Storm v.s. Sentry

Started by Violent2Dope7 pages

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Storm instantly controls the sun and forces a Caronal discharge that sends her back to earth at goddamn wtf speeds.

Fight continues.

Right, because we all know she can survive the heat of the sun long enough to do this.

Yeah, because breaking the SmvsFl rule is really all storm has going for her.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Yeah, because breaking the SmvsFl rule is really all storm has going for her.
What?

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
What?
SmvsFl is the shorthand for the "Spiderman versus Firelord" rule.

Its rules out feats of characters preforming beyond proven capabilities. It specifically cites a Feat of spiderman's where he knocked out firelord. It is inadmissible due to it being beyond his proven powerset.

Other examples include bone claw wolverine cutting thanos. or Storm absorbing the galactic core, or WWH taking an attack of a high level matter manipulator with his clothing intact. Most characters have feats of them doing things beyond their proven powerset. In order to make them accepted they need to be shoown concistantly. Twice at least. It's part of a counterpart to pis because it too is a stupid happening purely for the sake of furthering the plot. Usually if the writer cannot think of a logical way out of a given scenerio they make up something stupid.

Originally posted by Creshosk
SmvsFl is the shorthand for the "Spiderman versus Firelord" rule.

Its rules out feats of characters preforming beyond proven capabilities. It specifically cites a Feat of spiderman's where he knocked out firelord. It is inadmissible due to it being beyond his proven powerset.

Other examples include bone claw wolverine cutting thanos. or Storm absorbing the galactic core, or WWH taking an attack of a high level matter manipulator with his clothing intact. Most characters have feats of them doing things beyond their proven powerset. In order to make them accepted they need to be shoown concistantly. Twice at least. It's part of a counterpart to pis because it too is a stupid happening purely for the sake of furthering the plot. Usually if the writer cannot think of a logical way out of a given scenerio they make up something stupid.

😆 @ it being her handbook entry for YEARS now.

Get over it.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
😆 @ it being her handbook entry for YEARS now.

Get over it.

I find it funny how you have to break the rules of kmc and logic in order to "win". You're incapable of anything other than breaking rules. Its why you were banned before afterall.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
😆 @ it being her handbook entry for YEARS now.

Get over it.

Hmm...

How ironic.

Originally posted by King Kandy

I guess we should also use Cosmic Spidey, Cosmic Hulk and Cosmic Wolverine too.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I find it funny how you have to break the rules of kmc and logic in order to "win". You're incapable of anything other than breaking rules. Its why you were banned before afterall.

Not breaking rules at all.

You just can't handle the truth that Storm's powers include, but are not limited to......you know the rest.

deal. 😮‍💨

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Not breaking rules at all.

You just can't handle the truth that Storm's powers include, but are not limited to......you know the rest.

deal. 😮‍💨

Denial is an ugly thing. suits you perfectly.

You have to break the rules to "win". Why else would you break them all the damn time? 2damn many rules broken.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Denial is an ugly thing. suits you perfectly.

You have to break the rules to "win". Why else would you break them all the damn time? 2damn many rules broken.

You can't prove it's SMvsFL.

Originally posted by Creshosk
SmvsFl is the shorthand for the "Spiderman versus Firelord" rule.
Speaking of Firelord...

😂@her not being dead.

Hell, she hit Surfer harder than that and wasn't even really trying.

Originally posted by Creshosk
SmvsFl is the shorthand for the "Spiderman versus Firelord" rule.

Its rules out feats of characters preforming beyond proven capabilities. It specifically cites a Feat of spiderman's where he knocked out firelord. It is inadmissible due to it being beyond his proven powerset.

Other examples include bone claw wolverine cutting thanos. or Storm absorbing the galactic core, or WWH taking an attack of a high level matter manipulator with his clothing intact. Most characters have feats of them doing things beyond their proven powerset. In order to make them accepted they need to be shoown concistantly. Twice at least. It's part of a counterpart to pis because it too is a stupid happening purely for the sake of furthering the plot. Usually if the writer cannot think of a logical way out of a given scenerio they make up something stupid.

Oh, that makes sense.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You can't prove it's SMvsFL.
Sure I can. In fact, Thanks bran that's a good start.

ACtually you have to prove its valid. Burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove that its within the confines of the rules.

I'll give you a hint, omniversal level people(like you think Storm is) aren't pwned by Hulk.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
😂@her not being dead.

Hell, she hit Surfer harder than that and wasn't even really trying.

Firelord obviously wasn't trying to kill them, since he openly states "hey're lucky to be alive"

So tell me, not even firelord's full power and she passes out? She pushes herself to clear up "what the avenger thor could do with but a thought" and nearly passes out?

That's two to your one.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Firelord obviously wasn't trying to kill them, since he openly states "hey're lucky to be alive"

So tell me, not even firelord's full power and she passes out? She pushes herself to clear up "what the avenger thor could do with but a thought" and nearly passes out?

That's two to your one.

You have no proof he wasn't going for the kill.

She houses Eternity

She heals a dimensional tear in reality

Summons the GC

3

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You can't prove it's SMvsFL.

Is your doctor aware that you are off your meds?