Originally posted by Silent Master
Talk about reaching, you may call them by multiple names but that's you. Besides, he also said Odin > Darkseid in power, which BTW would include all forms of the OE that Darkseid can use.
That would be contradictory if he hard a hard time choosing betweent he two powers. And I'm not reaching. The multiple names are on panel as fact. The Omega is what creates alternate realities and makes planets out of nothingness. the Omega effect is the time space manipulation and matter manip power. The Omega wrealm is where the Omega powers come from. The Omega beams are pure concussive force. The Omega Force is what supplied the power to collapse a fifth of reality. There are different names for each of the powers. I'm over you. find someone else to troll. I'm pretty sure that is what you are doing and had planned on doing. It was the whole purpose of your responding to something I wrote to another poster entirely. That didn't have anything to do with you. you still aren't a cool kid.
I read the first few pages of this thread, where people were posting absolutely terrible lists.
Then I jumped to the last few, where it had somehow become just another Omnipotent Darkseid thread with nvr.
Is it worth my time (entertainmentwise) to read the middle of the thread to see how it progressed from one topic to the other?
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
You think marvel would want dan to say, marvel is forcing me to recant. Are you really that slow on the uptake? The evidence of the interview itself and what the interviewer says about dan's recant is all I need. Now go chew bricks. I gave my reason's why I said what I said, which wasn't a lie. That you look a fool is not my problem. No go hide under a rug or something.
I know the interviewer.
If he says something, you can bet your life that the opposite is true.
Originally posted by KK the Great
I read the first few pages of this thread, where people were posting absolutely terrible lists.Then I jumped to the last few, where it had somehow become just another Omnipotent Darkseid thread with nvr.
Is it worth my time (entertainmentwise) to read the middle of the thread to see how it progressed from one topic to the other?
I didn't bring up DS.
Originally posted by Creshoskjust let him be. he wants to be one of the cool kids. he's seeking attention anyway he can get it. Treat him like that silent fart you do on a really good date. You just hope no one notices and that it goes away fast.
You don't think its an indignity to cal lthem a liar? Or Contemptous?You're pretty deluded there...
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
just let him be. he wants to be one of the cool kids. he's seeking attention anyway he can get it. Treat him like that silent fart you do on a really good date. You just hope no one notices and that it goes away fast.
It's funny that you're telling other people to 'let him be' when you are still repsonding to me after saying things like you're done with me or that I'm on ignore multiple times.
Originally posted by Silent MasterYou're a real idiot.
Not if it's true.
Sorry, but it's true. and yes, I'm insulting you. I'm flaming you in resonse to your trolling and your insistence of innocence. You insulted another user. and you refuse to admit it. You seem to think that if its true its not an insult. You're either a dodging weasle who's also a liar, or you're an idiot who doesn't understand that pointing out someone's negative traits is insulting them.
So which is it? Are you a liar who knows you insulted him and refuse to man up to it, or are you a socially inept imbecile who doesn't realize that pointing out negative character traits insults a person?
Originally posted by Silent MasterYou can keep someone from lieing without resorting to insults. Look at Mr. Master. HE just casually posts his responses and backs his claims as best he can.
Not letting someone lie is not the same as trolling.
But hammering on a guy, and then talking to another person as if he weren't there is trolling as the only thing this accomplishes is trying to get a reaction out of him by being rude to him in two ways, the direct insult and then treating him like garbage.
And yes I realize that I've insulted you, or at leat I hope I have so you get the point that pointing out a person's negative traits is an insult. And no I'm not a hypocrite, I'm owning up to the fact that I'm insulting you.
However you insult him by calling him a liar and then you yourself lie about it and say you didn't insult him. That makes you a liar and a hypocrite.
Get it yet? Do you like me pointing out you're a liar and a hypocrite? Cause these are current facts about you.
Originally posted by Silent MasterLiar. If he wasn't insulted why'd he say you insulted him?
I'm not insulted by the truth, therefore I don't consider it an insult to call someone who lied a 'liar'. and since I never insulted him, I'm not a 'liar and a hypocrite' at least as far as this debate goes.
Logic isn't your strong suit. It doesn't matter if YOU don't see anything wrong with your actions. You seem to think it's okay to insult someone and then brush it off by saying its the truth. That's why I called you socially inept. You just showed a blatent disregard for his feelings. And why I might ask? Because you think that he lied about something that you have no proof that it didn't happen that way. It's an ad ignorantiam fallacy to say that since there's no proof that marvel forced him to recant that they didn't. When before you tried to pass off him recanting the statement as "he was joking".
Just like now you're trying to pass off your insulting him as "its the truth".
It doesn't matter if its the truth or not. A person's face could literelly look like an ass, but telling them their ass looks like a face is an insult.
So yeah, you are a liar and a hypocrite. Which obviously insults you since you just tried to deny it.
I don't care if he considers it an insult, I don't, I believe I have already stated my reasons. As for being a liar and a hypocrite, most people are in regards to something, this topic just isn't one of them for me.
And he did lie, he stated that Marvel made Dan recant it, when Dan himself stated he was merely clarifying his comments once it became apparent people were taking a joke the wrong way.
Originally posted by KK the GreatI'd suggest against giving suggestions that indicate that you don't know what you're talking about.
I would suggest against using latin terms that you're only pretending to understand.
Argumentum ad ignorantium is not just "a latin term". I's the name of a logical fallacy that is basically "an appeal to ignorance". Basically stating "We don't have any evidence of it, the opposite MUST be true."
We don't have information about WHY he recanted. He might have simply felt like it, or the company might have actually forced him to. Simply because there is no evidence either way, its speculation to put a reason on it either way. But to say that one speculation is indeed false BECAUSE there is no evidence is to commit the "argumentum ad ignroantium" fallacy.