Originally posted by Kutulu
The comparison is of logic being used - by using the logic presented by some members of this forum, since Hulk's strength could not be measured, then you could therefore say that no measured weight or mass could be greater than his strength. That is the same logic being used in regards to Superman's heat vision - since "someone said" that his heat vision could not be measured, all of a sudden it's hotter than 3.6 billion degrees, since that is the highest heat measurement set.It's very very bad logic.
flawed logic because we cant produce anything near the mass of the sun. By saying the hulk's strength is immeasurable means he was able to lift any weight scientists could produce, meaning they could not measure his strength by those standards. This is different however, because scientists cannot produce anything close to the weight of the sun even though they ahve been able to measure its weight. Just beacuse hucs strength is immeasurable doesnt mean he can lift anything weve been able to measure, since Strength and weight arent the same thing. Its about being able to replicate what weve measured, and we cant replicate the weight of a planet, so we know huc was forced to try and lift anything that heavy.
They did however replicate 3.6 billion degrees, so in comparison they have a standard measurement that they can compare superman's HV to.
Just pointing out the logic that people are trying to make by using the real life scientific aspect
producing and measuring are not the same thing. They must be able to replicate