would you rather be deaf or blind?

Started by Bardock427 pages
Bardock42 Junior Member

Originally posted by Strangelove
Stevie Wonder would disagree.
As far as I recall Stevie Wonder didn't choose to be blind.

Victor Von Doom Latverian Diplomat

Originally posted by Robtard
Indeed. Just come to clean (to DK), admit you're a little kid and you've never touched a "boobie".

That or I'll continue to question you about your supposed lesbianism.

You won't be able to maintain the dichotomy should I not choose.

lord xyz Restricted

I'd rather be deaf. I'm more dependant on my eyes. Most people are.

But to be honest, I couldn't truly decide.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
You won't be able to maintain the dichotomy should I not choose.

Only one way to find out.

(edit)I should really add, it’s stacked against you; you’re going to have to convince people that you’re not only a rug-muncher, but you’re also a woman that tolerates AC. Come on.

Oh, what are your thoughts on tribadism?

Alpha Centauri Restricted
Originally posted by Devil King
and we all know who's job that is.

Yeah.

Oh, you meant me. Haha, slick. Comes with the gay I suppose.

-AC

Devil King Restricted

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah.

Oh, you meant me. Haha, slick. Comes with the gay I suppose.

-AC

What's that? The slick?

InnerRise Restricted

Originally posted by lord xyz
I'd rather be deaf. I'm more dependant on my eyes. Most people are.

But to be honest, I couldn't truly decide.

But you just did decide. 😬

I still say being Mute is a better option than both Deafness and Blindness.

The least debilitation.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Robtard Senor Member

Originally posted by InnerRise
But you just did decide. 😬

I still say being Mute is a better option than both Deafness and Blindness.

The least debilitation.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

If we can ignore the thread guidelines when deciding, then I'd rather lose a toe or have nothing negative happen to me, than be either def or blind. But that isn't an option, now is it.

chillmeistergen Restricted

Originally posted by InnerRise
But you just did decide. 😬

I still say being Mute is a better option than both Deafness and Blindness.

The least debilitation.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

It's a shame muteness wouldn't stop you typing.

SelphieT you teasing like you do

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
People who choose being blind and cite music as a reason are just trying to seem like some hardcore music lover.

I am, but I recognise correct priorities. Sight first, then sound.

It's easier to make up for loss of sound than sight.

-AC

Oh completely.

InnerRise Restricted

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
It's a shame muteness wouldn't stop you typing.
It's a shame you'll disrupt a thread in an attempt to obtain my attention, which you have actually done and always do b/c you're obsessed with me. (Flattering)

Back on topic shall we child, I'll give you your daily autograph later.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

ragesRemorse Senior Member

I couldnt imagine not being able to admire the female body

~Forever*Alone~ Empress

okay i have another question...

would you rather have your legs severed off mid-thigh, or be paralyzed from the waist down...

id go with losing the legs.

InnerRise Restricted

Kind of an obvious answer and I'd say your choice is rather....absurd at the least.

Either option ends with you not having legs to walk with.

Who in their right mind would choose for their legs to be cut off over just being paralyzed?

🤨

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Disturbed Angel ~.:Fae:.~

Originally posted by ~Forever*Alone~
title says it all...

i would rather be blind, im going blind anyway...

but i couldnt live without music, it would drive me insane, the silence.


Oh yeah? Well I've been steeped in that very silence for almost 14 years now, since I lost my hearing at six years old. But I'd rather be like this than blind.

dadudemon Senior Member

Originally posted by InnerRise
Kind of an obvious answer and I'd say your choice is rather....absurd at the least.

Either option ends with you not having legs to walk with.

Who in their right mind would choose for their legs to be cut off over just being paralyzed?

🤨

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

ME!!! I would still be able to get my nasty on if my legs were cut off but if I were paralyzed from the waste down, I wouldn't have any feeling from the waste down. I would also like to be able to control what happens with urination and defecation fully and completely.

Why would anyone choose paralyzation rather than legs missing from mid thigh down?

Originally posted by Disturbed Angel
Oh yeah? Well I've been steeped in that very silence for almost 14 years now, since I lost my hearing at six years old. But I'd rather be like this than blind.

Really? I would have NEVER guessed you to be deaf...EVER. It is very admirable that you have overcome your lack of hearing so well.

~Forever*Alone~ Empress

to each their own.

Disturbed Angel ~.:Fae:.~

Originally posted by dadudemon
Really? I would have NEVER guessed you to be deaf...EVER. It is very admirable that you have overcome your lack of hearing so well.

Lol, no one can guess unless I tell them, and even then, they don't believe it. 😂 And it's more hearing impaired now than deaf, since I now hear well enough to listen to music, but I still need to read lips when talking to people. I don't even use sign language, lol.

ragesRemorse Senior Member

Originally posted by ~Forever*Alone~
okay i have another question...

would you rather have your legs severed off mid-thigh, or be paralyzed from the waist down...

id go with losing the legs.

If i lost my legs at mid thigh, i could still walk with prostetics. seems like an obvious answer to me

dadudemon Senior Member
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
If i lost my legs at mid thigh, i could still walk with prostetics. seems like an obvious answer to me

Quoted ftw. (for the win)