Fear as the Basis for Religion?

Started by Impediment6 pages
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Wouldn't you start to like it after a few hundred years? 😕

Only if they cuddled with me after the fact. ermmsrug

All hail the glorious redemption of our fathers............

🙁

Originally posted by debbiejo
All hail the glorious redemption of our fathers............

🙁

😕 But, then again, it was posted by Deb. 😈

Which makes it more meaningful... 📖

Originally posted by debbiejo
Which makes it more meaningful... 📖

Do you really think so? 😛

I just deposited my reality check and it cleared!! 😎

Originally posted by debbiejo
I just deposited my reality check and it cleared!! 😎

Now you have your two cents. 😂

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Now you're a rich, rich woman!! 😂

Filthy rich!! 😎

Originally posted by debbiejo
Filthy rich!! 😎

I did not say that. 😠

*takes Deb's two cents*

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'll say it agian

*Gives deb one million more*

😂

Originally posted by debbiejo
😂

*runs away*

nono

No, no, noooo...Hell isn't to far away, I'll go fetch that thread.........Hehe

Originally posted by debbiejo
nono

No, no, noooo...Hell isn't to far away, I'll go fetch that thread.........Hehe

That thread has been corrupted. Someone really tried to talk about hell in it. 😱 😆

Maybe the notion of Hell didn't scare some, but the garrucha, toca and the potro probably did the trick

Originally posted by Storm
Religion spends a lot of time reacting out of apparent fear. Rather than simply and confidently laying out a positive program of beliefs, too often religion is more concerned with raising an alarm over alleged dangers lying in wait all around us.

Not all religions use threats, divine or otherwise, in their attempts to enforce particular moral codes but it’ s certainly a common phenomenon. Shouldn’ t religion focus on the ideals of adhering to moral codes out of a sense of decency and love, rather than out of a fear of hell? Fortunately some do adopt this strategy, many others though don’ t seem to recognize the problem.

Perhaps threats and fear must be attractive to some people because otherwise, these religious groups would disappear.

Perhaps religions are so concerned with these "dangers" lets take the Devil for example because they actually exist...but the devil tells people such as yourself that hes no threat to anyone and that religious people are just trying to scare you...like a parent might tell a child the bogeyman will get them if they don't eat their veggies...its like...if you wanted to kidnap a child, even though the child has been told strangers are a danger they might go with you because you simply told the child you weren't a danger.

Re: Fear as the Basis for Religion?

Originally posted by Storm
Religion spends a lot of time reacting out of apparent fear. Rather than simply and confidently laying out a positive program of beliefs, too often religion is more concerned with raising an alarm over alleged dangers lying in wait all around us.

Not all religions use threats, divine or otherwise, in their attempts to enforce particular moral codes but it’ s certainly a common phenomenon. Shouldn’ t religion focus on the ideals of adhering to moral codes out of a sense of decency and love, rather than out of a fear of hell? Fortunately some do adopt this strategy, many others though don’ t seem to recognize the problem.

Perhaps threats and fear must be attractive to some people because otherwise, these religious groups would disappear.

So go make a religion and see what happens . . .

Not all religions use threats, divine or otherwise, in their attempts to enforce particular moral codes but it’ s certainly a common phenomenon. Shouldn’ t religion focus on the ideals of adhering to moral codes out of a sense of decency and love, rather than out of a fear of hell? Fortunately some do adopt this strategy, many others though don’ t seem to recognize the problem.

Oh can I also point out that whole statement is false and clearly brought about by a sweeping generalisation on a topic you know little about or have a prejudice towards due to limited study.