You could say that about any debate. so in theory debates on herochat are pointless since you can always just go "it depends on the writter".
so much for herochat being so superior in the way they debate.
Originally posted by KK the Great
When you say this, it is empty bluster. At no time in the past did you debate the way we do. "Going backward" would just take you back to a time before you started debating.When I say it, I'm speaking literal fact. Your debate methodology is identical (minus the grammar) to what we were doing seven or eight years ago. "Going backward" would literally cause me to approach your style.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
actaully it doesent. since the writter even makes a point of mentioning that thing was lucky.
You keep saying that as though it means something.
...............fanboyishly? Logans like all mutants powers have increased. They have been stated upgrades to his healing factor. They can't go backwards.
Yes, fanboyishly.
When a guy has Wolverine crawl out of molten steel with his flesh entirely gone, that goes beyond a "good showing" for his healing factor into into the realm of ridiculous fanboy nonsense. How is he supposed to move with no muscles? A healing factor doesn't explain that. At all.
Meaning he now far harder to KO.
What does healing from damages have to do with being KO'd?
so instead of actaully debating you use cop out like it depends on the writer? Do't be rediculous. You could say that about any debate. so in theory debates on herochat are pointless since you can always just go "it depends on the writter".so much for herochat being so superior in the way they debate.
Yes, our nuance is superior to your simple-minded method.