Storm v.s. Sentry

Started by Violent2Dope7 pages

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You have no proof he wasn't going for the kill.

She houses Eternity

She heals a dimensional tear in reality

Summons the GC

3

And gets pwned by Hulk.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You have no proof he wasn't going for the kill.
If he was going for the kill wouldn't he have thought them dead, rather than knowing they were alive?

Originally posted by 2damnloud
She houses Eternity
Not within the same powerset. Already proven to be PIS as It excluded surfer who had already accomplished the feat before... I'll accept Strange not knowing what he was talking about or an explination that ties it to a magical basis. In which case there might have been magic to help her with the feat.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
She heals a dimensional tear in reality
Not the same powerset.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Summons the GC
Circular reasoning fallacy.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
3
nope, sorry.

[

Originally posted by Creshosk

Not within the same powerset. Already proven to be PIS as It excluded surfer who had already accomplished the feat before... I'll accept Strange not knowing what he was talking about or an explination that ties it to a magical basis. In which case there might have been magic to help her with the feat.

Prove it's not within her powerset.

Bring forth evidence that Surfer's feat is equivalent to Eternity.

Strandge knew exactly what he was talking about because Storm, as it stands, is a direct descendant of the first sorceress.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Not the same powerset.

Still her power.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Circular reasoning fallacy.

Not circular reasoning. Circular reasoning would be me saying the bible is true because the bible says so.

Originally posted by Creshosk

nope, sorry.

Yep.

3 huge feats, 2 of which are argubale larger than the core.

Deal.

Burden of proof isn't on him. It's on you.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Prove it's not within her powerset.
Can't prove a negative mr weasle. 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Bring forth evidence that Surfer's feat is equivalent to Eternity.
Or how about you bring forth evidence that hers was on level with his? 🙂 Oh right you can't cause you never read it.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Strandge knew exactly what he was talking about because Storm, as it stands, is a direct descendant of the first sorceress.
So it has a more magical reason.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Still her power.
Equivocation and Circular reasoning. 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Not circular reasoning. Circular reasoning would be me saying the bible is true because the bible says so.
Or like you saying its within her powerset because its her doing it when its the feat that's in question of not being within her powerset? 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Yep.

3 huge feats, 2 of which are argubale larger than the core.

Deal.

Sorry, nope. Two equivication fallacies and a circular reasoning fallacy.

Nothing logical or valid.

Originally posted by Jebus reborn
Go to sleep b*tch.
Originally posted by Jebus reborn
Storm ownage.
Here she pawns Shaw.

Dark Phoenix (this one really proves that she was at her level).

Firelord.

Magneto.

Thor.

Apoc.

Cyclops.

Damn, that's some quality Storm ownage.

The 😂 worthy stuff is off the charts in this thread. All thanks to 2damn.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Can't prove a negative mr weasle. 🙂

Depends on the negative

My assertion has a basis/evidence(Handbooks, comics, science), yours doesn't.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Or how about you bring forth evidence that hers was on level with his? 🙂 Oh right you can't cause you never read it.

You made the assertion that it somehow has some baring on the feat being PIS so YOU bring the evidence.

You have basis for your assertion only circumstantial evidence(comparing two unrelated instances)

Originally posted by Creshosk

So it has a more magical reason.

Perhaps, since her ancester is, ya know a sorceress Supreme.

See "still her power".

Originally posted by Creshosk

Equivocation and Circular reasoning. 🙂

Nope and Nope.

Go back to wiki.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Or like you saying its within her powerset because its her doing it when its the feat that's in question of not being within her powerset? 🙂

I did just do that didn't I??

Let me check.........

Oh yea.

Well Still have Eternity, Altering the ecosystem the size of hemisphere, and altering the hemisphere GLOBALLY.

So the Thor thing would be PIS.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Sorry, nope. Two equivication fallacies and a circular reasoning fallacy.

Not equivocation nor circular reasoning. Power is Power.

Originally posted by Creshosk
.

Nothing logical or valid.

That's you.✅

2damn has only proved that ignorance is bliss. Storm loses. She doesn't have the powers of Enternity and can't access the galactic core.

Altering the hemisphere globally doesn't even make sense. 😬

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist

5 times in 32 years 😂

😄 @ all them sides Phoenix being able to do what she can do.

All are PIS.

That should be "weather"

This is just rediculous. Storm dies. Horribly.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
5 times in 32 years 😂

😄 @ all them sides Phoenix being able to do what she can do.

All are PIS.

I felt the need to read this for some reason...

Based on her beating top opponents, and taking good shots right?
PIS actually has to do with stupidity... and I guess the Firelord one is pis, because her, Nightcrawler, and Banshee weren't disintegrated on the spot.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
5 times in 32 years 😂

😄 @ all them sides Phoenix being able to do what she can do.

All are PIS.

5>3

You defeat your own arguments.

Thank you for proving they're not within her powerset. 😉

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Depends on the negative

My assertion has a basis/evidence(Handbooks, comics, science), yours doesn't.

Circular reasoning. You're using what's already being uestioned to prove the validity of that which is in question. 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You made the assertion that it somehow has some baring on the feat being PIS so YOU bring the evidence.
I called bullshit on your claim. You still haven't proven your claim.
Burden of proof fallacy.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
You have basis for your assertion only circumstantial evidence(comparing two unrelated instances)
Right they are unrelated. So how many examples of that level of energy absorption do we have to prove its within her powerset?

1, but its already in question. So 0 collaboarting feats to support it. 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Perhaps, since her ancester is, ya know a sorceress Supreme.
Speculation. 🙂

Originally posted by 2damnloud
See "still her power".
Circular reasoning .

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Nope and Nope.
Deny it all you want. Doesn'rt make it not so.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Go back to wiki.
What does Wiki have to do with anything?

Originally posted by 2damnloud
I did just do that didn't I??
More circular reasoning. "I've proven myself because I say I did"

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Let me check.........

Oh yea.

Well Still have Eternity, Altering the ecosystem the size of hemisphere, and altering the hemisphere GLOBALLY.

unrelated feat, and two lower level feats.

Altering the hemisphere<Millions of stars.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
So the Thor thing would be PIS.
Right. 🙄

"Anything that shows storm in a low showing is pis."

Wishful thinking fallacy. "It's that way because I want it to be."

Originally posted by 2damnloud
Not equivocation nor circular reasoning. Power is Power.
Yes because teleportation and healing is the same thing as weather manipulation or combusting matter on a sub-atomic level. As I said, Equivocation and circular reasoning.

Originally posted by 2damnloud
That's you.✅
Ad hominem.

You're arguments still aren't valid or logical. 🙂

Storm dies. Storm was owned by a brick once while trying to hold up debris from a falling building. the crowd was going to kill her. Now what in the hell is she going to do with a speed blitz from a guy with uber energy powers, durability, AND strength? I dont' think she could beat Wonder Man, let alone Sentry.

Thread title made me lol. Why is the debate still open?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Circular reasoning. You're using what's already being uestioned to prove the validity of that which is in question. 🙂

Trying too hard.

You want me to prove something without calling upon the evidence?

Let me guess, because the evidence proves you wrong.

😂

Originally posted by Creshosk

I called bullshit on your claim. You still haven't proven your claim.
Burden of proof fallacy.

Yes, you called me on my bullshit using circumstantial evidence. 😂

Originally posted by Creshosk

Right they are unrelated. So how many examples of that level of energy absorption do we have to prove its within her powerset?

Comics make it apart of her powerset.

Not circular reasoning since the comics are the proof.

Originally posted by Creshosk

1, but its already in question. So 0 collaboarting feats to support it. 🙂

Eternity(the whole of the Universe) and Channelling a dimension.

All in canon which=proof

Both dealing with mutant ability and spirituality, Both greater, both corroborate the core.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Speculation. 🙂

Hence the "perhaps"

Originally posted by Creshosk

Circular reasoning .

Don't you mean equivocation??

Still wouldn't be true. 😂

Originally posted by Creshosk

Deny it all you want. Doesn'rt make it not so.

Assert it all you want, doesn't make it true.

Originally posted by Creshosk

More circular reasoning. "I've proven myself because I say I did"

Nope.

I've proven myself because the comics do. 😂

Originally posted by Creshosk
unrelated feat, and two lower level feats.

Related to the Thor thing being PIS.

Catch up

Originally posted by Creshosk

Altering the hemisphere<Millions of stars.

Eternity>>>>>>>>Millions of Stars

Trion dimesion>>>>>>Millions of stars.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Right. 🙄

"Anything that shows storm in a low showing is pis."

Wishful thinking fallacy. "It's that way because I want it to be."

Starwman

Originally posted by Creshosk
Yes because teleportation and healing is the same thing as weather manipulation or combusting matter on a sub-atomic level. As I said, Equivocation and circular reasoning.

Yes it would be ignoring the context.

Strawman/ ad hominem.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Ad hominem.

Ad hominem on you. You know not the context in which I was speaking.

Originally posted by Creshosk

You're arguments still aren't valid or logical. 🙂

Keep telling yourself that.