Superman Prime (emo) vs. Thanos w/ tech

Started by KK the Great4 pages
Originally posted by Soljer
Wow, you seem to have a huge family, though it's numbers seem to be rapidly dwindling.

You have to think, they're competing for a potentially lucrative inheritance from nvr one day. It is only fitting that they'd be killing each other off to ensure a larger individual slice of the pie.

Originally posted by Galan007
Because he can be a crying little b*tch at times? ermm

Like Christoper Reeves/Superman when Lois died? 131fist

Originally posted by Bad Ash231
Like Christoper Reeves/Superman when Lois died? 131fist

Sad isn't the same as menstrual.

Originally posted by Bad Ash231
Like Christoper Reeves/Superman when Lois died? 131fist
Yeah but at least he made teh world spin backward!! hitlershakefist

Originally posted by Galan007
Because he can be a crying little b*tch at times? ermm

Well yeah if your whole world was destroyed and you had to stay in some messed up dimension you'd cry like b*tch sometimes too.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well yeah if your whole world was destroyed and you had to stay in some messed up dimension you'd cry like b*tch sometimes too.

But would you put on black lipstick and cut / burn yourself?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well yeah if your whole world was destroyed and you had to stay in some messed up dimension you'd cry like b*tch sometimes too.

We can come up with a thousand explanations for why Hitler was the way he was, too, but I'm not going to throw my support behind the guy.

Originally posted by KK the Great
We can come up with a thousand explanations for why Hitler was the way he was, too, but I'm not going to throw my support behind the guy.

Hey im not saying what he did was good but....when you got your whole universe destroyed and end up in a dimension that drives you mad come back and talk to me. When you havent gone through what somebody else has gone through its easy to sit there and judge. Hell the guy used to be a hero obvoulsy hes not completley right in the head and he wasnt fully mature either. I dont think you can compare SBP to Hitler. SBP used to be a hero.

Originally posted by Kutulu
But would you put on black lipstick and cut / burn yourself?

No but I might go nuts. Part of the problem is that the dimension made him slightly mad...from what I gathered.

P.S. Havent read the comics with him in it. Just read his bio and read lots of scans. I might have some of my facts wrong but I think I got a general idea, so I can stand to be corrected.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well yeah if your whole world was destroyed and you had to stay in some messed up dimension you'd cry like b*tch sometimes too.
How do you know my world hasn't been destroyed?
herbhappy

Originally posted by Galan007
How do you know my world hasn't been destroyed?
herbhappy
Originally posted by Galan007
How do you know my world hasn't been destroyed?
herbhappy

The Matrix.

Nuff said.

biscuits

Originally posted by Bad Ash231
The Matrix.

Nuff said.

biscuits

Cogito ergo sum.

Originally posted by Ouallada

Cogito ergo sum.

I think, therefore I am?

Wats dat haf 2 due wis teh Matricks? vegetajv2

Originally posted by Ouallada

Cogito ergo sum.

oh

Originally posted by Galan007
I think, therefore I am?

Wats dat haf 2 due wis teh Matricks? vegetajv2

Yup. Meh, if you believe Descartes, if you think, you exist. Context doesn't matter. Kinda like the argument South Park's Imaginationland was putting forward in part3.

Originally posted by Ouallada
Yup. Meh, if you believe Descartes, if you think, you exist. Context doesn't matter. Kinda like the argument South Park's Imaginationland was putting forward in part3.

You don't have to believe Descartes for it to be true.

The fact that you think means you exist.

Originally posted by Soljer
The fact that you think means you exist.

It should be noted that the reverse is not always true.

Originally posted by KK the Great
It should be noted that the reverse is not always true.

Unfortunately enough - but why note that? An implication isn't equivalent to it's converse.

Originally posted by Soljer
You don't have to believe Descartes for it to be true.

The fact that you think means you exist.

That's just giving credit to the guy when it was his philosophies that are discussed.

The most common flaw there is that you have two steps in your argument:

1) You think.
2) You exist.

The bridge between 1) and 2) is syllogistic. Not to mention the act of thinking requires relativising, but the existence of anything besides the first person cannot be proven without a third person perspective, meaning for disbelievers, this particular philosophy uses the subjective content of one's mind to prove the absolute reality of everything else.

Originally posted by Soljer
Unfortunately enough - but why note that? An implication isn't equivalent to it's converse.

I was just catching up on another thread, so it was fresh in my mind.