Originally posted by Ultra Omega
The Omniscient Narrator outright claims: "For the Exiles, this is the way that Creation ends." This is in reference to what would happen if Proteus were to regain control over his personality and memories.
I finshed re-reading the arc yesterday,
the Arc had nothing to do with Proteus.
But it did have to do with the "End of Creation" ... but NOT at the hands of Proteus.
In fact,
that whole scene in the beginning was a farce,
a mis-understanding of the true threat in that issue, and the rest of the arc.
How is this mis-understanding possible?
Because of their last confrontation with Proteus,
when he tried to download the Crystal Palace's indices in it's data base.
The Crystal Palace's network system was partially damaged,
they can access realities, teleport back & forth,
BUT ... (say it with me now)
"We can't always see what's happening"
......................................................................................
And WHAT happened that was mis-understood?
Like the computer sumilation telling them Proteus is the threat to the Omniverse,
when in FACT,
it was Earth 1720's Reed Richards' TECH,
and Susan Richards, who turned evil in that world and became Madam Hydra.
As Madam Hydra, she wanted to use Reed's TECH, to conquer the Omniverse.
NOT Proteus, heck, Proteus isn't even mentioned after issue #1. 😬
I'll get to that in a second ... with the PROOF as always.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
Firstly, you label it hyperbole, which is just plain silly. It's not an exaggeration on the narrator's part, it's quite clearly an extremely unambiguous statement, with the meaning being quite fixed, and not up for variation. You have quite frankly no grounds to label it hyperbole.
My bad, it wasn't even hyperbole, just a computer glitch,
which I'll prove in a bit.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
Secondly, you try to argue against it by claiming that Proteus is a Global threat at best, simply based on his showings. Well, absence of proof is nor proof of absence. Just because he hasn't shown such power, it doesn't mean he doesn't have it. Provide proof of a necessity for displaying such power, or drop the point. Given that Proteus' goal wasn't exactly anything mass destruction related, but simply to find the perfect host for which could contain his power, there would be no need to display power on such a level.
Actually Proteus tried to download the Crystal Palace's index to every reality during HOM,
he did this, to gain access to other realities,
in order to cause havok in them.
So yea, Proteus very much wanted to destroy and conquer.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
Thirdly, you appear to think that the fact that the future never came into fruition somehow detracts from Proteus' displayed ability in the future. Here's a hint: it doesn't. Just like the definitive future that could have occurred with Jaspers, what prevented the one with Proteus from coming to pass was a plot device; that he wasn't able to regain control over his memories. This doesn't detract from the power level he possessed however, which would remain constant.
Upon new info learned,
that computer simulation was just a network glitch,
Exiles were running in circles thinking Proteus was the Omniversal threat,
we soon learned it was Reed Richards' TECH being manipulated by Madam Hydra,
Madam Hydra (Susan Richards)
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
So, your counter arguments are quite clearly worthless,
and the fact remains that Proteus, at that point in time, possessed the level of power capable of destroying the entire Omniverse.
My argument is "worthless"
yet you don't even know what the heck the arc was about.
You took one page from the first issue of the arc and ran for broke with it,
you should've read the rest of the arc friend.
Unlike yourself, I'll sustain from demeaning your mis-guided post.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
Now, as for your example with Jaspers, there is a fundamental point that you're missing. These future timelines that would be collapsing are only the future timelines that would have been a product of the 616 timeline. This doesn't account for all the timelines that were non parallel to the Earth 616 Universe. So, as I said, the amount of the Omniverse that would be effected is quite frankly completely unknown. It's a great feat to be sure, but you're misinterpreting just how great.
Jaspers collapsed the entire Omniverse on panel
in a possible Future actually seen by Cobweb.
Nice try on the timeline spin, completely made up.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
As for my second piece of evidence for Proteus; from the same issue where he's stated to end creation in a "What If?" future,
Proteus has nothing to do with any "What If" future,
"What If" futures, are actually Alternate Universes in continuity.
Proteus was simulated by the network systems of the Palace owning the Exiles,
and destroying a couple of Planets in his hands.
We quickly learned that was a systems glitch,
the real threat was Reed Richards' TECH.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
he's stated as being "possibly the most powerful being in creation," meaning at the very least, he's at least close in power to anyone who may be above him in power.
Proteus is possibly a global power, nothing more ... if that.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
Now you can meander all you want, but I'm fairly certain that my points speak for themselves,
Nah.
What we got here is a game of show & tell,
you're telling me everything and showing me nothing.
Originally posted by Ultra Omega
and the fact remains that Proteus is logically more powerful than Jaspers, based both on what his power could achieve, and his given power status in the Omniverse. [/B]
I'll giggle later.